Cox et al v. Lewis et al

Filing 14

ORDER Granting 12 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 7 Motion to Dismiss (Second Request). Replies due by 1/9/2021. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 1/8/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Download PDF
Case 2:20-cv-01792-JCM-DJA Document 12 Filed 01/07/21 Page 1 of 2 14 01/08/21 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 C l r C ou nt choolD i rct ak yS st i O ffi of t Gener lC ou nsel ce he a Crystal J. Herrera, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12396 5100 West Sahara Avenue Las Vegas, Nevada 89146 Telephone: (702) 799-5373 Facsimile: (702) 799-7243 herrec4@nv.ccsd.net A torneys forC C SD D efend ant t s 12 10001 Park Run Drive Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 (702) 382-0711 FAX: (702) 382-5816 MARQUIS AURBACH COFFING 11 M a qu i A u r ch C offi r s ba ng Craig R. Anderson, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 6882 James A. Beckstrom, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 14032 10001 Park Run Drive Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 Telephone: (702) 382-0711 Facsimile: (702) 382-5816 canderson@maclaw.com jbeckstrom@maclaw.com 13 UN I D S TA TE S D I TRI T C O URT TE S C 14 D I TRI T O F N E V A D A S C 15 16 MICHELLE COX, individually, and as a parent and next friend of M.C., 17 Case Number: 2:20-cv-01792-JCM-DJA Plaintiffs, 18 19 vs. 20 21 22 23 RYAN LEWIS, individually, and in his official capacity, JORGE PALACIOS, individually, and in his official capacity, and CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, S TI UL A TI N A N D O RD E R TO P O E X TE N D D E A D L I E FO R C C S D N D E FE N D A N TS TO FI E RE P L Y TO L P L A I TI S O P P O S I O N TO N FF’ TI M O TI N TO D I M I S [E C F N O . O S S 9] (Second Request) Defendants. 24 25 Defendants CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT (“CCSD”), Ryan Lewis (“Lewis”), 26 and Jorge Palacios (“Palacios”) (collectively “CCSD Defendants”), and Plaintiff Michelle Cox, 27 by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate to the following: 28 Page 1 of 2 MAC:1444-015 4246864 1/7/2021 1:56 PM Case 2:20-cv-01792-JCM-DJA Document 12 Filed 01/07/21 Page 2 of 2 14 01/08/21 1 2 1. (5) days to file their Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. 3 4 The Parties hereby stipulate and agree that Defendant shall have an additional five 2. Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss on December 4, 2020 (ECF No. 7) and Plaintiff filed her Opposition on December 4, 2020 (ECF No. 9). 5 3. The current deadline to Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to 6 Dismiss is January 4, 2021 and the requested extension would make the new deadline be January 7 9, 2021. 8 2. This extension is the second request and is made in good faith and is not for the 9 purpose of delay. 10 12 10001 Park Run Drive Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 (702) 382-0711 FAX: (702) 382-5816 MARQUIS AURBACH COFFING 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 I I S O S TI UL A TE D . T S P Dated this 7th day of January, 2021. Dated this 7th day of January, 2021. M A RQ UI A URB A C H C O FFI G S N TH E B A C H L A W FI , L C RM L By: / ames A . eck rom s/J B st Craig R. Anderson, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 6882 James A. Beckstrom, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 14032 10001 Park Run Drive Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 A torneys forD efend ant t s By: / ason J B ach s/J . Jason J. Bach, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 7984 7881 W. Charleston Blvd., Suite 165 Las Vegas, NV 89117 A torneys forP l ntff t ai i 19 O RD E R 20 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 25 U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 26 27 DATED: January 8, 2021 28 Page 2 of 2 MAC:1444-015 4246864 1/7/2021 1:56 PM

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?