FaceTec, Inc. v. iProov Ltd.

Filing 119

ORDER Granting 118 Stipulation to Extend Briefing Schedule re 117 Motion to Compel. Responses due by 9/6/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 8/28/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ALZ)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

F. Christopher Austin, Esq. (NV Bar No. 6559)
[e-mail]
WEIDE & MILLER, LTD.
10655 Park Run Drive, Suite 100
Las Vegas, NV 89144
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Nathaniel L. Dilger (CA Bar No. 196203)
[e-mail]
Peter R. Afrasiabi (CA Bar No. 193336)
[e-mail]
William J. O’Brien (CA Bar No. 99526)
[e-mail]
ONE LLP
23 Corporate Plaza
Suite 150-105
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

11
12

Attorneys for Plaintiff and
Counter-Defendant FaceTec, Inc.

13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

15

FACETEC, INC., a Delaware corporation,
Plaintiff,

16
17
18
19
20

23

JOINT STIPULATION AND
PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND
BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL

v.
iPROOV LTD, a United Kingdom limited
liability company,
Defendant.

(First Request)

iPROOV LTD, a United Kingdom limited
liability company,

21
22

Case No. 2:21-cv-02252-ART-BNW

Counter-Claimant,
v.
FACETEC, INC., a Delaware corporation,
Counter-Defendant.

24
25

Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, 6-2, and LR 7-1, Plaintiff Facetec, Inc. (“Facetec”) and Defendant

26

iProov Ltd. (“iProov”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate to and

27

request that Plaintiff’s time to respond to Defendant’s Motion to Compel (ECF No. 117), filed on

28

August 16, 2024, be extended by seven days, to September 6, 2024. This is the parties’ first

WEIDE & MILLER, LTD.
10655 PARK RUN DRIVE
SUITE 100
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89144
[phone]

1

1

request for a continuance of the briefing schedule and hearing on this motion to compel.

2

Good cause exists for this extension, because counsel for Plaintiff Facetec, Inc., Nathaniel

3

Dilger, will be traveling and out of the office the week of August 26, 2024 and the Labor Day

4

weekend, including September 3, 2024. Good cause further exists because the parties believe the

5

additional time may be helpful are continuing to confer regarding narrowing the issues in dispute.

6

For the reasons above, the parties hereby stipulate that Plaintiff’s time to respond to

7
8
9

Defendant’s Motion to Compel be extended by seven days to September 6, 2024.
Dated: August 27, 2024
WEIDE & MILLER, LTD.

EVAN FEARS SCHUTTERT
MCNULTY MICKUS

/s/ F. Christopher Austin
F. Christopher Austin, Esq. (SBN 6559)
10655 Park Run Drive, Suite 100
Las Vegas, NV 89144
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

/s/ Jay Schuttert
Jay J. Schuttert, Esq. (SBN 8656)
David W. Gutke, Esq. (SBN 9820
6720 Via Austi Parkway, Suite 300
Las Vegas, NV 89119
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

Nathaniel L. Dilger (CA Bar No. 196203)
Email: [e-mail]
Peter R. Afrasiabi (CA Bar No. 193336)
Email: [e-mail]
William J. O’Brien (CA Bar No. 99526)
Email: [e-mail]
ONE LLP
23 Corporate Plaza, Suite 150-105
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff

/s/ Ryan E. Hatch
Ryan E. Hatch
Email: [e-mail]
Hatch Law, PC
13323 Washington Blvd., Suite 302
Los Angeles, CA 90066
Work: 310-279-5076
Mobile: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant

23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED

25
26
United States Magistrate Judge
27
28

Dated:

August 28, 2024

WEIDE & MILLER, LTD.
10655 PARK RUN DRIVE
SUITE 100
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89144
[phone]

2