Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Prince Cafe Restaurant, Inc. et al

Filing 14

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 13 ) is ADOPTED in its entirety. The motion for default judgment (ECF No. 12 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as stated in the Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 5/10/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)

Case 2:20-cv-01563-JAD-NJK Document 14 Filed 05/10/22 Page 1 of 2

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3 Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.,
4

Plaintiff

5 v.
6 Prince Café Restaurant, Inc. et al,
7

Case No.: 2:20-cv-01563-JAD-NJK
Order Adopting Report and
Recommendation and Granting
Motion for Default Judgment

Defendants

8

[ECF Nos. 12, 13]

The magistrate judge has reviewed the plaintiff’s motion for default judgment 1 and, in an

9 eleven-page report and recommendation, recommends that this court grant it in part. 2 The
10 deadline for any party to object to that recommendation was May 6, 2022, and no party filed
11 anything or asked to extend the deadline to do so. “[N]o review is required of a magistrate
12 judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.” 3 Having reviewed the report
13 and recommendation, I find good cause to adopt it, and I do.
14

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and

15 Recommendation [ECF No. 13] is ADOPTED in its entirety. The motion for default judgment
16 [ECF No. 12] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as stated in the Report and
17 Recommendation.
18
19
20
21
22

1

ECF No. 12.

2

ECF No. 13.

3

Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474
23 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).

Case 2:20-cv-01563-JAD-NJK Document 14 Filed 05/10/22 Page 2 of 2

1

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER

2 JUDGMENT in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants, jointly and severally, as
3 follows:
4

A.

$10,000 in statutory damages under 47 U.S.C. § 605(e)(3)(C)(i)(II);

5

B.

$7,500 in statutory damages under 47 U.S.C. § 605(e)(3)(C)(ii); and

6

C.

$1,050 in costs

7 and CLOSE THIS CASE.
8

_________________________________
U.S. District Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey
Dated: May 10, 2022

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

2