Johnson v. Johnson et al
Filing
17
ORDER DENYING 11 Petition for Writ of Mandamus, 12 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; and 16 Petition to Correct Prosecutorial Misconduct/Error. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 6/7/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
11
COREY JOHNSON,
12
13
14
Petitioner,
Case No. 2:21-cv-00219-GMN-BNW
ORDER
v.
CALVIN JOHNSON, et al.,
15
Respondents.
16
17
This is a closed habeas corpus matter under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. After giving petitioner
18
Johnson an opportunity to show cause, the court dismissed this action because Johnson had failed
19
to exhaust his state-court remedies. ECF No. 13. Johnson has since filed a petition for a writ of
20
mandamus (ECF No. 11), a petition for an emergency preliminary injunction (ECF No. 12), and a
21
petition to correct prosecutorial misconduct or error (ECF No. 16).
22
All of these petitions address the merits of Johnson's claims. None of them address the
23
reason why the court dismissed this action, for Johnson's failure to exhaust his state-court
24
remedies. The court cannot consider Johnson's claims until he has exhausted those remedies. 28
25
U.S.C. § 2254(b). The court thus denies these petitions.
26
To the extent that a certificate of appealability is necessary, reasonable jurists would not
27
find the court's conclusion to be debatable or wrong. The court will not issue a certificate of
28
appealability.
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that petitioner's petition for a writ of mandamus (ECF
No. 11) is DENIED.
IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that petitioner's petition for an emergency preliminary
injunction (ECF No. 12) is DENIED.
IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that petitioner's petition to correct prosecutorial misconduct
or error (ECF No. 16) is DENIED.
DATED: June 7, 2021
8
______________________________
GLORIA M. NAVARRO
United States District Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?