Minden et al v. Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company

Filing 253

ORDER granting 252 Stipulation for Extension of Time Regarding Briefing Deadlines Related to Pending Motions. Plaintiffs' Response to 247 Objection to Bill of Costs, 245 Motion for New Trial and 248 Motion to Amend/Correct due by 10/18/2024. Defendant's Replies due by 11/18/2024. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 9/23/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MAM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 James J. Pisanelli, Esq., Bar No. 4027 JJP@pisanellibice.com Todd L. Bice, Esq., Bar No. 4534 TLB@pisanellibice.com Jordan T. Smith, Esq., Bar No. 12097 JTS@pisanellibice.com Brianna Smith, Esq., Bar No. 11795 BGS@pisanellibice.com PISANELLI BICE PLLC 400 South 7th Street, Suite 300 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Telephone: 702.214.2100 Facsimile: 702.214.2101 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Michael Minden and Theresa Minden 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 12 MICHAEL MINDEN and THERESA MINDEN, CASE NO.: 2:21-cv-00151-APG-BNW 13 Plaintiffs, v. 15 ALLSTATE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois Corporation, (702) 382-2101 17 18 19 (702) 382-2101 14 16 (702) 382-2101 PISANELLI BICE 400 SOUTH 7TH STREET, SUITE 300 LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89101 9 STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING DEADLINES RELATED TO PENDING MOTIONS (ECF NOS. 245, 247, 248) (FIRST REQUEST) Defendant. Plaintiffs Michael Minden and Theresa Minden (“Plaintiffs”), and Defendant Allstate 20 Property and Casualty Insurance Company (“Defendant”), by and through their respective counsel, 21 for good cause shown, hereby stipulate to extend deadlines related to the following pending 22 motions. 23 1. On September 17, 2024, Defendant filed (1) Motion for a New Trial, Renewed 24 Judgment as a Matter of Law, Remittitur, to Alter and Amend the Judgment, and Grant Relief from 25 the Judgment (ECF No. 245); (2) Objections to Plaintiffs’ Bill of Costs (ECF No. 247); and (3) 26 Motion to Alter or Amend the Judgment to Reduce Fees and Costs (ECF No. 248). 27 28 2. Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendant’s Motions (ECF Nos. 245, 248) are due October 1, 2024, and Plaintiffs’ Response to Objections (ECF No. 247) is due on September 24, 2024. 1 1 3. The parties stipulate to extend the deadlines for Plaintiffs’ responses and 2 Defendant’s replies. Members of Plaintiffs’ appellate counsel will be out of the country from 3 September 20, 2024, through September 29, 2024. Therefore, Plaintiffs seek this extension in good 4 faith and not for purposes of delay as additional time is needed to adequately prepare the responses. 5 6 4. (ECF Nos. 245 and 248) and Objections (ECF No. 247) to October 18, 2024. 7 8 Therefore, the parties agree to extend Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendant’s Motions 5. The parties also agree to extend the deadline for Defendant’s Replies in support of the Motions (ECF Nos. 245 and 248) and Objections (ECF No. 247) to November 18, 2024. 9 10 DATED this 20th day of September 2024. DATED this 20th day of September 2024. 12 By: 13 14 15 /s/ Jordan T. Smith James J. Pisanelli, Bar No. 4097 Todd L. Bice, Bar No. 4534 Jordan T. Smith, Bar No. 12097 Brianna Smith, Bar No. 11795 PISANELLI BICE PLLC 400 South 7th Street, Suite 300 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 By: 18 19 (702) 382-2101 (702) 382-2101 17 /s/ Kory J. Koerperich Jonathan W. Carlson, Bar No. 10536 Michael A. Pintar, Bar No. 3789 MCCORMICK BARSTOW 8337 West Sunset Road, Suite 350 Las Vegas, Nevada 89113 Daniel F. Polsenberg, Bar No. 2376 Kory J. Koerperich, Bar No. 14559 LEWIS ROCA 3993 Howard Hughes Pkwy, Ste 600 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 16 (702) 382-2101 PISANELLI BICE 400 SOUTH 7TH STREET, SUITE 300 LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89101 11 I. Scott Bogatz, Esq. Michael S. Kelley 300 S. 4th Street, Ste. 830 Las Vegas, NV 89101 Attorneys for Defendants Attorneys for Plaintiff 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED: 22 23 24 HONORABLE ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 25 26 DATED: September 23, 2024 27 28 CASE NO: 2:21-cv-00151-APG-BNW 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?