MST Mangagement LLC et al v. Chicago Doughnut Franchise Company, LLC et al
Filing
23
ORDER Granting #21 Stipulation to Extend Time re #1 Complaint (First Request). Bryan Morelle, Chicago Doughnut Franchise Company, LLC, Diversified Franchise Group, Inc, Marc Freeman, Mark Publicover, Montiedell "Monty" Maple, Ric McKown, and Steven Moulton answer due 6/7/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 4/1/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
Case 2:21-cv-00360-JAD-DJA Document 23 Filed 04/01/21 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Laura R. Jacobsen, Esq. (NV Bar No. 13699)
McDONALD CARANO LLP
100 W. Liberty Street, Tenth Floor
Reno, Nevada 89501
Telephone: 775-788-2000
Facsimile: 775-788-2020
ljacobsen@mcdonaldcarano.com
Jason C. McKenney, Esq. (TX Bar No. 24070245)
Kim Kearns, Esq. (TX Bar No. 24071217)
Mavish Bana, Esq. (TX Bar No. 24096653)
Admitted Pro Hac Vice
MAYER LLP
750 N. Saint Paul Street, Suite 700
Dallas, Texas 75201
Telephone: 214-379-6288
Facsimile: 214-379-6369
jmckenney@mayerllp.com
kkearns@mayerllp.com
mbana@mayerllp.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
13
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA
15
16
MST MANAGEMENT LLC; DENDARY’S
DONUTS, LLC; LYON & GREYBEAR
LENDING, LLC; and SKYELEE, LLC,
Plaintiffs,
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
vs.
CHICAGO DOUGHNUT FRANCHISE
COMPANY, LLC; DIVERSIFIED
FRANCHISE GROUP, INC., BRIAN
PAPPAS; JEFFREY PAPPAS; JACQUELINE
BALL; MARK PUBLICOVER;
MONTIEDELL “MONTY” MAPLE; BRYAN
MORELLE; MARC FREEMAN; RIC
McKOWN; and STEVEN MOULTON,
Case No. 2:21-cv-00360-JAD-DJA
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND TIME FOR CERTAIN
DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO THE
CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
(FIRST REQUEST)
Defendants.
25
Plaintiffs MST Management LLC, Dendary’s Donuts, LLC, Lyon & Greybear Lending,
26
LLC and Skyelee, LLC (“Plaintiffs”) by and through their undersigned counsel, and Defendants
27
Mark Publicover, Steven Moulton, Chicago Doughnut Franchise Company, LLC, Diversified
28
Franchise Group, Inc., Marc Freeman, Montiedell “Monty” Maple, Bryan Morelle, and Ric
Case 2:21-cv-00360-JAD-DJA Document 23 Filed 04/01/21 Page 2 of 2
1
McKown (collectively referred to as “Defendants”), by and through their undersigned counsel for
2
purposes of this stipulation, stipulate to extend the deadline for Defendants to answer or otherwise
3
respond to the Class Action Complaint (ECF No. 1) to and including May 3, 2021. The parties
4
further stipulate that Plaintiffs deadline to respond to any of the Defendants’ response to the Class
5
Action Complaint be extended 35 days after Defendants’ answer or response up to and including
6
June 7, 2021.
7
This is the parties’ first request to extend this deadline as the Defendants require additional
8
time to review the claims and investigate the facts. The undersigned hereby certify that this request
9
is not made for the purpose of delay.
10
Dated: March _31__, 2021
Dated: March _31__, 2021
11
McDONALD CARANO LLP
CONNOR KUDLAC LEE PLLC
By:
/s/ Laura R. Jacobsen
Laura R. Jacobsen, Esq. (NV Bar No. 13699)
100 W. Liberty Street, 10th Floor
Reno, Nevada 89501
ljacobsen@mcdonaldcarano.com
By:
/s/ Cabrach Connor
Cabrach Connor (TX Bar No.24036390)
Pro Hac Vice Application Forthcoming
609 Castle Ridge Road, Suite 450
Austin, Texas 78746
cab@connorkudlaclee.com
12
13
14
15
20
MAYER LLP
Jason C. McKenney, Esq. (TX Bar
No.24070245)
Kim Kearns, Esq. (TX Bar No. 24071217)
Mavish Bana, Esq. (TX Bar No. 24096653)
750 N. Saint Paul Street, Suite 700
Dallas, Texas 75201
jmckenney@mayerllp.com
kkearns@mayerllp.com
mbana@mayerllp.com
21
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
16
17
18
19
Attorney for Defendants
CHICAGO DOUGHNUT FRANCHISE
COMPANY, LLC, DIVERSIFIED
FRANCHISE GROUP, INC., MARK
PUBLICOVER, MONTIEDELL “MONTY”
MAPLE, BRYAN MORELLE, MARC
FREEMAN, RIC McKOWN and STEVEN
MOULTON
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
26
27
28
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
DANIEL J. ALBREGTS
U.S. MAGISTRATEMAGISTRATE JUDGE
UNITED STATES COURT JUDGE
DATED:
April 1, 2021
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?