Albright v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
Filing
18
ORDER Granting 17 Motion to Extend Time to Answer 1 Complaint. Citicards Bank, N.A. answer due 12/2/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 11/21/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KF)
Case 2:22-cv-01271-RFB-EJY Document 18 Filed 11/21/22 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
Joel E. Tasca
Nevada Bar No. 14124
Andrew S. Clark
Nevada Bar No. 14854
BALLARD SPAHR LLP
1980 Festival Plaza Drive, Suite 900
Las Vegas, Nevada 89135
Telephone: (702) 471-7000
Facsimile: (702) 471-7070
E-mail: tasca@ballardspahr.com
E-mail: clarkas@ballardspahr.com
7 Attorneys for Defendant Citibank,
N.A.
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
MARY ALBRIGHT,
(702) 471-7000 FAX (702) 471-7070
12
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89135
BALLARD SPAHR LLP
1980 FESTIVAL PLAZA DRIVE, SUITE 900
11
CASE NO. 2:22-cv-01271-RFB-EJY
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
EXPERIAN INFORMATION
SOLUTIONS, INC.; EQUIFAX
INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC;
CITICARDS BANK, N.A.,
15
16
UNOPPOSED MOTION AND
PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND TIME
TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
(First Request)
Defendants.
17
18
19
The response of defendant Citibank, N.A. (named as “CitiCards Bank, N.A.”) is
20
due November 18, 2022.
Citibank has requested, and Plaintiff has agreed, that
21
Citibank has up to and including December 2, 2022, to respond to Plaintiff’s
22
complaint to provide additional time for Citibank to investigate Plaintiff’s allegations
23
and for Citibank to prepare an adequate responsive pleading.
24
Although Plaintiff’s counsel consented to this extension, Citibank’s counsel
25
was unable to reach opposing counsel in time to authorize a stipulation and proposed
26
order, which is why this request is styled, instead, as an unopposed motion.
27
However, counsel for Citibank represents that Plaintiff’s counsel does not intend to
28
oppose this request. See Exhibit A, Email between Counsel (proposed settlement
DMWEST #17703735 v1
Case 2:22-cv-01271-RFB-EJY Document 18 Filed 11/21/22 Page 2 of 2
1
terms redacted). Citibank asserts that there is good cause under Fed. R. Civ. P.
2
6(b)(1) to extend this deadline, given that Citibank’s counsel was recently retained
3
and intends to discuss whether early resolution to this case is possible.
4
5
6
This is Citibank’s first request for extension and is made in good faith and not
for purposes of delay.
DATED this 18th day of November, 2022.
7
BALLARD SPAHR LLP
8
By: /s/ Andrew S. Clark
Joel E. Tasca
Nevada Bar No. 14124
Andrew S. Clark
Nevada Bar No. 14854
1980 Festival Plaza Drive, Suite 900
Las Vegas, Nevada 89135
9
10
(702) 471-7000 FAX (702) 471-7070
12
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89135
BALLARD SPAHR LLP
1980 FESTIVAL PLAZA DRIVE, SUITE 900
11
Attorneys for Defendant Citibank, N.A.
13
14
15
16
ORDER
17
IT IS SO ORDERED:
18
19
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
20
DATED:
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
DMWEST #17703735 v1
November 21, 2022
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?