Rosenbaum et al v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.

Filing 11

ORDER granting 10 Motion to Extend Time Re: 1 Complaint, Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. answer due 4/30/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 4/26/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP
Christina V. Miller, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12448
Ramir M. Hernandez, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 13146
7785 W. Sahara Ave., Suite 200
Las Vegas, NV 89117
[phone]; Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant, Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8
9
10

NATALIE C. ROSENBAUM AND RICHARD
A. ROSENBAUM,

11

13
14
15

JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND
DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT (THIRD
REQUEST)

Plaintiff,

12

Case No.: 2:21-cv-00162- KJD-VCF

vs.
SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC.,
Defendant.

16
17

Plaintiffs, Natalie C. Rosenbaum and Richard A. Rosenbaum (“Plaintiffs”), and

18

Defendant, Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (“SPS”) (collectively the “Parties”), by and through

19

their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

20

On January 30, 2021, Plaintiffs filed their Complaint [ECF No. 1]. SPS was served with

21

Plaintiff’s Complaint on February 2, 2021. The deadline for SPS to respond to Plaintiffs’

22

Complaint was February 23, 2021.

23

deadline to March 25, 2021 [ECF No. 7]. By stipulation of the parties, this Court extended that

24

deadline a second time to April 23, 2021 [ECF No. 9].

By stipulation of the parties, this Court extended that

25

The Parties have discussed extending the deadline for SPS to respond to Plaintiffs’

26

Complaint by an additional seven days to allow for the parties to continue discussing possible

27

resolution of the matter, including participation in a magistrate judge settlement conference.

28

WHEREAS, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree to extend the deadline for SPS to file

Page 1 of 3

1

its responsive pleading to Plaintiffs’ Complaint to April 30, 2021.

2

This is the third stipulation for extension of time for SPS to file its responsive pleading.

3

The extension is requested in good faith and is not for purposes of delay or prejudice to any other

4

party.

5

As part of this stipulation, SPS agrees to participate in any Rule 26(f) conference that

6

occurs during the pendency of this extension.

7

DATED this 23rd day of April, 2021.

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP

FREEDOM LAW FIRM

/s/ Ramir M. Hernandez
Christina V. Miller, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12448
Ramir M. Hernandez, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 13146
7785 W. Sahara Ave., Suite 200
Las Vegas, NV 89117
Attorneys for Defendant, Select Portfolio
Servicing, Inc.

/s/ George Haines
George Haines, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 9411
8985 S. Eastern Avenue, #350
Las Vegas, NV 89123
Attorneys for Plaintiffs, Natalie C.
Rosenbaum and Richard A. Rosenbaum

16
17
18
19
20

IT IS SO ORDERED:
___________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

21
22

DATED:

23
24
25
26
27
28

Page 2 of 3

4-26-2021
_________________________

Case 2:21-cv-00162-KJD-VCF Document 10 Filed 04/23/21 Page 3 of 3

1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

2

I HEREBY CERTIFY that I am an employee of WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP and

3

that I served the foregoing JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESOND TO

4

PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT (THIRD REQUEST) on the 23rd day of March, 2021, to all

5

parties on the CM/ECF service list.

6
7
8

/s/ Jason Craig
.
An Employee of WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Page 3 of 3