Thornton v. Portola Del Sol Operator, LLC et al
Filing
23
ORDER granting 22 Motion to Extend Time Re: 1 Complaint, Apartment Management Consultants, LLC answer due 2/21/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 2/7/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)
Case 2:21-cv-01123-APG-BNW Document 22 Filed 02/06/23 Page 1 of 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Snell & Wilmer
L.L.P.
LAW OFFICES
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
702.784.5200
11
Amy F. Sorenson, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12495
SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
15 West South Temple, Suite 1200
Salt Lake City, UT 84101
Telephone: (801) 257-1900
Facsimile: (801) 257-1800
asorenson@swlaw.com
Kelly H. Dove, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 10569
SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, NV 89169
Telephone: (702) 784-5200
Facsimile: (702) 784-5252
kdove@swlaw.com
Attorneys for Defendant
Apartment Management Consultants, LLC
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
14
15
16
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel.
PEGGY THORNTON, Realtor,
Case No. 2:21-cv-01123-APG-BNW
17
and
18
PEGGY THORNTON,
JOINT MOTION AND PROPOSED
ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO
FILE RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT
19
Plaintiff,
20
vs.
21
PORTOLA DEL SOL OPERATOR, LLC, a
foreign limited-liability company; TMIF II
PORTOLA, LLC, a foreign limited-liability
company; APARTMENT MANAGEMENT
CONSULTANTS, LLC, a foreign limited
liability company; and RENE
RICHARDSON, as AGENT of PORTOLA
DEL SOL OPERATOR, LLC,
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Defendants.
(First Request)
Case 2:21-cv-01123-APG-BNW Document 22 Filed 02/06/23 Page 2 of 4
1
Plaintiff Peggy Thornton (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Apartment Management Consultants,
2
LLC (“Defendant” or “AMC”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their undersigned
3
counsel, for good cause shown, hereby jointly move and agree to extend AMC’s deadline to file its
4
response to Plaintiff’s Complaint [ECF No. 1] from January 18, 2023, to February 21, 2023 for the
5
following reasons:
6
1.
Plaintiff filed the Complaint on June 14, 2021 [ECF No. 1].
7
2.
AMC’s response to the Complaint was originally due on January 18, 2023.
8
3.
The Parties informally agreed to extend the deadline to respond to February 1, 2023.
9
4.
Undersigned counsel, Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. was retained to represent AMC on or
10
about January 26, 2023.
Snell & Wilmer
L.L.P.
LAW OFFICES
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
702.784.5200
11
12
5.
The Parties jointly move and agree to extend the deadline for AMC to respond to
the Complaint to and including February 21, 2023.
13
6.
This extension request is supported by good cause. Specifically, as AMC’s counsel
14
was just retained, they require sufficient time to evaluate and investigate the allegations in the
15
Complaint. Additionally, AMC’s lead counsel has a trial beginning on February 8, 2023, which
16
will require substantial time.
17
18
7.
This extension request is sought in good faith and is not made for the purpose of
delay.
19
20
///
21
22
///
23
24
///
25
26
///
27
28
///
-2-
Case 2:21-cv-01123-APG-BNW Document 22 Filed 02/06/23 Page 3 of 4
1
2
THEREFORE, the Parties respectfully request an extension for AMC to file its response to
the Complaint until February 21, 2023.
3
Dated: February 6, 2023
Dated: February 6, 2023
4
NEVADA LEGAL SERVICES, INC.
SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
By: /s/ Elizabeth S. Carmona
/s/ Kristopher S. Pre
Elizabeth S. Cardona, Esq.
Kristopher S. Pre, Esq.
530 S. 6th St.
Las Vegas, NV 89101
By: /s/ Kelly H. Dove
Amy F. Sorenson, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12495
SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
15 West South Temple, Suite 1200
Salt Lake City, UT 84101
5
6
7
8
9
Attorneys for Plaintiff Peggy Thornton
Kelly H. Dove, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 10569
SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, NV 89169
10
Snell & Wilmer
L.L.P.
LAW OFFICES
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
702.784.5200
11
12
Attorneys for Defendant Apartment
Management Consultants, LLC
13
14
15
16
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED
DATED: 10:31 am, February 07, 2023
DATED: this ____ day of February, 2023.
18
19
UNITED
STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
BRENDA
WEKSLER
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
Case 2:21-cv-01123-APG-BNW Document 22 Filed 02/06/23 Page 4 of 4
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
I, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury, that I am over the age of eighteen (18)
3
years, and I am not a party to, nor interested in, this action. On this date, I caused to be served a
4
true and correct copy of the foregoing JOINT MOTION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO
5
EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT by method indicated below:
6
7
BY FAX: by transmitting via facsimile the document(s) listed above to the fax
number(s) set forth below on this date before 5:00 p.m. pursuant to EDCR Rule 7.26(a).
A printed transmission record is attached to the file copy of this document(s).
BY U.S. MAIL: by placing the document(s) listed above in a sealed envelope with
postage thereon fully prepaid, in the United States mail at Las Vegas, Nevada addressed
as set forth below.
BY OVERNIGHT MAIL: by causing document(s) to be picked up by an overnight
delivery service company for delivery to the addressee(s) on the next business day.
BY PERSONAL DELIVERY: by causing personal delivery by, a messenger service
with which this firm maintains an account, of the document(s) listed above to the
person(s) at the address(es) set forth below.
BY ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION: submitted to the above-entitled Court for
electronic filing and service upon the Court’s Service List for the above-referenced case.
BY EMAIL: by emailing a PDF of the document listed above to the email addresses of
the individual(s) listed below.
8
9
10
Snell & Wilmer
L.L.P.
LAW OFFICES
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
702.784.5200
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
DATED February 6, 2023
18
/s/ Maricris Williams
An employee of SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
19
20
4870-8024-7118
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?