Stark v. State of Nevada et al

Filing 10

ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 8 the Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's case is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall close this case and enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 6/7/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 5 6 7 8 CHAD RYAN STARK, Plaintiff, vs. STATE OF NEVADA, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 2:21-cv-00220-GMN-BNW ORDER 9 10 Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States 11 Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler, (ECF No. 8), which recommends that Plaintiff’s case be 12 dismissed without prejudice. 13 Plaintiff has failed to update his address with the Court pursuant to Local Rule IA 3-1, 14 which provides that failure to comply may result in “the dismissal of the action, entry of default 15 judgment, or other sanctions as deemed appropriate by the court.” D. Nev. Local R. IA 3-1, 16 (See Mail Return, ECF No. 9). 17 A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a 18 United States Magistrate Judge made pursuant to Local Rule IB 1-4. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); 19 D. Nev. R. IB 3-2. Upon the filing of such objections, the Court must make a de novo 20 determination of those portions to which objections are made. Id. The Court may accept, reject, 21 or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge. 22 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Nev. IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, the Court is 23 not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an 24 objection.” Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Indeed, the Ninth Circuit has recognized 25 that a district court is not required to review a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation Page 1 of 2 1 where no objections have been filed. See, e.g., United States v. Reyna–Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 2 1122 (9th Cir. 2003). 3 4 Here, no objections were filed, and the deadline to do so has passed (See Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 8). 5 Accordingly, 6 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 8), is 7 ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full. 8 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s case is DISMISSED without prejudice. 9 The Clerk of Court shall close this case and enter judgment accordingly. 10 7 DATED this ________ day of June, 2020. 11 12 13 14 ____________________________ Gloria M. Navarro, District Judge United States District Court 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?