Safeco Insurance Company Of America v. Air Vent, Inc. et al

Filing 63

ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part 61 Motion to Extend Time t o Serve Powermax Electric. The deadline to effectuateservice on Powermax Electric is EXTENDED to 1/18/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 11/17/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)

Download PDF
Case 2:20-cv-01579-JAD-NJK Document 63 Filed 11/17/21 Page 1 of 1 1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, 9 Case No. 2:20-cv-01579-JAD-NJK Plaintiff(s), 10 v. 11 Order AIR VENT, INC., et al., [Docket No. 61] 12 13 Defendant(s). Pending before the Court is Air Vent’s motion to extend the deadline to serve third-party 14 Defendant Powermax Electric to March 3, 2022. Docket No. 61. No response was filed. Although 15 good cause exists for an extension, the Court is not persuaded that such a lengthy extension is 16 warranted based on the showing made and the current circumstances. See Docket No. 57-1 at ¶ 17 11 (representation that service in China is completed on average within seven months). 18 Accordingly, that motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The deadline to effectuate 19 service on Powermax Electric is EXTENDED to January 18, 2022.1 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 Dated: November 17, 2021 22 ______________________________ Nancy J. Koppe United States Magistrate Judge 23 24 25 26 1 The Court does not opine herein on the other relief sought, which is to serve Powermax Electric by alternative means. See Local Rule 2-2(b) (separate documents must be filed for each 27 type of request being made); see also Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. SFR Invs. Pool 1, LLC, 2017 U.S. 28 Dist. Lexis 132101, at *2 (D. Nev. Aug. 18, 2017) (discussing importance of this rule). To the extent such relief is sought, a separate motion must be filed. 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?