Miller v. Johnson et al

Filing 50

ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that THIS CASE IS STAYED pending the conclusion of the arbitration proceedings. The Clerk of Court is directed to ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 3/10/2025., Case stayed. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - GA)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 Michele Denise Miller, 4 5 v. Plaintiff Case No.: 2:22-cv-01150-JAD-VCF Order Staying Case Pending Arbitration 6 Long Drugs dba CVS Health, et al., 7 Defendants 8 Pro se plaintiff Michele Denise Miller sued CVS Health for retaliation and employment 9 discrimination based on her age and race. In November 2023, I granted CVS’s motion to compel 10 arbitration and dismiss this case. 1 At the time that order was issued, Ninth Circuit authority 11 allowed district courts compelling arbitration to either stay or dismiss the case. But during the 12 pendency of Miller’s appeal of my order, the United States Supreme Court held in Smith v. 13 Spizzirri that district courts compelling arbitration may only stay—not dismiss—such a case. 2 14 So the Ninth Circuit panel vacated my dismissal order and remanded with instructions for me to 15 issue a stay pending arbitration instead. 3 16 As the Ninth Circuit has vacated the dismissal portion of my order and “remand[ed] for a 17 stay pending arbitration,” 4 IT IS ORDERED that THIS CASE IS STAYED pending the 18 19 20 21 1 22 2 ECF No. 37. ECF No. 46 at 2–3 (quoting Smith v. Spizzirri, 601 U.S. 472, 478 (2024)). 23 3 Id. at 3. 4 Id. 1 conclusion of the arbitration proceedings. The Clerk of Court is directed to 2 ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this case. 3 4 _______________________________ U.S. District Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey March 10, 2025 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?