Draper v. RHMT, LLC

Filing 13

ORDER granting 12 Motion to Extend Time to File Answer. Gravitas Nevada Ltd. answer due 12/1/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 11/19/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)

Download PDF
Case 2:20-cv-01423-GMN-VCF Document 13 Filed 11/19/20 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 JEFFREY F. BARR, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 7269 ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP 3770 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 200 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 Telephone: 702-678-5070 Facsimile: 702-878-9995 jbarr@atllp.com Attorneys for Defendant Gravitas Nevada Ltd. d/b/a The Apothecarium 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 11 DANIEL DRAPER, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Case No.: 2:20-CV-01423-GMN-VCF 12 13 Plaintiff, v. 14 15 RHMT, LLC. d/b/a THE APOTHECARIUM, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHER RESPONSIVE PLEADING ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT GRAVITAS NEVADA LTD. d/b/a THE APOTHECARIUM AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 18 19 Defendant Gravitas Nevada Ltd. d/b/a The Apothecarium (“Gravitas”), by and through 20 counsel, moves the court for a fourteen-day extension of time to file an Answer or other 21 responsive pleading to Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint for Damages and Injunctive Relief 22 Pursuant to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227 et seq. (“Amended 23 Complaint”) in the above-captioned case. In support of this unopposed Motion, Gravitas states: 24 25 1. November 17, 2020. 26 27 28 Gravitas’ current deadline to respond to the Amended Complaint is 2. This is the second extension sought by Gravitas. /// /// -1- Case 2:20-cv-01423-GMN-VCF Document 13 Filed 11/19/20 Page 2 of 3 1 2 3. Gravitas’ counsel needs additional time to review and investigate the allegations in the Amended Complaint and attempt to resolve the purported dispute. 3 4. This motion is not made for purposes of hindrance or delay. 4 5. Plaintiff’s counsel was consulted and does not oppose this motion for an 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 additional fourteen-day extension for Gravitas to file an Answer or other responsive pleading to the Amended Complaint. If granted, Gravitas will have up to, and including, December 1, 2020, to file an Answer or other responsive pleading to the Amended Complaint. WHEREFORE, Defendant Gravitas Nevada Ltd. d/b/a The Apothecarium requests that the Court enter an Order granting this unopposed Motion for an additional fourteen days to file an Answer or other responsive pleading to the Amended Complaint, and for any further relief the Court deems just and proper. Dated: November 16, 2020. ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP 14 By: /s/ Jeffrey F. Barr JEFFREY F. BARR, ESQ. NV Bar No. 7269 3770 Howard Hughes Parkway Suite 200 Las Vegas, NV 89169 15 16 17 18 Attorneys for Defendant Gravitas Nevada Ltd. d/b/a The Apothecarium 19 20 21 22 23 ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED: 24 25 26 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11-19-2020 DATED: 27 28 -2- Case 2:20-cv-01423-GMN-VCF Document 12 Filed 11/16/20 Page 3 of 3 13 11/19/20 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 2 Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5 (b), and section IV of District of Nevada Electronic Filing 3 Procedures, I certify that I am an employee of ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP, and that the 4 foregoing UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHER 5 RESPONSIVE PLEADING ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT GRAVITAS NEVADA LTD. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 D/B/A THE APOTHECARIUM AND ORDER was served: via electronic service to the address(es) shown below: Gustavo@kazlg.com Counsel for Plaintiff Daniel Draper and the Putative Class via the U.S. Postal Service at Las Vegas, Nevada, in a sealed envelope, with firstclass postage prepaid, on the date and to the address(es) shown below: Gustavo Ponce, Esq. KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP, APC 6069 South Fort Apache Road, Suite 100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89148 Counsel for Plaintiff Daniel Draper and the Putative Class Date: November 16, 2020 /s/Sheila A. Darling An employee of Armstrong Teasdale LLP 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?