Thornton v. Portola Del Sol Operator, LLC et al
Filing
123
ORDER Granting 122 Stipulation for Extension of Time. AMC's deadline to respond to the Second Amended Complaint is extended until two weeks after the Court decides the Parties' forthcoming motion to approval settlement. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 12/11/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - RJDG)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Snell
& Wilmer
___________
___________
L.L.P.
LAW OFFICES
1700 South Pavilion Center Drive , Suite 700
Las Vegas, Nev ada 8913 5
702.784 .5200
11
12
Amy F. Sorenson, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12495
SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
15 West South Temple, Suite 1200
Salt Lake City, UT 84101
Telephone: (801) 257-1900
Facsimile: (801) 257-1800
asorenson@swlaw.com
Kelly H. Dove, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 10569
Gil Kahn, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 14220
SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
1700 South Pavilion Center Drive, Suite 700
Las Vegas, NV 89135
Telephone: (702) 784-5200
Facsimile: (702) 784-5252
kdove@swlaw.com
gkahn@swlaw.com
Attorneys for Defendants Apartment Management
Consultants, LLC, and Rene Richardson
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel.
PEGGY THORNTON, Relator,
Case No. 2:21-cv-01123-APG-BNW
and
Stipulation and Order to Extend Deadline
for Defendants Apartment Management
Consultants, LLC and Rene Richardson to
Respond to the Second Amended
Complaint
PEGGY THORNTON,
Plaintiff,
vs.
PORTOLA DEL SOL OPERATOR, LLC, a
foreign limited-liability company; TMIF II
PORTOLA, LLC, a foreign limited-liability
company; APARTMENT MANAGEMENT
CONSULTANTS, LLC, a foreign limited
liability company; and RENE
RICHARDSON, as AGENT of PORTOLA
DEL SOL OPERATOR, LLC,
Defendants.
(Fifth Request)
1
Relator Peggy Thornton and Defendants Apartment Management Consultants, LLC and
2
Rene Richardson (collectively “AMC”), by and through their respective undersigned counsel,
3
hereby stipulate to extend AMC’s deadline to respond to Ms. Thornton’s Second Amended
4
Complaint (“SAC”), until two weeks after the Court decides Ms. Thornton and AMC’s
5
forthcoming joint motion to approve settlement.
6
1.
Ms. Thornton filed her SAC on September 24, 2024. ECF No. 108.
7
2.
Under FRCP 15, AMC’s response to the SAC was therefore due on October 8,
3.
The Parties stipulated to grant AMC an additional three weeks to assess the SAC
8
Snell
& Wilmer
___________
___________
L.L.P.
LAW OFFICES
1700 South Pavilion Center Drive , Suite 700
Las Vegas, Nev ada 8913 5
702.784 .5200
9
2024.
10
given the multiple rounds of motion-to-dismiss briefing filed thus far and in light of AMC’s
11
counsels’ conflicting work travel. ECF No. 113.
12
13
14
4.
The Parties subsequently stipulated to grant AMC additional time to respond to the
SAC due to unexpected scheduling conflicts. ECF No. 115.
5.
Ms. Thornton and AMC engaged in settlement discussions during the intervening
15
period and received two extensions to AMC’s answering deadline to provide the United States
16
time to review the settlement offer, as required under the FCA.
17
Nos. 125–26.
18
6.
19
20
21
22
ECF Nos. 118-19; ECF
Ms. Thornton and AMC have agreed on a settlement amount, but as explained
immediately below, they require Court approval of the settlement.
7.
As of this writing, the United Stated has not stated whether it has any objection to
the proposed settlement terms.
8.
Although no objection is anticipated, Ms. Thornton and AMC will submit a joint
23
motion to the Court in the coming days, asking it to approve the settlement, which will provide
24
the United States an opportunity to object.
25
9.
Because preventing AMC from expending additional attorney’s fees to respond to
26
the SAC during that period would be conducive to settlement, the Parties agree it is in their
27
mutual best interest and judicial economy to likewise extend that response until after the Court
28
decides the settlement motion.
-2-
1
10.
The Parties request a two-week extension from the date of the Court’s decision on
2
their forthcoming settlement motion to accommodate the finalization and execution of a written
3
settlement agreement.
4
5
11.
AMC, with prejudice, thus mooting its need to respond to the SAC.
6
7
If the Court approves the settlement, Ms. Thornton will dismiss her claims against
12.
The Parties agree that this stipulation is entered into in good faith and will not
unduly delay proceedings.
8
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
9
10
Snell
& Wilmer
___________
___________
L.L.P.
LAW OFFICES
1700 South Pavilion Center Drive , Suite 700
Las Vegas, Nev ada 8913 5
702.784 .5200
11
Dated: December 10, 2024.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
By:
Dated: December 10, 2024.
SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
NEVADA LEGAL SERVICES
/s/ Gil Kahn ________________
Amy F. Sorenson, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12495
15West South Temple, Suite 1200
Salt Lake City, UT 84101
By: /s/ Elizabeth S. Carmona
Kristopher Pre
Nevada Bar. No. 14106
Elizabeth S. Carmona
Nevada Bar No. 14687
530 South 6th Street
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Kelly H. Dove, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 10569
Gil Kahn
Nevada Bar No. 14220
1700 South Pavilion Center Drive,
Suite 700
Las Vegas, NV 89135
Telephone: (702) 784-5200
Attorneys for Relator
Attorneys for Defendant Apartment
Management Consultants, LLC and Rene
Richardson
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
________
ORDER
1
2
Good cause appearing, Ms. Thornton and AMC’s stipulation is GRANTED. AMC’s
3
deadline to respond to the Second Amended Complaint is extended until two weeks after the
4
Court decides the Parties’ forthcoming motion to approval settlement.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DATED: 12/11/2024
10
Snell
& Wilmer
___________
___________
L.L.P.
LAW OFFICES
1700 South Pavilion Center Drive , Suite 700
Las Vegas, Nev ada 8913 5
702.784 .5200
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4-
1
2
I, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury, that I am over the age of eighteen
3
(18) years, and I am not a party to, nor interested in, this action. On this date, I caused to be
4
served a true and correct copy of the foregoing Stipulation and Order to Extend Deadline for
5
Defendants Apartment Management Consultants, LLC and Rene Richardson to Respond to
6
the Second Amended Complaint (Fifth Request) by method indicated below:
7
8
9
10
L.L.P.
LAW OFFICES
1700 South Pavilion Center Drive , Suite 700
Las Vegas, Nev ada 8913 5
702.784 .5200
11
Snell
& Wilmer
___________
___________
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
12
13
?
BY FAX: by transmitting via facsimile the document(s) listed above to the fax
number(s) set forth below on this date before 5:00 p.m. pursuant to EDCR Rule 7.26(a).
A printed transmission record is attached to the file copy of this document(s).
?
BY U.S. MAIL: by placing the document(s) listed above in a sealed envelope with
postage thereon fully prepaid, in the United States mail at Las Vegas, Nevada addressed
as set forth below.
?
BY OVERNIGHT MAIL: by causing document(s) to be picked up by an overnight
delivery service company for delivery to the addressee(s) on the next business day.
?
BY PERSONAL DELIVERY: by causing personal delivery by, a messenger service
with which this firm maintains an account, of the document(s) listed above to the
person(s) at the address(es) set forth below.
?
BY ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION: submitted to the above-entitled Court for
electronic filing and service upon the Court’s Service List for the above-referenced case.
?
BY EMAIL: by emailing a PDF of the document listed above to the email addresses of
the individual(s) listed below.
14
15
16
17
18
19
DATED December 10, 2024
/s/ Tiy Lewis
An employee of SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
20
21
22
23
24
25
4876-6853-6055
26
27
28
-5-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?