Devlin v. Hutchings et al
Filing
49
ORDER granting 48 Motion to Extend Time to Respond to 47 Answer to Amended Habeas Petition. Responses due by 10/21/2024. Signed by District Judge Anne R. Traum on 8/30/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MAM)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
4
PIERRE DEVLIN,
Case No. 2:21-cv-01266-ART-DJA
Petitioner,
5
v.
6
7
ORDER
RONALD OLIVER, et al.,
Respondents.
8
9
10
In this habeas corpus action, the respondents filed their answer to the
11
second amended habeas petition on June 21, 2024. (ECF No. 47.) The petitioner,
12
Pierre Devlin, represented by appointed counsel, was then to file a reply by
13
August 20, 2024. (See ECF No. 13 (60 days for reply to answer).)
14
On August 19, 2024, Devlin filed a motion for extension of time (ECF No.
15
48), requesting a 62-day extension, to October 21, 2024. Devlin’s counsel states
16
that the extension of time is necessary because of their obligations in other cases.
17
Devlin’s counsel represents that Respondents do not oppose the motion for
18
extension of time.
19
The Court finds that Devlin’s motion for extension of time is made in good
20
faith and not solely for the purpose of delay, and that there is good cause for the
21
extension of time requested.
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
It is therefore ordered that Petitioner’s Motion for Extension of Time (ECF
2
No. 48) is granted. Petitioner will have until and including October 21, 2024, to
3
file a reply to Respondents’ answer. In all other respects, the schedule for further
4
proceedings set forth in the order entered October 20, 2021 (ECF No. 13) will
5
remain in effect.
6
DATED THIS 30th day of August, 2024.
7
8
9
ANNE R. TRAUM
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?