Otterson vs UberEats, Inc et al
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's motions (ECF Nos. 17 , 18 , and 19 ) are denied without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 5/10/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)
Case 2:22-cv-00054-JAD-DJA Document 20 Filed 05/10/22 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
James Paul Otterson,
Case No. 2:22-cv-00054-JAD-DJA
Uber Eats, Inc., et al.,
Before the Court are Plaintiff James Paul Otterson’s motion to respond (ECF No. 17),
motion to identify attorneys (ECF No. 18), and motion to identify counsel (ECF No. 19). Other
than their titles, these three motions are identical. The requested relief, however, does not match
up with the titles. In each motion, Plaintiff asks the Court to “move the trial, as well as the trial-
related deadlines and non-trial related deadlines” to June 1, 2022. The Court interprets Plaintiff
as referring to those deadlines which would typically be set by a discovery plan and scheduling
order under Local Rule 26-1. However, there is no discovery plan and scheduling order in this
case. No defendants or other parties have appeared in this case. And Plaintiff does not assert to
have initiated the scheduling of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) conference which
would trigger case-related deadlines under Local Rule 26-1.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motions (ECF Nos. 17, 18, and 19) are
denied without prejudice.
DATED: May 10, 2022
DANIEL J. ALBREGTS
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?