Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Fidelity National Title Insurance Company
Filing
30
ORDER granting 29 Stipulation; Re: 20 Motion for Summary Judgment Replies due by 2/5/2021. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 1/7/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
Case 2:20-cv-01887-RFB-EJY Document 30 Filed 01/07/21 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP
Darren T. Brenner, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 8386
Lindsay D. Robbins, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 13474
7785 W. Sahara Ave., Suite 200
Las Vegas, NV 89117
(702) 637-2345; Fax: (702) 946-1345
lrobbins@wrightlegal.net
dbrenner@wrightlegal.net
Attorneys for Plaintiff, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Successor By Merger To Wells Fargo Bank
Minnesota, N.A. F/K/A Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A., Solely As Trustee For Structured Asset
Mortgage Investments II Inc. Bear Stearns Mortgage Funding Trust 2007-AR5, Mortgage PassThrough Certificates, Series 2007-AR5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. SUCCESSOR
BY MERGER TO WELLS FARGO BANK
MINNESOTA, N.A. F/K/A NORWEST
BANK MINNESOTA, N.A., SOLELY AS
TRUSTEE FOR STRUCTURED ASSET
MORTGAGE INVESTMENTS II INC. BEAR
STEARNS MORTGAGE FUNDING TRUST
2007-AR5, MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH
CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-AR5,
18
19
20
21
22
23
Plaintiff,
Case No.: 2:20-cv-01887-RFB-EJY
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN
SUPPORT OF WELLS FARGO’S
COUNTER MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT [ECF No. 20]
[First Request]
vs.
FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE GROUP,
INC.; FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE
INSURANCE COMPANY; DOE
INDIVIDUALS I through X; and ROE
CORPORATIONS XI through XX, inclusive,
Defendants.
24
25
Pending before the Court is Defendant Fidelity National Title Insurance Company’s
26
Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 10) and Plaintiff Wells Fargo’s Countermotion for Partial Summary
27
Judgment (ECF No. 24). The Motion to Dismiss is fully briefed. The Reply in support of the
28
Countermotion for Summary Judgment, if any, would be due on January 6, 2021. ECF No. 28.
Page 1 of 2
Case 2:20-cv-01887-RFB-EJY Document 30 Filed 01/07/21 Page 2 of 2
1
Both motions rely, in part, on certain endorsements incorporated by reference but not attached
2
the subject title insurance Policy including with Wells Fargo’s Complaint. See ECF No. 1-1, pp.
3
31-32. Upon review, it is not clear if the parties were relying on the correct endorsements within
4
their briefing, and copies of the relevant endorsements are not included with the Policies
5
provided by the parties. See Id; see also ECF No. 4-2, pp. 2-14. For the sake of clarity if the
6
record, Wells Fargo has requested additional time to review and, if necessary, propose
7
appropriative corrective measures before any further briefing and resolution of the pending
8
motions. Accordingly, the parties stipulate and agree to a 30-day extension of time for Wells
9
Fargo’s Reply though and including February 5, 2021.
10
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
11
DATED this 5th day of January, 2021.
DATED this 5th day of January, 2021.
12
WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP
SINCLAIR BRAUN LLP
/s/ Darren T. Brenner, Esq.
Darren T. Brenner, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 8386
Lindsay D. Robbins, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 13474
7785 W. Sahara Ave., Suite 200
Las Vegas, NV 89117
Attorneys for Plaintiff, Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A. Successor By Merger To Wells Fargo
Bank Minnesota, N.A. F/K/A Norwest Bank
Minnesota, N.A., Solely As Trustee For
Structured Asset Mortgage Investments II Inc.
Bear Stearns Mortgage Funding Trust 2007AR5, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates,
Series 2007-AR5
/s/ Kevin Sinclair, Esq.
Kevin Sinclair, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12277
16501 Venture Boulevard, Suite 400
Encino, California 91436
Attorneys for Defendants, Fidelity
National Title Group, Inc. and Fidelity
National Title Insurance Company
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this _____ day of _____________, 2020.
7th
January, 2021.
25
26
________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
27
28
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?