Villafana v. T-Mobile et al

Filing 21

ORDER Granting 17 Stipulation Regarding Timeliness of Filing from EEOC Right to Sue. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 9/8/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)

Case 2:21-cv-00661-GMN-DJA Document 17 Filed 08/31/21 Page 1 of 2
21
09/08/21

1
2
3
4
5

Law Office of Mary F. Chapman, Ltd.
Mary F. Chapman, Esq.
Nevada Bar #6591
8440 West Lake Mead Blvd.
Suite 203
Las Vegas, Nevada 89128
702-202-4223 Phone
702-202-2003 Fax
[e-mail]
UNITED STATES DISTRI CT COURT

6

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

7
8

TERI VILLAFANA,
Plaintiff,

9
10
11
12

Case No. 2:21-cv-00661-GMN-DJA

vs.
T-Mobile,
Defendant.

STIPULATION AND ORDER
REGARDING TIMELINESS OF
FILING FROM EEOC RIGHT TO SUE

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Plaintiff, Teri Villafana, and Defendant, T-Mobile, by and through respective counsel,
file this Stipulation and Order stipulating in good faith as follows:
Plaintiff’s claims for race discrimination and retaliation as specifically set forth in her
EEOC Charges of Discrimination (EEOC Nos. 487-2020-01309 and 487-2020-00138 (ECF No.
5 at pp. 6-7) were filed within 90 days of Plaintiff’s receipt of the EEOC right to sue notices.
This stipulation is based upon Plaintiff’s representation that her actual receipt of the
EEOC right to sue notices for the above-referenced Charges was January 29, 2021, and is
further based upon the Nevada Governor’s Emergency Directive 009 Section 2 providing tolling
of Nevada state statutes of limitations. The Parties wish to resolve the single issue of Plaintiff’s
timely filing of these specific race discrimination and retaliation claims in Federal Court. The
stipulation on this singular fact is without waiving any other defense Defendant may have to any
claims in this matter including but not limited to timeliness of filing the original charges with
the EEOC/NERC, timeliness of any other claims, exhaustion of administrative remedies, or any
other substantive or procedural defenses.

The parties submit that this stipulation is made in

good faith and intended to promote judicial economy.
1

Case 2:21-cv-00661-GMN-DJA Document 17 Filed 08/31/21 Page 2 of 2
21
09/08/21

1

DATED this 31th of August, 2021.

DATED this 31th of August, 2021.

2

LAW OFFICE OF MARY F. CHAPMAN,
LTD.

LITTLER MENDELSON

By: /s/ Mary F. Chapman
Mary F. Chapman, Esq.
8440 W. Lake Mead Blvd.
Suite 203
Las Vegas, NV 89128
[phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff

By: /s/ Amy L. Thompson
Amy L. Thompson, Esq.
Montgomery Y. Paek, Esq.
3960 Howard Hughes Parkway
Suite 300
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendant

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

ORDER

14

IT IS SO ORDERED.

15
16

8
Dated this __ day of September, 2021.

17
18
19
20

_____________________________
Gloria M. Navarro, District Judge
United States District Court

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2