Wells Fargo Bank N.A. v. Fidelity National Title Group, Inc. et al
Filing
12
ORDER granting 11 Stipulation Re: 1 Petition for Removal. Defendants' respective deadlines to respond to the complaint are hereby extended through and including Monday, June 6, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 5/6/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)
Case 2:22-cv-00616-APG-EJY Document 12 Filed 05/06/22 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
Scott E. Gizer, Esq., Nevada Bar No. 12216
sgizer@earlysullivan.com
Sophia S. Lau, Esq., Nevada Bar No. 13365
slau@earlysullivan.com
EARLY SULLIVAN WRIGHT
GIZER & McRAE LLP
8716 Spanish Ridge Avenue, Suite 105
Las Vegas, Nevada 89148
Telephone: (702) 331-7593
Facsimile: (702) 331-1652
6
7
8
9
Kevin S. Sinclair, NV Bar No. 12277
ksinclair@sinclairbraun.com
SINCLAIR BRAUN LLP
16501 Ventura Blvd, Suite 400
Encino, California 91436
Telephone: (213) 429-6100
Facsimile: (213) 429-6101
10
11
Attorneys for Defendants
FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE GROUP, INC. and FIDELITY
NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
12
13
14
15
DESIGNATED LOCAL COUNSEL FOR SERVICE OF
PROCESS ON SINCLAIR BRAUN LLP PER L.R. IA 11-1(b)
Gary L. Compton, State Bar No. 1652
2950 E. Flamingo Road, Suite L
Las Vegas, Nevada 89121
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
18
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
19
Plaintiff,
20
21
vs.
Case No.: 2:22-CV-00616-APG-EJY
STIPULATION AND ORDER
EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT (ECF No. 1)
FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE GROUP,
INC. et al.,
22
Defendants.
23
24
COMES NOW defendants Fidelity National Title Group, Inc. (“FNTG”) and Fidelity
25
National Title Insurance Company (“Fidelity”) (collectively “Defendants”) and plaintiff Wells
26
Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”), by and through their respective attorneys of record, which
27
hereby agree and stipulate as follows:
28
1
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Case 2:22-cv-00616-APG-EJY Document 12 Filed 05/06/22 Page 2 of 3
1
2
1.
Court for the State of Nevada;
3
4
2.
On April 13, 2022, Chicago Title removed the instant case to the United States
District Court for the State of Nevada (ECF No. 1);
5
6
On April 12, 2022, Wells Fargo filed its complaint in the Eighth Judicial District
3.
Chicago Title’s response to Wells Fargo’s complaint is currently due on May 6,
2022, while FNTG’s response is currently due on May 11, 2022;
7
4.
Counsel for Defendants request a 31-day extension for Chicago Title (26 days for
8
FNTG) through and including Monday, June 6, 2022, for Defendants to file their respective
9
responses to Wells Fargo’s complaint to afford Defendants’ counsel additional time to review and
10
respond to Wells Fargo’s complaint.
11
5.
Counsel for Wells Fargo does not oppose the requested extension;
12
6.
This is the first request for an extension made by counsel for Defendants, which is
13
made in good faith and not for the purposes of delay.
14
7.
This stipulation is entered into without waiving any of Defendants’ objections
15
under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12.
16
//
17
//
18
//
19
//
20
//
21
//
22
//
23
//
24
//
25
//
26
//
27
//
28
//
2
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Case 2:22-cv-00616-APG-EJY Document 12 Filed 05/06/22 Page 3 of 3
1
IT IS SO STIPULATED that Defendants’ respective deadlines to respond to the
2
complaint are hereby extended through and including Monday, June 6, 2022.
3
Dated: May 5, 2022
SINCLAIR BRAUN LLP
4
5
By:
6
7
8
9
Dated: May 5, 2022
/s/-Kevin S. Sinclair
KEVIN S. SINCLAIR
Attorneys for Defendants
FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE GROUP,
INC. and FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE
INSURANCE COMPANY
WRIGHT FINLAY & ZAK, LLP
10
By:
11
12
13
14
/s/-Lindsay D. Dragon
LINDSAY D. DRAGON
Attorneys for Plaintiff
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 6th day of May, 2022.
15
16
17
18
__________________________________________
ELAYNA J. YOUCHAH
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?