Otterson vs UberEats, Inc et al

Filing 20

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's motions (ECF Nos. 17 , 18 , and 19 ) are denied without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 5/10/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)

Case 2:22-cv-00054-JAD-DJA Document 20 Filed 05/10/22 Page 1 of 1

1
2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

4
5
6
7
8
9
10

***
James Paul Otterson,

Case No. 2:22-cv-00054-JAD-DJA
Plaintiff,

Order

v.
Uber Eats, Inc., et al.,
Defendants.

11
12

Before the Court are Plaintiff James Paul Otterson’s motion to respond (ECF No. 17),

13

motion to identify attorneys (ECF No. 18), and motion to identify counsel (ECF No. 19). Other

14

than their titles, these three motions are identical. The requested relief, however, does not match

15

up with the titles. In each motion, Plaintiff asks the Court to “move the trial, as well as the trial-

16

related deadlines and non-trial related deadlines” to June 1, 2022. The Court interprets Plaintiff

17

as referring to those deadlines which would typically be set by a discovery plan and scheduling

18

order under Local Rule 26-1. However, there is no discovery plan and scheduling order in this

19

case. No defendants or other parties have appeared in this case. And Plaintiff does not assert to

20

have initiated the scheduling of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) conference which

21

would trigger case-related deadlines under Local Rule 26-1.

22
23
24

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motions (ECF Nos. 17, 18, and 19) are
denied without prejudice.

25
26
27
28

DATED: May 10, 2022
DANIEL J. ALBREGTS
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE