Maluafiti v. Rushmore Loan Servicing, LLC

Filing 12

ORDER granting 9 Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Response to 5 Motion to Dismiss. Responses due by 12/10/2020. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 11/20/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)

Download PDF
12 11/20/20 Case 2:20-cv-01663-JCM-VCF Document 11 Filed 11/13/20 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 David H. Krieger, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 9086 Shawn W. Miller, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 7825 KRIEGER LAW GROUP, LLC 2850 W. Horizon Ridge Pkwy, Suite 200 Henderson, Nevada 89052 Phone: (702) 848-3855 dkrieger@kriegerlawgroup.com smiller@kriegerlawgroup.com Attorneys for Plaintiff 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 2850 W. Horizon Ridge Pkwy, Suite 200 Henderson, Nevada 89052 KRIEGER LAW GROUP, LLC 10 11 12 Case No.: 2:20-cv-01663-JCM-VCG MICHELLE MALUAFITI, Plaintiff, 13 14 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS vs. RUSHMORE LOAN SERVICING, LLC, (Second Request) 15 Defendant. 16 17 MICHELLE MALUAFITI (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant RUSHMORE LOAN MANAGEMENT 18 SERVICES, LLC (“Rushmore”), incorrectly named “Rushmore Loan Servicing, LLC” in the Complaint, 19 collectively the “Parties”, hereby jointly stipulate and agree to allow an extension of time for Plaintiff to 20 file a response to Rushmore’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint (“Motion to Dismiss”) to 21 22 December 10, 2020. 23 The Motion to Dismiss was filed on October 22, 2020 and appears on the docket as ECF #5. 24 Plaintiff’s current deadline to respond to the Motion to Dismiss is November 19, 2020. The reason for 25 the request is two-fold: (1) counsel for Plaintiff needs additional time to fully examine and respond to 26 the arguments and legal analysis set forth in the Motion to Dismiss and whether an amended complaint 27 28 could address the issues raised or whether a quick resolution to the matter may be available; and (2) due -1- Case 2:20-cv-01663-JCM-VCF Document 11 Filed 11/13/20 Page 2 of 2 12 11/20/20 to COVID-19 and the State of Nevada’s recent restrictions, Plaintiff’s counsel has had to cancel its 1 2 meeting with Plaintiff and will need a few weeks to reschedule that meeting to review information with 3 the Plaintiff concerning the Motion to Dismiss. This is Plaintiff’s second request for an extension. 4 Rushmore will not be prejudiced by the delay and has agreed to the extension of time. This stipulation 5 has not been submitted for the purpose of delay or other impermissible purpose. 6 7 Stipulated and agreed on this date: November 13, 2020. 8 9 2850 W. Horizon Ridge Pkwy, Suite 200 Henderson, Nevada 89052 KRIEGER LAW GROUP, LLC 10 11 12 /s/ Shawn W. Miller . David H. Krieger, Esq. Shawn W. Miller, Esq. KRIEGER LAW GROUP, LLC 2850 W. Horizon Ridge Pkwy., Suite 200 Henderson, Nevada 89052 Attorneys for Plaintiff /s/ Jeffrey S. Allison Jeffrey S. Allison, Esq. HOUSER LLP 9970 Research Drive Irvine, California 92618 Attorneys for Defendant . 13 14 ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME 15 16 17 18 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. ________________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE November 20, 2020 Dated: __________________________________ 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?