Cox et al v. Lewis et al
Filing
14
ORDER Granting 12 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 7 Motion to Dismiss (Second Request). Replies due by 1/9/2021. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 1/8/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
Case 2:20-cv-01792-JCM-DJA Document 12 Filed 01/07/21 Page 1 of 2
14
01/08/21
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
C l r C ou nt choolD i rct
ak
yS
st i
O ffi of t Gener lC ou nsel
ce
he
a
Crystal J. Herrera, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12396
5100 West Sahara Avenue
Las Vegas, Nevada 89146
Telephone: (702) 799-5373
Facsimile: (702) 799-7243
herrec4@nv.ccsd.net
A torneys forC C SD D efend ant
t
s
12
10001 Park Run Drive
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
(702) 382-0711 FAX: (702) 382-5816
MARQUIS AURBACH COFFING
11
M a qu i A u r ch C offi
r s
ba
ng
Craig R. Anderson, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 6882
James A. Beckstrom, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 14032
10001 Park Run Drive
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
Telephone: (702) 382-0711
Facsimile: (702) 382-5816
canderson@maclaw.com
jbeckstrom@maclaw.com
13
UN I D S TA TE S D I TRI T C O URT
TE
S
C
14
D I TRI T O F N E V A D A
S
C
15
16
MICHELLE COX, individually, and as a parent
and next friend of M.C.,
17
Case Number:
2:20-cv-01792-JCM-DJA
Plaintiffs,
18
19
vs.
20
21
22
23
RYAN LEWIS, individually, and in his official
capacity, JORGE PALACIOS, individually, and
in his official capacity, and CLARK COUNTY
SCHOOL DISTRICT,
S TI UL A TI N A N D O RD E R TO
P
O
E X TE N D D E A D L I E FO R C C S D
N
D E FE N D A N TS TO FI E RE P L Y TO
L
P L A I TI S O P P O S I O N TO
N FF’
TI
M O TI N TO D I M I S [E C F N O .
O
S S
9]
(Second Request)
Defendants.
24
25
Defendants CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT (“CCSD”), Ryan Lewis (“Lewis”),
26
and Jorge Palacios (“Palacios”) (collectively “CCSD Defendants”), and Plaintiff Michelle Cox,
27
by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate to the following:
28
Page 1 of 2
MAC:1444-015 4246864 1/7/2021 1:56 PM
Case 2:20-cv-01792-JCM-DJA Document 12 Filed 01/07/21 Page 2 of 2
14
01/08/21
1
2
1.
(5) days to file their Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss.
3
4
The Parties hereby stipulate and agree that Defendant shall have an additional five
2.
Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss on December 4, 2020 (ECF No. 7) and
Plaintiff filed her Opposition on December 4, 2020 (ECF No. 9).
5
3.
The current deadline to Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to
6
Dismiss is January 4, 2021 and the requested extension would make the new deadline be January
7
9, 2021.
8
2.
This extension is the second request and is made in good faith and is not for the
9
purpose of delay.
10
12
10001 Park Run Drive
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
(702) 382-0711 FAX: (702) 382-5816
MARQUIS AURBACH COFFING
11
13
14
15
16
17
18
I I S O S TI UL A TE D .
T S
P
Dated this 7th day of January, 2021.
Dated this 7th day of January, 2021.
M A RQ UI A URB A C H C O FFI G
S
N
TH E B A C H L A W FI , L C
RM L
By: / ames A . eck rom
s/J
B
st
Craig R. Anderson, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 6882
James A. Beckstrom, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 14032
10001 Park Run Drive
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
A torneys forD efend ant
t
s
By: / ason J B ach
s/J
.
Jason J. Bach, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 7984
7881 W. Charleston Blvd., Suite 165
Las Vegas, NV 89117
A torneys forP l ntff
t
ai i
19
O RD E R
20
21
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
25
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
26
27
DATED:
January 8, 2021
28
Page 2 of 2
MAC:1444-015 4246864 1/7/2021 1:56 PM
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?