PlayUp, Inc. v. Mintas

Filing 544

ORDER Granting 542 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 536 Motion for Summary Judgment, 539 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Responses due by 8/13/2024. Replies due by 9/13/2024. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 7/8/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - RJDG)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ZUMPANO PATRICIOS & POPOK, PLLC Michael S. Popok New York Bar No. 2475226 (Admitted pro hac vice) 134 East 38th Street New York, New York 10016 212-542-2564 and ZUMPANO PATRICIOS POPOK & HELSTEN, PLLC Amanda J. Brookhyser Nevada Bar No. 11526 1210 South Valley View Blvd., Suite 215 Las Vegas, Nevada 89102 702-583-3326 Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, PlayUp, Inc., and Counter-Defendant Daniel Simic 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA 14 PlayUp, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, 15 Plaintiff, 16 v. 17 Dr. Laila Mintas, an individual, 18 Defendant. _____________________________________ 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case No. 2:21-cv-02129-GMN-NJK STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND EXPANSION OF PAGE LIMIT FOR REPLY [FIRST REQUEST] Dr. Laila Mintas, an individual, Counter-Claimant, v. PlayUp, Inc., a Delaware Corporation; PlayUp Ltd., an Australian company; Daniel Simic, an Individual, Counter-Defendants. 26 27 28 1 1 Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant PlayUp, Inc. (“PlayUp”), Counter-Defendant Daniel Simic 2 (“Mr. Simic”), and Defendant/Counter-Claimant Dr. Laila Mintas (“Mintas”), by and through their 3 respective counsel of record, hereby submit this stipulation to extend the time for PlayUp and Mr. 4 Simic to file their respective Opposition’s to the Motions for Summary Judgment pursuant to LR 5 IA 6-1 from July 17 to August 13, 2024. The parties further stipulate that Mintas, PlayUp and Mr. 6 Simic’s replies in support of Dkt. No. 534 and Dkt. No. 549 will be due on September 13, 2024. 7 The parties further stipulate to the replies in support of Dkt. No. 534 and Dkt. No. 549 shall be 8 expanded from fourteen (14) to twenty (20) pages. 9 Good cause exists to grant this stipulation based on several factors. First, lead trial counsel 10 for PlayUp and Mr. Simic is on parental leave until the end of July, therefore in order for him to 11 meaningfully participate in the briefing of the Opposition to Mintas’ Motion for Summary 12 Judgment, more time is necessary. Additionally, Dr. Mintas’ will be unavailable for the entirety of 13 August and cannot meaningfully assist her attorneys in their Reply to PlayUp and Mr. Simic’s 14 Motion for Summary Judgment. Finally, good cause exists to grant this stipulation in relation to 15 the expansion of page limits because of this request has also been agreed to by the parties and is 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?