Thornton v. Portola Del Sol Operator, LLC et al

Filing 46

ORDER Granting 45 Stipulation to Extend Deadline to Reply to 38 Motion to Dismiss. Replies due by 4/27/2023. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 4/11/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KF)

Download PDF
Case 2:21-cv-01123-APG-BNW Document 46 Filed 04/11/23 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Rory T. Kay (NSBN 12416) John A. Fortin (NSBN 15221) Tara U. Teegarden (NSBN 15344) McDONALD CARANO LLP 2300 West Sahara Avenue, Suite 1200 Las Vegas, Nevada 89102 Telephone: (702) 873-4100 rkay@mcdonaldcarano.com jfortin@mcdonaldcarano.com tteegarden@mcdonaldcarano.com Attorneys for Defendant TMIF II Portola, LLC 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 11 12 13 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. PEGGY THORNTON, Relator, Case No.: 2:21-cv-01123-APG-BNW and STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR TMIF II PORTOLA, LLC TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM FOR RELIEF [ECF 38] PEGGY THORNTON, Plaintiffs, 14 15 vs. 16 PORTOLA DEL SOL OPERATOR, LLC, 14 a foreign limited-liability company; TMIF II PORTOLA, LLC, a foreign limited15 liability company; APARTMENT MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS, LLC, 16 a foreign limited liability company, and RENE RICHARDSON, as AGENT of 17 PORTOLA DEL SOL OPERATOR, LLC., 17 18 19 20 [First Request] Defendants. 21 22 Under Local Rules IA 6-1 and 7-1, Defendant TMIF II Portola, LLC (“TMIF”) and Plaintiff 23 Peggy Thornton (“Thornton”), by and through their attorneys, hereby agree, stipulate, and 24 respectfully request that the Court extend the deadline for TMIF to file the Reply in Support of its 25 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim for Relief (“Reply”) from April 13, 2023, up to and 26 including April 27, 2023. 27 /// 28 /// Case 2:21-cv-01123-APG-BNW Document 46 Filed 04/11/23 Page 2 of 3 1 In support of this Stipulation, the parties state as follows: 2 1. On June 14, 2021, Thornton filed this action under seal in the United States District 3 Court for the District of Nevada, asserting a single claim for alleged violations of the False Claims 4 Act. (ECF No. 1). 5 2. 6 Thornton’s Complaint from March 10, 2023 to March 24, 2023. (ECF No. 30). 3. 7 8 4. 5. In her Opposition, Thornton attached new documents in support of her Opposition. (ECF No. 42). 6. 13 14 On April 6, 2023, Thornton filed her Opposition to TMIF’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim for Relief (“Opposition”). (ECF No. 42). 11 12 On March 23, 2023, TMIF filed its Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim for Relief. (ECF No. 38). 9 10 The parties thereafter agreed to extend the deadline for TMIF to respond to TMIF’s counsel needs additional time to review and discuss Thornton’s new documents with TMIF and prepare an appropriate response to Thornton’s Opposition. 7. 15 This is TMIF’s first request to this Court for an extension of time to respond to 16 Thornton’s Opposition, the request is in good faith and not for the purposes of delay, and the 17 requested extension will not prejudice any party. 18 /// 19 20 /// 21 22 /// 23 24 /// 25 26 /// 27 28 /// Page 2 of 3 Case 2:21-cv-01123-APG-BNW Document 46 Filed 04/11/23 Page 3 of 3 1 8. The parties stipulate and request that the Court extend the deadline for TMIF to file 2 its Reply from April 13, 2023, up to and including April 27, 2023. 3 DATED this 10th day of April, 2023. 4 NEVADA LEGAL SERVICES, INC. McDONALD CARANO LLP By: /s/ Elizabeth S. Carmona Elizabeth S. Carmona (NSBN 14687) 530 S. 6th St. Las Vegas, Nevada 89101  By: /s/ Rory T. Kay 5 6 7 8 9 10 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Rory T. Kay (NSBN 12416) John A. Fortin (NSBN 15221) Tara U. Teegarden (NSBN 15344) 2300 West Sahara Avenue, Suite 1200 Las Vegas, Nevada 89102 Attorneys for Defendant TMIF II Portola, LLC 11 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 15 16 17 ____________________ ____________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE April 11, 2023 DATED: ________________________ 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 3 of 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?