Robinson v. Social Security
Filing
12
ORDER Granting 11 Motion to Extend Time. Commissioner Of Social Security answer due 11/9/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 9/7/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
Case 2:21-cv-00721-DJA Document 11 Filed 09/03/21 Page 1 of 4
12
09/07/21
9
1
2
3
CHRISTOPHER CHIOU
Acting United States Attorney
District of Nevada
6
DANIEL P. TALBERT, SBN OH 0084088
Special Assistant United States Attorney
160 Spear Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (510) 970-4860
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
E-Mail: Daniel.Talbert@ssa.gov
7
Attorneys for Defendant
4
5
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
12
DANE S. ROBINSON,
13
Plaintiff,
14
15
16
vs.
KILOLO KIJAKAZI,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.1
17
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 2:21-cv-00721-DJA
UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR A SECOND
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE CERTIFIED
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD AND ANSWER;
DECLARATION OF JEBBY RASPUTNIS
(SECOND REQUEST)
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
1
Kilolo Kijakazi became the Acting Commissioner of Social Security on July 9, 2021. Pursuant to Rule
25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Kilolo Kijakazi should be substituted, therefore, for
Andrew Saul as the defendant in this suit. No further action need be taken to continue this suit by reason
of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
Case 2:21-cv-00721-DJA Document 11 Filed 09/03/21 Page 2 of 4
12
09/07/21
9
1
Defendant, Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”), by
2
and through his undersigned attorneys, hereby moves for a first sixty-day extension of time to file the
3
Certified Administrative Record (CAR) and answer to Plaintiff’s Complaint. The CAR and answer to
4
Plaintiff’s Complaint are due to be filed by September 10, 2021.
5
Defendant makes this request in good faith and for good cause, because the CAR, which must be
6
filed with the Answer and is necessary to adjudicate the case, is not yet available. The public health
7
emergency pandemic caused by COVID-19 has significantly impacted operations in the Social Security
8
Administration’s Office of Appellate Operations (OAO) in Falls Church, Virginia, which is responsible
9
for producing the CAR that must be filed with the Answer, per 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and (h). As detailed
10
in the attached declarations from Jebby Rasputnis, Executive Director of the OAO, beginning mid-March
11
2020, OAO restricted physical access to the Falls Church building, which impacted the production of
12
CARs because physical access was previously required to produce CARs. OAO has since developed and
13
employed a new business process to produce CARs. Much of the difficulty in producing CARs stemmed
14
from the old process of transmitting hearing recording to vendors for transcription, how the vendors
15
transcribed the recordings, and how the vendors provided the completed transcripts to OAO. OAO
16
changed this process by reworking how the audio files are submitted, seeking additional vendor capacity,
17
and increasing in-house transcription capacity. With these changes, OAO is now able to produce more
18
than 700 transcripts a week, a significant increase over the pre-COVID-19 average of 300-400 hearing
19
transcripts a week.
20
Despite these improvements, OAO still faces a significant backlog of cases due to the combined
21
effects of pandemic-related disruption and a marked increase in district court filings (up almost 800 cases
22
per month, a 54% increase). Overall, the timeframe for delivering a CAR in an individual case has
23
improved. Because of this, OAO is making progress in its backlog of cases. At the end of January 2021
24
OAO had 11,111 pending cases. As of August 9, 2021, OAO had 3,760 pending cases, representing a
25
decrease in our backlog of nearly 7,350 cases over seven months. OAO continues to work on increasing
26
productivity by collaborating with our vendors and searching out and utilizing technological
Unopposed Mot. for Ext.; No. 2:21-cv-00721-DJA
Case 2:21-cv-00721-DJA Document 11 Filed 09/03/21 Page 3 of 4
12
09/07/21
9
1
enhancements. Defendant asks this Court for its continued patience as OAO works to increase its
2
efficiency and production of CARs, reduce the current backlog, and address rising court case filings.
3
Counsel for Defendant further states that the Office of General Counsel (OGC) is monitoring receipt of
4
transcripts on a daily basis and is committed to filing Answers promptly upon receipt and review of the
5
administrative records.
6
Given the volume of pending cases, Defendant requests an extension in which to respond to the
7
Complaint until November 9, 2021. If Defendant is unable to produce the certified administrative record
8
necessary to file an Answer in accordance with this Order, Defendant shall request an additional
9
extension prior to the due date.
10
On September 2, 2021, the undersigned conferred with Plaintiff’s counsel, who has no opposition
11
to the requested extension. It is therefore respectfully requested that Defendant be granted an extension of
12
time to file the CAR and answer to Plaintiff’s Complaint, through and including November 9, 2021.
13
14
15
Dated: September 3, 2021
16
Respectfully submitted,
CHRISTOPHER CHIOU
Acting United States Attorney
17
/s/ Daniel P. Talbert
DANIEL P. TALBERT
Special Assistant United States Attorney
18
19
20
IT IS SO ORDERED:
21
22
23
HON. DANIEL J. ALBREGTS
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
24
September 7, 2021
DATED: ___________________________
25
26
Unopposed Mot. for Ext.; No. 2:21-cv-00721-DJA
Case 2:21-cv-00721-DJA Document 11 Filed 09/03/21 Page 4 of 4
12
09/07/21
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, the undersigned, am a citizen of the United States and am at least eighteen years of age. My
business address is 160 Spear Street, Suite 800, San Francisco, California 94105. I am not a party to the
above-entitled action. On the date set forth below, I caused service of UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR
A FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD AND
ANSWER; DECLARATION OF JEBBY RASPUTNIS on the following parties by electronically
7
filing the foregoing with the Clerk of the District Court using its ECF System, which provides electronic
8
notice of the filing:
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Hal Taylor
haltaylorlawyer@gbis.com
Mark D. Bennett
Mark@mydisabilityattorney.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Dated: September 3, 2021
16
/s/ Daniel P. Talbert
DANIEL P. TALBERT
Special Assistant United States Attorney
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Unopposed Mot. for Ext.; No. 2:21-cv-00721-DJA
Case 2:21-cv-00721-DJA Document 11-1 Filed 09/07/21 Page 51of 95
Case 2:21-cv-00721-DJA Document 12 Filed 09/03/21 Page of
DECLARATION OF JEBBY RASPUTNIS
OFFICE OF APPELLATE OPERATIONS
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
I, JEBBY RASPUTNIS, Executive Director of the Social Security Administration’s Office of
Appellate Operations (OAO), declare and state as follows:
1) My office is responsible for, among other things, preparing certified copies of
administrative records (CARs) for Federal court review when claimants appeal the final
decisions of the Commissioner of Social Security.
2) Beginning in mid-March of 2020, the Social Security Administration (agency) restricted
physical access to our buildings because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Since that time,
OAO has been working to overhaul, redo, refine, and streamline our business processes
to continue operations and meet our mission to serve the public. Despite many
challenges in transitioning to a completely new business process, we have reached and
surpassed pre-pandemic levels of CAR production. Much of the delay and uncertainty in
the CAR production process has stemmed from how we transmit hearing recordings to
our vendors, and how our vendors return completed transcripts to us. We have worked
hard to refine this process as well as implementing new processes, updating vendor
agreements, and making staffing changes. These included:
•
reworking how we transmit the audio files to our vendors from a fully in-person
exchange of CDs and completed transcripts to a now fully direct access and
electronic exchange of completed transcripts;
•
seeking additional vendor capacity;
•
leveraging in-house transcription capacity by establishing a transcription cadre
with updated technology and working with agency closed captioners; and
Page 1 of 5
Case 2:21-cv-00721-DJA Document 11-1 Filed 09/07/21 Page 62of 95
Case 2:21-cv-00721-DJA Document 12 Filed 09/03/21 Page of
•
working to add even more vendor production capacity.
3) After our newest vendors begin production, we anticipate being able to routinely produce
over 700 transcripts per week. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, we averaged 300-400
hearing transcriptions per week.
4) As we worked to transition this workload, and our external vendors, to a fully virtual
process, the number of new cases filed in federal court also increased. 1 This was a direct
result of the agency’s initiative to reduce the number of requests for administrative
review pending before the Appeals Council, the final step of the administrative process.
While we had planned for this increase, the combined effects of the pandemic-related
disruptions and the increase in new court filings lead to a significant backlog in CAR
preparation. However, as a result of our process improvements, increased production
capacity from our contracted transcription vendors, and the number of new cases filed in
federal court returning to normal levels, we now have begun reducing our pending
backlog. At the end of January 2021 we had 11,109 pending cases. As of August 09,
2021 we had 3,760 pending cases, representing a decrease in our backlog of nearly 7,350
cases over the last seven months.
1
In the last quarter of fiscal year 2020 and the first quarter of fiscal year 2021, we averaged more
than 2,257 new case receipts per month, compared to an average of 1,458 new case receipts in
the last quarter of fiscal year 2019 and the first quarter of fiscal year 2020. See also Chief
Justice Roberts’ 2020 Year-End Report on the Federal Judiciary, Appendix Workload of the
Courts, available at https://www.supremecourt.gov/publicinfo/year-end/2020year-endreport.pdf
(“Cases with the United States as defendant grew 16% [in FY20], primarily reflecting increases
in social security cases and prisoner petitions.”)
Page 2 of 5
Case 2:21-cv-00721-DJA Document 11-1 Filed 09/07/21 Page 73of 95
Case 2:21-cv-00721-DJA Document 12 Filed 09/03/21 Page of
The following chart shows OAO’s receipts, dispositions 2 and pending CAR workload for
the last seven months of FY2021.
Time Period
New Court Case
Receipts
Dispositions
Pending
JAN 2021
2,636
1,767
11,109
FEB 2021
1,880
2,312
10,677
MAR 2021
1,592
2,811
9,458
APR 2021
2,169
2,876
8,751
MAY 2021
1,298
2,551
7,498
JUNE 2021
950
2,206
6,242
JULY 2021
1,202
3,137
4,307
5) OAO continues to address the significant workflow fluctuations the agency has
experienced since approximately March 2020. The following line graph tracks three
different workflow measures since the beginning of FY2019 and how they intersect:
a. Green: requests for review decided by the Appeals Council;
b. Blue: new federal court cases about which the Appeals Council has been notified;
and
c. Gold: CARs docketed by the Office of the General Counsel (OGC). 3
2
While dispositions primarily include CARs for filing with the court, it also includes requests for
remand to the ALJ for further actions, and other actions.
https://www.ssa.gov/appeals/DataSets/08_National_New_Court_Cases_and_Remands.html.
3
For Appeals Council dispositions (green line) and new federal court case about which the
Appeals Council has been notified (blue line), the graph is based on publicly-available data that
is published quarterly. See https://www.ssa.gov/appeals/publicusefiles.html. The data for CAR
Page 3 of 5
Case 2:21-cv-00721-DJA Document 11-1 Filed 09/07/21 Page 84of 95
Case 2:21-cv-00721-DJA Document 12 Filed 09/03/21 Page of
The graph shows the deviation from the average for each of these three workflow
measures. 4 Notably, this visual representation illustrates the rapid changes that began in
March 2020 through July 2021.
SSA workload impact on Federal court cases
150.00%
100.00%
50.00%
0.00%
-50.00%
Oct-18
Nov-18
Dec-18
Jan-19
Feb-19
Mar-19
Apr-19
May-19
Jun-19
Jul-19
Aug-19
Sep-19
Oct-19
Nov-19
Dec-19
Jan-20
Feb-20
Mar-20
Apr-20
May-20
Jun-20
Jul-20
Aug-20
Sep-20
Oct-20
Nov-20
Dec-20
Jan-21
Feb-21
Mar-21
Apr-21
May-21
Jun-21
Jul-21
-100.00%
AC RR dispos vs. avg
NCCs vs. avg
CARs vs. avg
6) Due to the volume of work as well as the multiple changes to our business process, we
have experienced challenges consistently prioritizing the oldest cases first. We are now
pleased to report that we have provided CARs to OGC for all new court cases, that are
stored electronically, in which we were notified by OGC prior to December 31, 2020.
We will continue to establish goals to reach targeted benchmarks for prioritizing the
oldest cases.
7) With respect to the small number of our cases, less than 1%, that are kept in paper
because the claim originated before the inception of our Electronic Disability Collect
docketing (gold line), is drawn from the agency’s internal case tracking systems. All data sets,
while presumed valid, may change subject to updating and ongoing validation.
4
The averages are calculated since October 2018. By way of example, in March 2020, OGC
docketed about 80% fewer CARs than average, while the Appeals Council acted on about 60%
more requests for review than average.
Page 4 of 5
Case 2:21-cv-00721-DJA Document 11-1 Filed 09/07/21 Page 95of 95
Case 2:21-cv-00721-DJA Document 12 Filed 09/03/21 Page of
System, or because the claim involves something other than disability (e.g. denial of
Retirement or Survivor’s benefits or denial of a request to waive recovery of
overpayment), we continue to make significant progress. Although we must still process
these cases by hand 5 and on site, our minimal on-site staff has been able to attend to more
of these cases, as the backlog of our electronic CARs has declined. In January 2021, we
had 109 paper claims files pending. Currently, we have 34 paper claims files pending
and we have provided CARs to OGC for all new court cases that are stored in paper, in
which we were notified by OGC prior to December 31, 2020.
8) Although we remain subject to some constraints, we continue to work on increasing
productivity, and our aged-order case processing, by collaborating with our vendors and
searching out and utilizing technological enhancements. We ask for continued patience
as we work to increase our efficiency and production of CARs to reduce the current
backlog.
In accordance with 28 U.S.C. §1746, I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true
and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Dated: August 10, 2021
______________________________
/s/
Jebby Rasputnis
5
Once a paper claims is located and received in OAO’s office, the next step in the process of
creating a CAR is the in-office, in person labor of photocopying or scanning each page of
evidence in the paper file. This can take several hours or days and can only be done in OAO’s
office, where records can be kept confidential with agency photocopying and high-speed
scanning equipment.
Page 5 of 5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?