Udesky v. Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc.

Filing 9

ORDER Granting #8 Stipulation for Extension of Time (First Request) to File Response re #1 Complaint. Carmax Auto Superstores, Inc. answer due 5/20/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 5/5/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - YAW)

Case 2:22-cv-00546-RFB-EJY Document 9 Filed 05/05/22 Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Noel M. Hicks
Nevada Bar No. 13893
[e-mail]
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.
10801 W. Charleston Blvd.
Suite 500
Las Vegas, NV 89135
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc.

200 S. Virginia Street, 8th Floor
Reno, NV 89501
Telephone: [phone]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9
Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.

8

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA

10

MICHAEL UDESKY, an Individual

11
12
13
14
15

Plaintiff,
vs.
CARMAX AUTO SUPERSTORES, INC., a
Virginia Corporation; DOES I through X,
inclusive, and ROE CORPORATIONS I
through X, inclusive,

16

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND
TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE
RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S
COMPLAINT
(First Request)

Defendants.

17
18

Case No.: 2:22-cv-00546-RFB-EJY

Pursuant to Local Rules IA 6-1, IA 6-2, and 7-1, Defendant CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc.
(“Defendant”) and Plaintiff Michael Udesky (“Plaintiff”) hereby request a two-week extension of
time, up to and including, May 20, 2022 for Defendant to file its response to Plaintiff’s Complaint
(ECF No. 1, Ex. A.) The present deadline for Defendant to file its response is May 6, 2022. This is
the parties’ first request for an extension of time for Defendant to file its response.
This Stipulation is made in good faith and is not intended for purposes of delay. The parties
are exploring whether and to what extent they are agreeable to stipulating to arbitrate this matter. If
not, Defendant would like the additional time to prepare a response to the Complaint and/or file a
Motion to Compel Arbitration.
///
///

Case 2:22-cv-00546-RFB-EJY Document 9 Filed 05/05/22 Page 2 of 2

1

As a result, good cause exists to extend the response deadline. Therefore, the parties

2

respectfully request a two-week extension of time up to and including May 20, 2022 for Defendant

3

to file its response to Plaintiff’s Complaint.

4

5th
DATED this ___ day of May, 2022.

DATED this ____ day of May, 2022.
5th

5

RYAN ALEXANDER, CHTD.

OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART,
P.C.

/s/
Ryan Alexander
Nevada Bar No. 10845
3017 West Charleston Blvd., Ste. 10
Las Vegas, NV 89102
Attorneys for Plaintiff

/s/
Noel M. Hicks
Nevada Bar No. 13893
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART,
P.C.
10801 W. Charleston Blvd.
Suite 500
Las Vegas, NV 89135
Attorneys for Defendant

6
7
8
9

11
12
Wells Fargo Tower
Suite 1500, 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway
Las Vegas, NV 89169
Telephone: [phone]

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.

10

13
14

ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.

15
16

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

17
18

DATED: May 5th, 2022

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
51410850.v1-Ogletree