Gillo v. Department of Transportation
ORDER Denying without prejudice 12 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint re 1 Complaint, 9 Notice of Corrected Image/Document. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 9/19/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - YAW)
Case 2:22-cv-00857-CDS-NJK Document 14 Filed 09/19/22 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
THE HONORABLE PETE BUTTIGIEG,
Case No. 2:22-cv-00857-CDS-NJK
[Docket No. 12]
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend. Docket No. 12. As a
14 threshold matter, it is not clear that leave of Court is required for Plaintiff to amend given that no
15 defendant has appeared in the case. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1); see also Vanguard Outdoor, LLC
16 v. City of Los Angeles, 648 F.3d 737, 748 (9th Cir. 2011). To the extent leave is required, the
17 motion contains no points and authorities or meaningfully developed argument. But see Local
18 Rule 7-2(d); Kor Media Grp., LLC v. Green, 294 F.R.D. 579, 582 n.3 (D. Nev. 2013).
19 Accordingly, the motion for leave to amend is DENIED without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 19, 2022
Nancy J Koppe
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?