Stanley v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA), Inc.

Filing 22

ORDER denying 15 Motion to Amend; ORDER accepting 18 Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 3/31/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 DONAVE STANLEY, 4 Plaintiff 5 v. 6 G4S SECURE SOLUTIONS (USA), INC., 7 8 Case No.: 2:20-cv-02358-APG-EJY Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Denying Motion to Amend [ECF Nos. 15, 18] Defendant On March 15, 2021, Magistrate Judge Youchah recommended that I deny plaintiff 9 Donave Stanley’s motion to amend. ECF No. 18. Stanley did not file an objection. Thus, I am 10 not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. 11 § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the 12 report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made”); United States v. Reyna13 Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the district judge must review the 14 magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not 15 otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 16 I THEREFORE ORDER that Judge Youchah’s report and recommendation (ECF No. 17 18) is accepted and plaintiff Donave Stanley’s motion to amend (ECF No. 15) is DENIED. 18 DATED this 31st day of March, 2021. 19 20 21 22 23 ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?