Wells Fargo Bank N.A. v. Fidelity National Title Group, Inc. et al

Filing 12

ORDER granting 11 Stipulation Re: 1 Petition for Removal. Defendants' respective deadlines to respond to the complaint are hereby extended through and including Monday, June 6, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 5/6/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)

Download PDF
Case 2:22-cv-00616-APG-EJY Document 12 Filed 05/06/22 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 Scott E. Gizer, Esq., Nevada Bar No. 12216 sgizer@earlysullivan.com Sophia S. Lau, Esq., Nevada Bar No. 13365 slau@earlysullivan.com EARLY SULLIVAN WRIGHT GIZER & McRAE LLP 8716 Spanish Ridge Avenue, Suite 105 Las Vegas, Nevada 89148 Telephone: (702) 331-7593 Facsimile: (702) 331-1652 6 7 8 9 Kevin S. Sinclair, NV Bar No. 12277 ksinclair@sinclairbraun.com SINCLAIR BRAUN LLP 16501 Ventura Blvd, Suite 400 Encino, California 91436 Telephone: (213) 429-6100 Facsimile: (213) 429-6101 10 11 Attorneys for Defendants FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE GROUP, INC. and FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 12 13 14 15 DESIGNATED LOCAL COUNSEL FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS ON SINCLAIR BRAUN LLP PER L.R. IA 11-1(b) Gary L. Compton, State Bar No. 1652 2950 E. Flamingo Road, Suite L Las Vegas, Nevada 89121 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 18 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., 19 Plaintiff, 20 21 vs. Case No.: 2:22-CV-00616-APG-EJY STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (ECF No. 1) FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE GROUP, INC. et al., 22 Defendants. 23 24 COMES NOW defendants Fidelity National Title Group, Inc. (“FNTG”) and Fidelity 25 National Title Insurance Company (“Fidelity”) (collectively “Defendants”) and plaintiff Wells 26 Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”), by and through their respective attorneys of record, which 27 hereby agree and stipulate as follows: 28 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Case 2:22-cv-00616-APG-EJY Document 12 Filed 05/06/22 Page 2 of 3 1 2 1. Court for the State of Nevada; 3 4 2. On April 13, 2022, Chicago Title removed the instant case to the United States District Court for the State of Nevada (ECF No. 1); 5 6 On April 12, 2022, Wells Fargo filed its complaint in the Eighth Judicial District 3. Chicago Title’s response to Wells Fargo’s complaint is currently due on May 6, 2022, while FNTG’s response is currently due on May 11, 2022; 7 4. Counsel for Defendants request a 31-day extension for Chicago Title (26 days for 8 FNTG) through and including Monday, June 6, 2022, for Defendants to file their respective 9 responses to Wells Fargo’s complaint to afford Defendants’ counsel additional time to review and 10 respond to Wells Fargo’s complaint. 11 5. Counsel for Wells Fargo does not oppose the requested extension; 12 6. This is the first request for an extension made by counsel for Defendants, which is 13 made in good faith and not for the purposes of delay. 14 7. This stipulation is entered into without waiving any of Defendants’ objections 15 under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12. 16 // 17 // 18 // 19 // 20 // 21 // 22 // 23 // 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 // 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Case 2:22-cv-00616-APG-EJY Document 12 Filed 05/06/22 Page 3 of 3 1 IT IS SO STIPULATED that Defendants’ respective deadlines to respond to the 2 complaint are hereby extended through and including Monday, June 6, 2022. 3 Dated: May 5, 2022 SINCLAIR BRAUN LLP 4 5 By: 6 7 8 9 Dated: May 5, 2022 /s/-Kevin S. Sinclair KEVIN S. SINCLAIR Attorneys for Defendants FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE GROUP, INC. and FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY WRIGHT FINLAY & ZAK, LLP 10 By: 11 12 13 14 /s/-Lindsay D. Dragon LINDSAY D. DRAGON Attorneys for Plaintiff WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 6th day of May, 2022. 15 16 17 18 __________________________________________ ELAYNA J. YOUCHAH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?