Christy v. Hutchings et al

Filing 13

ORDER Granting 12 Motion for Extension of Time to File Second Amended Petition. Second Amended Petition due by 8/2/2021. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 6/2/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - YAW)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 DERRELL LEE CHRISTY, JR., Case No.: 2:21-cv-00132-APG-BNW 4 ORDER Petitioner, 5 v. 6 WILLIAM HUTCHINGS, et al., 7 Respondents. 8 9 In this habeas corpus action, the petitioner, Derrell Lee Christy, Jr., represented by 10 appointed counsel, was due to file a second amended habeas petition by June 3, 2021. See Order 11 entered March 5, 2021 (ECF No. 11) (90 days to file second amended petition). 12 On June 1, 2021, Petitioner filed a motion for extension of time (ECF No. 12), requesting 13 a 60-day extension of time, to August 2, 2021, to file his second amended petition. This would 14 be the first extension of this deadline. Petitioner’s counsel states that the extension of time is 15 necessary because of the time required to obtain, organize, and review the record. Respondents 16 do not oppose the motion for extension of time. I find that the motion for extension of time is 17 made in good faith and not solely for the purpose of delay, and that there is good cause for the 18 extension of time. 19 /// 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 1 I THEREFORE ORDER that Petitioner’s Motion for Extension of Time (ECF No. 12) is 2 GRANTED. Petitioner will have until and including August 2, 2021, to file his second amended 3 petition for writ of habeas corpus. In all other respects, the schedule for further proceedings set 4 forth in the order entered March 5, 2021 (ECF No. 11) will remain in effect. 5 6 DATED: June 2, 2021 7 ________________________________ ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?