Leal v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
Filing
62
ORDER Granting 59 Stipulation to Modify/Amend Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 9/20/2023. Motions due by 10/20/2023. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 11/22/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 5/19/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AMMi)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Rene L. Valladares
Federal Public Defender
Nevada State Bar No. 11479
*Martin L. Novillo
Assistant Federal Public Defender
Virginia Bar No. 76997
411 E. Bonneville Ave., Ste. 250
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
(702) 388-6577
Martin_Novillo@fd.org
*Attorney for Petitioner Jack Leal
9
10
U NITED S TATES D ISTRICT C OURT
D ISTRICT OF N EVADA
11
12
Jack Leal,
13
14
15
16
Plaintiff,
v.
Nevada Department of Corrections, et al.,
Case No. 2:21-cv-01965-GMN-VCF
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED
ORDER] TO MODIFY/AMEND
SCHEDULING ORDER
Defendants.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Pursuant to FRCP 16(b)(4), LR 26-3, the parties stipulate and agree to
modify/extend the Scheduling Order (ECF No. 52) and respectfully request that the
Court approve their proposed schedule set forth herein to extend all deadlines for a
period of thirty (30) days. This is the first stipulation for the extension of these
deadlines.1 This request is submitted at least twenty-one (21) days or more before
25
26
27
Counsel for Plaintiff sought two prior extensions in the past, which were
unopposed. See ECF Nos. 48, 51.
1
1
the close of discovery (August 21, 2023), is made in good faith, and is supported by
2
good cause.
3
STATEMENT OF FACTS IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION
4
Mr. Leal initiated the current matter by filing a Complaint on or about
5
October 25, 2021. ECF No. 1. This Court appointed counsel for Mr. Leal on January
6
30, 2023. ECF No. 45. Undersigned counsel, Martin L. Novillo, entered his
7
appearance on February 16, 2023. ECF No. 47.
8
On November 18, 2022, Defendants answered the Amended Complaint. ECF
9
No. 40. On November 21, 2022, the Court entered a Scheduling Order, which set
10
February 16, 2023, as the deadline for filing an Amended Complaint, and May 22,
11
2023, as the deadline for completing discovery. ECF No. 41. Mr. Leal filed a new
12
motion for appointment of counsel, which this Court granted on January 30, 2023.
13
ECF Nos. 44, 45. Undersigned counsel entered his appearance on February 16, 2023.
14
ECF No. 47. On that same date, counsel filed an Unopposed Motion for Revised
15
Scheduling Order, which sought to extend all deadlines in the above-referenced
16
Scheduling Order by sixty (60) days. ECF No. 48. This Court granted counsel’s
17
motion on February 17, 2023. ECF No. 49. On April 17, 2023, counsel filed a Second
18
Unopposed Motion for Revised Scheduling Order, which sought to extend all
19
deadlines in the above-referenced Scheduling Order by thirty (30) days. ECF No. 51.
20
This Court granted counsel’s motion on April 24, 2023. ECF No. 52.
21
On May 17, 2023, undersigned counsel Anna I. Heshmati, filed a Notice of
22
Change of Deputy Attorney General notifying the Court that she was substituting
23
Deputy Attorney General Taylor M. L. Rivich and assuming responsibility for
24
representing the interests of the Defendants. ECF No. 58.
25
Counsel have agreed to stipulate to an extension of thirty (30) days to all
26
deadlines in the revised scheduling order so as to allow counsel for Defendants to
27
familiarize herself with the case. The extension is also being requested so as to
2
1
permit the Federal Public Defender to finalize formulating inter-office procedures
2
for handling 1983 cases and setting up logistical support in the office.2
3
4
Therefore, the parties stipulate to extend the deadlines in the scheduling
order as follows:
5
6
Discovery: that discovery in this action be completed on or before
September 20, 2023;
7
Pleadings that may be brought under Fed. R. Civ. P. 13 & 14, or joining
8
additional parties under Fed. R. Civ. P. 19 & 20: that they be filed and
9
served not later than June 16, 2023;
10
11
Amendments to pleadings as provided for under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15: that
they be filed and served no later than June 16, 2023;
12
Expert disclosures: that they be made on or before July 18, 2023, and
13
that disclosures of rebuttal experts be made on or before August 17,
14
2023;
15
16
Dispositive Motions: that they be filed and served no later than October
20, 2023;
17
18
Joint Pretrial Order: that it be due on November 22, 2023.
If dispositive motions are filed,
the deadline for filing the joint
pretrial order will be suspended
until 30 days after
decision on the dispositive
motions or further court order.
CONCLUSION
19
Based on the foregoing and for good cause appearing, the Parties respectfully
20
request that the Court approve their Stipulation and request for a thirty (30) day
21
extension of the discovery and other deadlines.
22
23
24
25
26
27
As noted in Plaintiff’s last motion for revised scheduling order, Mr. Leal’s
case comprised the first case assignment involving a 1983 action received by an
attorney to the non-capital habeas unit at the Federal Public Defender. More
appointments have since followed. In response to those appointments, the unit has
set out to formulate inter-office procedures for handling 1983 cases. The unit has
likewise set out to secure and allocate the necessary resources and staff support.
Finally, the unit is in the process of conducting various training programs to enable
undersigned and other counsel to handle 1983 actions in an effective manner.
2
3
1
Dated May 17, 2023.
2
3
4
5
6
7
Aaron D. Ford
Attorney General
Rene L. Valladares
Federal Public Defender
/s/ Anna I. Heshmati
Anna I. Heshmati
Deputy Attorney General
/s/ Martin L. Novillo
Martin L. Novillo
Assistant Federal Public Defender
Attorney for Defendants
Attorney for Plaintiff
8
9
10
IT ISISSOSO
ORDERED.
IT
ORDERED:
11
______________________________
Cam Ferenbach
___________________________
United States Magistrate Judge
12
13
United States
District Judge
5-19-2023
14
DATED ________________________
Dated: ____________________
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?