Innovativ Media Group, Inc. et al v. Beys et al

Filing 41

ORDER Granting #40 Stipulation for Extension of time to respond to Complaint. Michael Beys answer due 10/14/2022; Richard De Silva answer due 10/14/2022; Lateral Credit Opportunities, LLC answer due 10/14/2022; Lateral FTE Feeder, LLC answer due 10/14/2022; Lateral Investment Management, LLC answer due 10/14/2022; Lateral Juscom Feeder, LLC answer due 10/14/2022; Lateral U.S. Credit Opportunities Fund QP, L.P. answer due 10/14/2022; Lateral U.S. Opportunities Fund AI, L.P. answer due 10/14/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 9/14/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LOE)

Download PDF
Case 2:22-cv-01184-JCM-EJY Document 41 Filed 09/14/22 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Therese M. Shanks, Esq. (SBN 12890) Wade Beavers, Esq. (SBN 13451) Chelsie Adams, Esq. (SBN 13058) FENNEMORE CRAIG, P.C. 7800 Rancharrah Parkway Reno, Nevada 89511 Tel: 775-788-2228 Fax: 775-788-2229 tshanks@fennemorelaw.com; wbeavers@fennemorelaw.com; cadams@fennemorelaw.com Andrew K. Stutzman, Esq. (PA Bar No. 72922) Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP 2005 Market Street, Ste. 2600 Philadelphia, PA 19103-7018 Tel: 215-564-8728 Fax: 215-564-8210 AStuztman@stradley.com Pro Hac Vice Attorneys for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 12 13 14 15 INNOVATIV MEDIA GROUP, INC., a Wyoming corporation; TTP8, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Plaintiffs, 16 CASE NO.: 2:22-cv-01184-JCM-EJY STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER VERIFIED AMENDED COMPLAINT vs. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 MICHAEL BEYS; RICHARD DE SILVA; (Third Request) LATERAL U.S. OPPORTUNITIES FUND AI, L.P., a Delaware Limited Partnership; LATERAL U.S. CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES FUND QP, L.P., a Delaware Limited Partnership; LATERAL CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; LATERAL INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; LATERAL FTE FEEDER, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; LATERAL JUSCOM FEEDER, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; DOES IX; ROE Entities, I-X, 26 27 28 Defendants. - and – FTE NETWORKS INC., nominal party. Case 2:22-cv-01184-JCM-EJY Document 41 Filed 09/14/22 Page 2 of 2 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER VERIFIED AMENDED COMPLAINT 2 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b) and Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2, Plaintiffs 3 Innovativ Media Group, INC. and TTP8, LLC and Defendants Michael Beys, Richard de Silva, 4 Lateral U.S. Credit Opportunities Fund QP, L.P., Lateral Credit Opportunities, LLC, Lateral 5 Investment Management, LLC, Lateral Fte Feeder, LLC, and Lateral Juscom Feeder, LLC 6 7 (collectively the “Defendants”) stipulate through their undersigned counsel that the Defendants’ deadline to file a response to Plaintiffs’ Verified Amended Complaint be extended to October 14, 8 2022. Plaintiffs consent to the extension. It is further agreed that nothing in this stipulation shall 9 be deemed to waive or prejudice any claims or defenses of any party to this action. 10 DATED this 14th day of September, 2022. 11 FENNEMORE CRAIG, P.C. LEX DOMUS LAW By: /s/ Therese M. Shanks Therese M. Shanks, Esq. (SBN 12890) Wade Beavers, Esq. (SBN 13451) Chelsie Adams, Esq. (SBN 13058) 7800 Rancharrah Parkway Reno, Nevada 89511 By: /s/ Daniel S. Cereghino Daniel S. Cereghino, Esq. (SBN 11534) Brandi M. Planet, Esq. (SBN 11710) Austin M. Maul, Esq. (SBN 15596) 1712 Tesara Vista Place Las Vegas, Nevada 89128 12 13 14 15 16 -AND- Attorneys for Defendants 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Andrew K. Stutzman, Esq. (PA Bar No. 72922) Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP 2005 Market Street, Ste. 2600 Philadelphia, PA 19103-7018 Tel: 215-564-8728 Fax: 215-564-8210 AStuztman@stradley.com Pro Hac Vice Attorneys for Plaintiffs DATED this 14th day of September, 2022. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED 26 27 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28 2 28000427.1/057702.0002

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?