Draper v. RHMT, LLC
Filing
13
ORDER granting 12 Motion to Extend Time to File Answer. Gravitas Nevada Ltd. answer due 12/1/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 11/19/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)
Case 2:20-cv-01423-GMN-VCF Document 13 Filed 11/19/20 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
JEFFREY F. BARR, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 7269
ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP
3770 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 200
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
Telephone: 702-678-5070
Facsimile: 702-878-9995
jbarr@atllp.com
Attorneys for Defendant
Gravitas Nevada Ltd. d/b/a The Apothecarium
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
11
DANIEL DRAPER, individually and on
behalf of others similarly situated,
Case No.: 2:20-CV-01423-GMN-VCF
12
13
Plaintiff,
v.
14
15
RHMT, LLC. d/b/a THE APOTHECARIUM,
et al.,
16
Defendants.
17
UNOPPOSED MOTION
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO
ANSWER OR OTHER RESPONSIVE
PLEADING ON BEHALF OF
DEFENDANT GRAVITAS NEVADA LTD.
d/b/a THE APOTHECARIUM
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
18
19
Defendant Gravitas Nevada Ltd. d/b/a The Apothecarium (“Gravitas”), by and through
20
counsel, moves the court for a fourteen-day extension of time to file an Answer or other
21
responsive pleading to Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint for Damages and Injunctive Relief
22
Pursuant to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227 et seq. (“Amended
23
Complaint”) in the above-captioned case. In support of this unopposed Motion, Gravitas states:
24
25
1.
November 17, 2020.
26
27
28
Gravitas’ current deadline to respond to the Amended Complaint is
2.
This is the second extension sought by Gravitas.
///
///
-1-
Case 2:20-cv-01423-GMN-VCF Document 13 Filed 11/19/20 Page 2 of 3
1
2
3.
Gravitas’ counsel needs additional time to review and investigate the allegations
in the Amended Complaint and attempt to resolve the purported dispute.
3
4.
This motion is not made for purposes of hindrance or delay.
4
5.
Plaintiff’s counsel was consulted and does not oppose this motion for an
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
additional fourteen-day extension for Gravitas to file an Answer or other responsive pleading to
the Amended Complaint. If granted, Gravitas will have up to, and including, December 1, 2020,
to file an Answer or other responsive pleading to the Amended Complaint.
WHEREFORE, Defendant Gravitas Nevada Ltd. d/b/a The Apothecarium requests that
the Court enter an Order granting this unopposed Motion for an additional fourteen days to file
an Answer or other responsive pleading to the Amended Complaint, and for any further relief the
Court deems just and proper.
Dated: November 16, 2020.
ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP
14
By: /s/ Jeffrey F. Barr
JEFFREY F. BARR, ESQ.
NV Bar No. 7269
3770 Howard Hughes Parkway
Suite 200
Las Vegas, NV 89169
15
16
17
18
Attorneys for Defendant
Gravitas Nevada Ltd. d/b/a The
Apothecarium
19
20
21
22
23
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED:
24
25
26
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11-19-2020
DATED:
27
28
-2-
Case 2:20-cv-01423-GMN-VCF Document 12 Filed 11/16/20 Page 3 of 3
13
11/19/20
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
1
2
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5 (b), and section IV of District of Nevada Electronic Filing
3
Procedures, I certify that I am an employee of ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP, and that the
4
foregoing UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHER
5
RESPONSIVE PLEADING ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT GRAVITAS NEVADA LTD.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
D/B/A THE APOTHECARIUM AND ORDER was served:
via electronic service to the address(es) shown below:
Gustavo@kazlg.com
Counsel for Plaintiff Daniel Draper and the Putative
Class
via the U.S. Postal Service at Las Vegas, Nevada, in a sealed envelope, with firstclass postage prepaid, on the date and to the address(es) shown below:
Gustavo Ponce, Esq.
KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP, APC
6069 South Fort Apache Road, Suite 100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89148
Counsel for Plaintiff Daniel Draper and the
Putative Class
Date: November 16, 2020
/s/Sheila A. Darling
An employee of Armstrong Teasdale LLP
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?