Quintana v. Clark County School District et al

Filing 15

ORDER granting 14 Stipulation to Extend Time to Reply to 6 Motion to Dismiss. Replies due by 2/24/2021. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 2/16/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)

Download PDF
Case 2:21-cv-00023-GMN-NJK Document 14 Filed 02/12/21 Page 1 of 2 15 02/16/21 1 2 3 4 5 6 CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL CRYSTAL J. HERRERA, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 12396 5100 West Sahara Avenue Las Vegas, Nevada 89146 Telephone: (702) 799-5373 Facsimile: (702) 799-7243 Herrec4@nv.ccsd.net Attorneys for Defendants 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 SARA QUINTANA, 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Case No.: 2:21-cv-00023-GMN-NJK Plaintiff, v. CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, a political subdivision of the State of Nevada, and the BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, in their official capacities, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO DISMISS (FIRST REQUEST) Defendants. 18 Plaintiff Sara Quintana and Defendants Clark County School District (“School 19 District”) and the Board of Trustees of the Clark County School District (“Board;” collectively, 20 “Defendants”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate to extend the 21 time for Defendants to file a reply in support of their Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 6) from the 22 current deadline of February 17, 2021 for seven (7) days, up to and including February 24, 23 2021. (ECF No. 13). This is the first request for an extension of time for this deadline. 24 Defendants seek the extension of time to allow sufficient time to prepare an appropriate 25 reply. Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss on January 13, 2021 (ECF No. 6). Plaintiff filed a 26 Response on February 10, 2021, after receiving a two-week extension (ECF No. 11). 27 Accordingly, the deadline for Defendants to file a reply in support of their Motion to Dismiss is 28 February 17, 2021. Counsel requires additional time to evaluate and address Plaintiff’s Case 2:21-cv-00023-GMN-NJK Document 14 Filed 02/12/21 Page 2 of 2 15 02/16/21 1 response to administrative exhaustion concerns. Defendants’ counsel will also be taking time 2 off through February 16, 2021 in light of the long weekend and will be unable to properly 3 evaluate and prepare a reply by the current responsive deadline. 4 Based on the foregoing, the parties hereby stipulate to a short extension of time, until 5 February 24, 2021, for Defendants to file a reply to their Motion to Dismiss. The one (1) week 6 extension will have no significant or prejudicial impact on the proceedings. This request is 7 made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay. 8 Dated: February 12, 2021. 9 CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL 10 By: Crystal J. Herrera Crystal J. Herrera (#12396) 5100 West Sahara Avenue Las Vegas, Nevada 89146 Attorney for Defendants 11 12 13 14 15 Dated: February 12, 2021. KEMP & KEMP 16 17 18 19 20 By: James P. Kemp James P. Kemp, Esq. (#6375) Victoria L. Neal, Esq. (#13382) 7435 W. Azure Dr., Ste. 110 Las Vegas, NV 89130 Attorney for Plaintiff 21 22 23 24 ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 16 day of February, 2021. __ 25 26 27 28 __________________________________ Gloria M. Navarro, District Judge United States District Court \ Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?