Martell v. Kahbro et al

Filing 22

ORDER denying 20 Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order; ORDER denying 21 Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 9/19/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)

Download PDF
Case 2:21-cv-01733-JAD-DJA Document 22 Filed 09/19/22 Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 *** 6 LeAndre Martell, 7 Plaintiff, 8 9 Case No. 2:21-cv-01733-JAD-DJA v. SCHEDULING ORDER Derrick Chandler, 10 Defendant. 11 Under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Fed. R. Civ. P.) 16(b) and Local Rule (LR) 16- 12 13 1(b), this Scheduling Order must be filed and served by the Clerk of Court on the parties or their 14 counsel, if there is counsel of record. Plaintiff and Defendant both filed proposed discovery 15 plans. (ECF Nos. 20 and 21). However, because this is a case filed by an inmate arising under 42 16 17 18 19 U.S.C. § 1983, the Court enters a scheduling order under LR 16-1(b). The Court thus denies both parties’ proposed discovery plans and enters the instant Scheduling Order. When the term “counsel” is used in this Scheduling Order, it includes any and all parties appearing pro se. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 20 1. 21 Any and all pleadings that may be brought under Fed. R. Civ. P. 13 and 14, or 22 joining additional parties under Fed. R. Civ. P. 19 and 20, must be filed within 60 days from the 23 date of this Order, which is November 18, 2022. Any party causing additional parties to be joined 24 25 26 27 28 or brought into this action must contemporaneously serve a copy of this Order on the new party or parties. 2. Amendments to pleadings as provided for under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15, if they are allowed without leave of Court, or motions for leave to amend, must comply with LR 15-1 and Case 2:21-cv-01733-JAD-DJA Document 22 Filed 09/19/22 Page 2 of 5 1 2 3 must be filed and served within 60 days from the date of this Order, which is November 18, 2022. 3. 4 5 (a) 8 9 Under LR 16-1(b), discovery in this action must be completed within 90 days from the date of this Order, which is December 19, 2022. 6 7 DISCOVERY: (b) Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 33 (a)(1), unless otherwise stipulated by the parties or ordered by the Court, a party may serve on any other party no more than 25 written interrogatories, including discreet subparts. (c) 10 Under LR 26-7, unless otherwise ordered by the Court, written discovery, 11 including responses to written discovery, certificates of service pertaining to written discovery, 12 and deposition transcripts must not be filed with the Court unless they are submitted in support of 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 or in response to a motion. Originals of responses to written discovery requests must be served on the party who served the discovery request and that party must make the originals available at the pretrial hearing, at trial, or when ordered by the Court. Likewise, the deposing party must make the original transcript of a deposition available at any pretrial hearing, at trial, or when ordered by the Court. 4. EXTENSIONS OF DISCOVERY: Under LR 26-3, an extension of the discovery deadline will not be allowed without a showing of good cause. All motions or stipulations to extend discovery must be received by the Court at least 21 days before the expiration of the subject deadline. The motion or stipulation must include: (a) A statement specifying the discovery completed by the parties as of the 25 date of the motion or stipulation; 26 (b) A specific description of the discovery that remains to be completed; 27 28 Page 2 of 5 Case 2:21-cv-01733-JAD-DJA Document 22 Filed 09/19/22 Page 3 of 5 (c) 1 2 time limit of the existing discovery deadline; and (d) 3 4 5. 5 6 7 A proposed schedule for the completion of all remaining discovery. DISCOVERY MOTIONS: (a) Discovery motions must be filed and served no later than 104 days from the date of this Order, which is January 2, 2023. (b) 8 9 The reasons why such remaining discovery was not completed within the Before filing a discovery motion, the parties must first undertake a good faith effort to resolve any dispute among the parties. The parties are further advised that: (1) Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(1) mandates that any discovery motion “must 10 11 include a certification that the movant has in good faith conferred or attempted to confer with the 12 person or party failing to make disclosure or discovery in an effort to obtain it without court 13 order”; and that, 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 (2) Local Rule 26-6(c) states that a discovery motion “will not be considered unless a statement of the movant is attached certifying that, after personal consultation and sincere effort to do so, the parties have been unable to resolve the matter without court action.” These two rules apply to any inmate civil right action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. While the Court recognizes an inmate might not be able to meet personally with opposing counsel, nevertheless an inmate will still be required to attempt to resolve any discovery dispute either by a telephone consultation or a written communication whereby the inmate sincerely attempted to resolve the discovery dispute. (c) Text of Discovery Materials in Dispute Local Rule 26-6(b) requires that all motions to compel discovery or for protective order must set forth in full the text of the discovery originally sought and the responses thereto, if any. 28 Page 3 of 5 Case 2:21-cv-01733-JAD-DJA Document 22 Filed 09/19/22 Page 4 of 5 1 2 The Court prefers that the actual discovery response which is the subject of a discovery dispute be submitted to the Court. 6. 3 Motions for summary judgment must comply with the requirements of LR 56-1 4 and must be filed and served no later than 30 days after the close of discovery, which is 5 January 18, 2023. 6 7 8 7. No motion filed beyond the time limit fixed by this Scheduling Order will be considered by the Court unless the Court grants an exception for good cause shown. 8. 9 If the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide for any shorter time periods for the 10 filing of motions or pleadings, the shorter time limits will apply notwithstanding the time limits 11 set in this Scheduling Order. Under the authority given to the Court in Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b), 12 motions for summary judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 must be filed no later than the time 13 provided in paragraph 6 of this Order. 14 15 16 17 18 9. Order 30 days after the date for filing motions for summary judgment. If dispositive motions are filed, the date for filing the joint pretrial order will be suspended until 30 days after a decision on the dispositive motions or until further order of the Court. 19 20 21 22 23 24 PRETRIAL: Pursuant to LR 26-1(b)(5), the parties must file a Joint Pretrial 10. Any party who seeks to amend this Scheduling Order must file and serve a motion, not later than 21 days before the deadline for which the party seeks amendment, stating the proposed amendments and the reasons for the amendments. After expiration of the 21-day period, any amendment of this Scheduling Order will be granted only upon a showing of good cause and excusable neglect. 25 26 /// 27 /// 28 Page 4 of 5 Case 2:21-cv-01733-JAD-DJA Document 22 Filed 09/19/22 Page 5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s proposed discovery plan (ECF No. 20) is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s proposed discovery plan (ECF No. 21) is denied. DATED: September 19, 2022 ______________________________________ Daniel J. Albregts United States Magistrate Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 5 of 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?