SFR Investments Pool 1 LLC, v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC, et al

Filing 30

ORDER Granting 29 Stipulation to Extend Deadlines re 20 Motion to Dismiss. Replies due by 8/2/2022. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 8/1/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KF)

1
2
3
4

VANESSA M. TURLEY, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 14635
TROUTMAN PEPPER HAMILTON SANDERS LLP
8985 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. 200
Las Vegas, NV 89123 (Nevada Office)
Tele: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]

5
6
7
8

TROUTMAN PEPPER HAMILTON SANDERS LLP
600 Peachtree St. NE #3000
Atlanta, GA 30308 (Corporate Office)
Attorneys for Defendant Nationstar Mortgage LLC, dba
Mr. Cooper and Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corporation

9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

12
13

SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC,

14
15
16
17

Plaintiff,
v.
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC d/b/a
MR. COOPER; FEDERAL HOME LOAN
MORTGAGE CORPORATION; DOES I
through X; and ROE BUSINESS ENTITIES
I through X, inclusive,

Case No. 2:22-cv-00531-APG-VCF
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND
RESPONSE DEADLINE
(SECOND REQUEST)

18
Defendants.
19
20

Plaintiff, SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC (“SFR”) and Defendants, Nationstar Mortgage,

21

LLC d/b/a Mr. Cooper (“Nationstar”) and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (‘Freddie

22

Mac”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate

23
24
25

and agree to extend the date for Nationstar and Freddie Mac to file a Reply in Support of their
Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 20]. The parties further stipulate and agree that the foreclosure sale

26

on the subject property be postponed until this Court rules on SFR’s Motion. The parties finally

27

stipulate and agree that the foreclosure sale on the subject property be postponed until this Court

28
128422419

1
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND RESPONSE DEADLINE (SECOND REQUEST)

1

rules on SFR’s Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction

2

(“Motion”) [ECF No. 5, 6].

3

In support of the stipulation, the Parties state as follows:

4
1.

On March 28, 2022, SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC (“SFR”) filed the Complaint in

5
the instant matter. [ECF No 1].

6
7

2.

Order and Preliminary Injunction (“Motion”). [ECF No. 5, 6].

8
9

On March 29, 2022, SFR filed an Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining

3.

10

On March 30, 2022, this Court entered a minute order in chambers setting a deadline
for Defendants to respond to the Motion no later than Monday, April 4, 2022 at

11

12:00 p.m. and further ordering a hearing on the Motion for Tuesday, April 5, 2022,

12
at 10:00 a.m. [ECF No. 7]. Defendants were served with the Order and all other

13

documents related to the matter on the same day.

14
15

4.

On April 4, 2022, this Court entered an order extending the deadline for Nationstar

16

to respond to the motion for preliminary injunction to April 13, 2022, setting the

17

deadline for SFR to file a reply in support of its motion for seven days later, and

18

setting the hearing on the motion for preliminary injunction on April 28, 2022 at

19
10:30 AM. [ECF No. 11].
20
21

5.

On April 29th, 2022, the Parties agreed and stipulated that Defendants would have

22

until May 4, 2022, to file a response to the Motion for Preliminary Injunction. The

23

Order further allowed the Motion to be briefed in the normal course pursuant to LR

24

7-2. [ECF No. 13].

25

6.

26

On May 25, 2022, the Parties, again, agreed and stipulated the Defendants would
have until June 1, 2022, to file a response to the Motion for Preliminary Injunction,

27
allowing counsel adequate time to evaluate the case and respond to the Motion and
28
128422419

2
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND RESPONSE DEADLINE (SECOND REQUEST)

1

to further allow the Motion to be briefed in the normal cause pursuant to LR7-2.

2

[ECF No. 17].

3

7.

On June 6, 2022, the Parties agreed and stipulated that Defendants would have until

4
June 24, 2022, to file a response to the Motion for Preliminary Injunction and a
5
responsive pleading to the Complaint. Pursuant to LR 7-2, SFR would have seven

6
7

days after service of Defendants’ Response to the Motion for Preliminary Injunction

8

to file a reply in support of its Motion. [ECF No. 19].

9

8.

Defendants filed their Opposition to the Motion for Preliminary Injunction and

10

Motion to Dismiss on June 24, 2022. [ECF No.’s 20, 21].

11

9.

SFR filed its reply in support of the Motion for Preliminary Injunction on June 30,

12
2022 [ECF No. 22].

13
10.

14

SFR filed its Response to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss on July 19, 2022. [ECF
No. 26].

15
16

11.

17

On July 27, 2022, the Court entered an Order granting the parties’ Stipulation and
Order to Extend Response Deadline where Defendants’ Reply was due on July 29,

18

2022. [ECF No. 28].

19
12.

At the present time, the hearing originally set for April 28, 2022, at 10:30 a.m., has

20
been vacated and has yet to be reset.

21
13.

22

Finally, the parties agree that Defendants shall have until August 2, 2022, to file a
Reply to their Motion to Dismiss.

23
24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
128422419

3
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND RESPONSE DEADLINE (SECOND REQUEST)

1

14.

2

Both parties represent this stipulation is not made with any intent to delay or
prejudice either party.

3
4
5
6
7
8
9

DATED this 29th day of July, 2022.

DATED this 29th day of July, 2022.

Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP

Hanks Law Group

/s/ Vanessa M. Turley
Vanessa M. Turley, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 14635
8985 S. Eastern Avenue, Suite 200
Las Vegas, NV 89123
Counsel for Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
dba Mr. Cooper and Federal Home Loan
Mortgage Corporation

/s/
Chantel Schimming
Chantel M. Schimming, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 8886
7625 Dean Martin Drive, Suite 110
Las Vegas, NV 89139
Counsel for SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC

10
11
12

IT IS SO ORDERED.

13
14

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
DATED: August 1, 2022

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
128422419

4
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND RESPONSE DEADLINE (SECOND REQUEST)