Albright v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 18

ORDER Granting 17 Motion to Extend Time to Answer 1 Complaint. Citicards Bank, N.A. answer due 12/2/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 11/21/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KF)

Download PDF
Case 2:22-cv-01271-RFB-EJY Document 18 Filed 11/21/22 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 Joel E. Tasca Nevada Bar No. 14124 Andrew S. Clark Nevada Bar No. 14854 BALLARD SPAHR LLP 1980 Festival Plaza Drive, Suite 900 Las Vegas, Nevada 89135 Telephone: (702) 471-7000 Facsimile: (702) 471-7070 E-mail: tasca@ballardspahr.com E-mail: clarkas@ballardspahr.com 7 Attorneys for Defendant Citibank, N.A. 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 DISTRICT OF NEVADA MARY ALBRIGHT, (702) 471-7000 FAX (702) 471-7070 12 LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89135 BALLARD SPAHR LLP 1980 FESTIVAL PLAZA DRIVE, SUITE 900 11 CASE NO. 2:22-cv-01271-RFB-EJY Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.; EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC; CITICARDS BANK, N.A., 15 16 UNOPPOSED MOTION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (First Request) Defendants. 17 18 19 The response of defendant Citibank, N.A. (named as “CitiCards Bank, N.A.”) is 20 due November 18, 2022. Citibank has requested, and Plaintiff has agreed, that 21 Citibank has up to and including December 2, 2022, to respond to Plaintiff’s 22 complaint to provide additional time for Citibank to investigate Plaintiff’s allegations 23 and for Citibank to prepare an adequate responsive pleading. 24 Although Plaintiff’s counsel consented to this extension, Citibank’s counsel 25 was unable to reach opposing counsel in time to authorize a stipulation and proposed 26 order, which is why this request is styled, instead, as an unopposed motion. 27 However, counsel for Citibank represents that Plaintiff’s counsel does not intend to 28 oppose this request. See Exhibit A, Email between Counsel (proposed settlement DMWEST #17703735 v1 Case 2:22-cv-01271-RFB-EJY Document 18 Filed 11/21/22 Page 2 of 2 1 terms redacted). Citibank asserts that there is good cause under Fed. R. Civ. P. 2 6(b)(1) to extend this deadline, given that Citibank’s counsel was recently retained 3 and intends to discuss whether early resolution to this case is possible. 4 5 6 This is Citibank’s first request for extension and is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay. DATED this 18th day of November, 2022. 7 BALLARD SPAHR LLP 8 By: /s/ Andrew S. Clark Joel E. Tasca Nevada Bar No. 14124 Andrew S. Clark Nevada Bar No. 14854 1980 Festival Plaza Drive, Suite 900 Las Vegas, Nevada 89135 9 10 (702) 471-7000 FAX (702) 471-7070 12 LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89135 BALLARD SPAHR LLP 1980 FESTIVAL PLAZA DRIVE, SUITE 900 11 Attorneys for Defendant Citibank, N.A. 13 14 15 16 ORDER 17 IT IS SO ORDERED: 18 19 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 20 DATED: 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 DMWEST #17703735 v1 November 21, 2022

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?