Christensen v. Nguyen et al
ORDER Adopting 8 Report and Recommendation. This case is Dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 1/6/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
Case 2:20-cv-01770-APG-DJA Document 9 Filed 01/07/21 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3 COREY D. CHRISTENSEN,
Case No.: 2:20-cv-01770-APG-DJA
Order Accepting Report and
Recommendation and Dismissing Case
6 ROCHELLE T. NGUYEN and MATTHEW
[ECF No. 8]
On December 3, 2020, Magistrate Judge Albregts recommended that I dismiss this case
without prejudice because plaintiff Corey Christensen did not file an amended complaint by the
given deadline. ECF No. 8. Christensen did not object. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de
novo review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts
to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings
to which objection is made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)
(en banc) (“the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations
de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)).
I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Albregts’ report and recommendation
(ECF No. 8) is accepted and this case is dismissed without prejudice. The clerk of court is
instructed to close this case.
DATED this 6th day of January, 2021.
ANDREW P. GORDON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?