Humphries et al v. Button

Filing 491

ORDER Granting 490 Motion Request for One Week Extension Reply to 487 Response to 481 Motion. Replies due by 3/17/2025. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 3/11/2025. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ALZ)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Mitchell Taylor Button
(Pro se)
101 Ocean Sands Ct.
Myrtle Beach, SC 29579
(310)-499-8702
[e-mail]
Dusty Button
(Pro se)
101 Ocean Sands Ct.
Myrtle Beach, SC 29579
(310)-499-8930
[e-mail]

9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

12
13
14
15

SAGE HUMPHRIES, GINA MENICHINO,
ROSEMARIE DEANGELO, DANIELLE
GUTIERREZ, JANE DOE 1 AND JANE
DOE 2

16
17

PLAINTIFFS,
V.

18
19

CASE: 2:21-CV-01412-ART-EJY

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION AND
REQUEST FOR A ONE WEEK
EXTENSION TO REPLY TO ECF NO.
487

MITCHELL TAYLOR BUTTON AND
DUSTY BUTTON

20
21

DEFENDANTS

22
23
24

Defendants submit their Motion and request for a one-week extension to file

25

their Reply to ECF No. 487 as they have been locked out of their PACER account, unable to

26

access Court filings due to a glitch in the PACER system, stating their account locked for

27

“non-payment” and that it is mistakenly not exempt from PACER fees.

28
1
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION AND REQUEST FOR A ONE WEEK EXTENSION TO REPLY
TO ECF NO. 487

1

Defendants’ Reply to ECF No. 487, is due today March 10th, 2025 however,

2

Defendants have been unable to access their PACER account to read or obtain the response

3
4
5
6

filed by the Plaintiffs, (ECF No. 487), in order to appropriately Reply. The Defendants have
contacted PACER by email and by telephone and have been told that it appears there is a
glitch in the system which has changed Defendants’ exempt fee status in Nevada “non-

7

exempt”. It now states that the Nevada District Court is not allowing the Defendants access to

8

their PACER account due to “non-payment” but the representatives at PACER can see that is

9

not the case and that Defendants PACER account in Nevada has been exempt from PACER

10
11

fees since 2022 but still, Defendants cannot access their account until PACER fixes the issue.
Defendants do not believe this process will take more than a day or two, as it

12
13
14

has happened before but because they cannot access the Response filed by the Plaintiffs, (ECF
No. 487), they cannot Reply accordingly and do not have a copy of the filing. Defendants

15

emailed the Plaintiffs to confer about their request for an extension but they have not yet

16

heard back; as this is time sensitive, Defendants respectfully request a one-week extension to

17

Reply to Plaintiffs’ Motion at ECF No. 487, making Defendants’ Reply due March 17th, 2025.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION AND REQUEST FOR A ONE WEEK EXTENSION TO REPLY
TO ECF NO. 487

1
2
3
4
5

CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, Defendants respectfully ask that they be granted a
one-week extension to Reply to ECF No. 487.
Respectfully dated this 10th day of March, 2025,

6
7

_______________________________________

8

Mitchell Taylor Button and Dusty Button (Pro se)

9
10
11

IT IS SO ORDERED.

12
13
14
15

____________________________________
U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Date: March 11, 2025

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION AND REQUEST FOR A ONE WEEK EXTENSION TO REPLY
TO ECF NO. 487