Christensen v. Nguyen et al

Filing 9

ORDER Adopting 8 Report and Recommendation. This case is Dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 1/6/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)

Download PDF
Case 2:20-cv-01770-APG-DJA Document 9 Filed 01/07/21 Page 1 of 1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 COREY D. CHRISTENSEN, 4 5 v. Plaintiff Case No.: 2:20-cv-01770-APG-DJA Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Case Without Prejudice 6 ROCHELLE T. NGUYEN and MATTHEW [ECF No. 8] LAY, 7 Defendants 8 On December 3, 2020, Magistrate Judge Albregts recommended that I dismiss this case 9 without prejudice because plaintiff Corey Christensen did not file an amended complaint by the 10 given deadline. ECF No. 8. Christensen did not object. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de 11 novo review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts 12 to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings 13 to which objection is made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) 14 (en banc) (“the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations 15 de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 16 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Albregts’ report and recommendation 17 (ECF No. 8) is accepted and this case is dismissed without prejudice. The clerk of court is 18 instructed to close this case. 19 DATED this 6th day of January, 2021. 20 21 22 23 ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?