Abbott v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 23

ORDER granting 22 Stipulation Re: 8 Motion to Dismiss, Replies due by 8/9/2022. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 8/1/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)

Download PDF
Case 2:22-cv-00423-RFB-BNW Document 23 Filed 08/01/22 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Deverie J. Christensen Nevada State Bar No. 6596 Hilary A. Williams Nevada State Bar No. 14645 JACKSON LEWIS P.C. 300 S. Fourth Street, Suite 900 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Tel: (702) 921-2460 Email: deverie.christensen@jacksonlewis.com Email: hilary.williams@jacksonlewis.com Attorneys for Defendant Apple Inc. 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 BRADY MARK ABBOTT, 11 12 13 Plaintiff, Case No. 2:22-cv-00423-RFB-BNW Defendant. STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE ITS REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO DISMISS vs. APPLE, INC., 14 15 (FIRST REQUEST) 16 17 Plaintiff Brady Mark Abbott (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Apple Inc. (“Defendant”), by and 18 through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree that Defendant shall have an 19 extension of time up to and including August 9, 2022, in which to file a reply in support of its 20 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 8) (filed on June 10, 2022). This Stipulation is 21 submitted and based on the following: 22 1. Plaintiff filed his Complaint (ECF No. 1) on March 7, 2022. 23 2. Defendant filed its Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 8) on June 24 10, 2022. 25 3. Plaintiff filed his Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Complaint and 26 Motion for Leave of Court to File Amended Complaint (ECF No. 21) (the “Opposition”) on July 27 26, 2022. 28 Jackson Lewis P.C. Las Vegas Case 2:22-cv-00423-RFB-BNW Document 23 Filed 08/01/22 Page 2 of 2 1 4. The deadline for Defendant to file a reply in support of its Motion to Dismiss 2 Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 8) is currently August 2, 2022. However, because Plaintiff’s 3 Opposition includes a motion, Defendant requires additional time to address it. Due to this and 4 the obligations of Defendant’s counsel in other matters, the parties have agreed to extend the time 5 for Defendant to file a reply in support of its Motion to Dismiss by seven (7) days, up to and 6 including August 9, 2022. 7 8 9 10 5. This is the first request for an extension of time for Defendant to file its reply in support of its Motion to Dismiss. 6. This request is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay. Dated this 1st day of August, 2022. 11 HOLMAN LAW OFFICE JACKSON LEWIS P.C. 12 14 /s/ Kristina Holman KRISTINA HOLMAN, Bar No. 3742 8275 S. Eastern Ave., Suite 215 Las Vegas, Nevada 89123 /s/ Hilary A. Williams Deverie J. Christensen, Bar No. 6596 Hilary A. Williams, Bar No. 14645 300 S. Fourth Street, Suite 900 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 15 Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant 13 16 17 ORDER 18 IT IS SO ORDERED: 19 20 21 22 United States District Judge Dated: ______________________________ August 1, 2022 23 24 4889-9361-7708, v. 1 25 26 27 28 Jackson Lewis P.C. Las Vegas 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?