Peter et al v. Wojcicki et al
Filing
6
ORDER Accepting 5 Report and Recommendation. The Plaintiffs Complaint is DISMISSED without Prejudice. The Clerk of Court is instructed to CLOSE THIS CASE. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 1/11/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KF)
Case 2:21-cv-02026-APG-EJY Document 6 Filed 01/11/22 Page 1 of 1
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3 MARIA PETER,
4
Plaintiff
5 v.
6 SUSAN DIANE WOJCICKI, et al.,
7
8
Case No.: 2:21-cv-02026-APG-EJY
Order Accepting Report and
Recommendation and Dismissing Case
Without Prejudice
[ECF No. 5]
Defendants
On December 21, 2021, Magistrate Judge Youchah recommended that I dismiss this case
9 for lack of personal jurisdiction. ECF No. 5. Plaintiff Maria Peter did not object. Thus, I am not
10 obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)
11 (requiring district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or
12 specified proposed findings to which objection is made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328
13 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s
14 findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in
15 original)).
16
I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Youchah’s report and recommendation
17 (ECF No. 5) is accepted and plaintiff Maria Peter’s complaint (ECF No. 4-1) is dismissed
18 without prejudice for lack of personal jurisdiction. The clerk of court is instructed to close this
19 case.
20
DATED this 11th day of January, 2022.
21
22
23
ANDREW P. GORDON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?