Gomez v. 7-11

Filing 7

ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 4 ) is DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk is instructed to close the case. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 11/18/2022., Case terminated. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 GONZALO GOMEZ, 5 6 7 vs. 7-11, et al, 8 Defendants. 9 10 Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 2:21-cv-01423-GMN-VCF ORDER OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 4(m) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE On August 13, 2021, Plaintiff Gonzalo Gomez (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint against 11 Defendants 7-11, Head Manager, and Team (“Defendants”). (See Compl., ECF No. 4). On 12 September 27, 2022, the Court warned Plaintiff that if he did not properly serve Defendants by 13 October 27, 2022, the Court would enter an Order of Dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of 14 Civil Procedure 4(m). (See Notice, ECF No. 6). The deadline to do so has now passed, no 15 proper proof of service has been filed, and Plaintiff has failed to show good cause as to why the 16 Court should not dismiss this action without prejudice for failure to effect timely service. 17 Accordingly, 18 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 4) is DISMISSED 19 without prejudice. 20 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk is instructed to close the case. 21 18 DATED this _____ day of November, 2022. 22 23 24 25 ___________________________________ Gloria M. Navarro, District Judge United States District Court Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?