Reeves v. Discover Your Mobility, Inc. et al

Filing 40

SCHEDULING ORDER granting 38 Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 9/17/2024. Motions due by 10/17/2024. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 11/18/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 6/3/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MAM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 BRADLEY S. MAINOR, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 7434 ADAM ELLIS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 14514 MAINOR ELLIS, LLP 8367 W. Flamingo Road, Suite 200 Las Vegas, Nevada 89147 Phone: (702) 450-5000 Fax: (702) 733-1106 adam@me-injury.com Attorneys for Plaintiff 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 ELLEN REEVES, individually, 11 CASE NO: 2:22-cv-01361-GMN-DJA Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 DISCOVER YOUR MOBILITY, INC., a foreign corporation; SOLO WORLD PARTNERS, LLC, a foreign limited liability company; DOE EMPLOYEES I-V, individually; DOE MANAGERS I-V, individually; ROE MANUFACTURERS I-X; ROE INSPECTION COMPANIES I-V; ROE DISTRIBUTORS I-X; DOE INDIVIDUALS I-X; and ROE BUSINESS ENTITIES I-X, inclusive, 14 15 16 17 18 19 RENEWED DISCOVERY PLAN AND [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER SPECIAL SCHEDULING REVIEW REQUESTED Defendants. 20 Plaintiff ELLEN REEVES, by and through her counsel of record ADAM ELLIS, ESQ.; 21 Discovery Your Mobility, Inc., by and through its counsel of record ADAM KNECHT, ESQ., and 22 SOLO WORLD PARTNERS, LLC, by and through its counsel of record JOHN KRIEGER, 23 ESQ.. hereby submit their Renewed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order pursuant to Fed R. 24 Civ. P. 26(f) and Local Rule 26-1, as Defendant Solo World Partners, LLC recently appeared in 25 the case. 26 I. REASON FOR SPECIAL SCHEDULING REVIEW 27 This case is relatively unusual, as Defendant Solo World Partners appeared in the case the 28 Page 1 of 4 1 day before discovery was to be completed. Plaintiff added Defendant Solo World via Motion, and 2 the discovery period waned while Plaintiff effectuated service of process and while Defendant 3 Solo World filed a responsive pleading. Thus, the parties seek discovery to be reopened. 4 II. ESTIMATED TIME REQUIRED FOR DISCOVERY: 5 The parties believe one-hundred twenty days from the date of submission is sufficient to 6 complete any remaining discovery, namely by and regarding Defendant Solo World Partners, The Discovery Cutoff will be September 17, LLC, as it appeared in the case on March 21, 2024. 2024 III. AMENDING THE PLEADINGS AND ADDING PARTIES: 7 8 9 10 This deadline has passed, and the parties do not believe it is necessary to extend this deadline. IV. FED. R. CIV. P. 26(A)(2) EXPERT DISCLOSURES: 11 In accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2), disclosures identifying experts shall be made 60 12 days prior to the discovery cutoff date. The deadline will be July 19, 2024 for Defendant Solo 13 World, as the deadline to disclose experts for Plaintiff and Defendant Discover Your Mobility, 14 Inc. has already passed. 15 16 17 18 The parties believe the deadline for Rebuttal Expert Disclosures should be thirty (30) days after the deadline for initial disclosures, making the deadline August 19, 2024. V. DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS: The parties shall file dispositive motions 30 days after the discovery cutoff date, and 19 therefore, not later than October 17, 2024. 20 VI. PRETRIAL ORDER: 21 If no dispositive motions are filed, and unless otherwise ordered by this Court, the Joint 22 Pretrial Order shall be filed 30 days after the date set for filing dispositive motions, and therefore, 23 not later than November 18, 2024. 24 In the event dispositive motions are filed, the date for filing the Joint Pretrial Order shall be 25 suspended until 30 days after the Court enters a ruling on dispositive motions, or otherwise by 26 further Court order. The disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3), and any objections 27 thereto, shall be included in the Joint Pretrial Order. 28 Page 2 of 4 1 VII. ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION: 2 The parties certify that they met and conferred about the possibility of using alternative 3 dispute resolution processes including mediation or arbitration. While the parties are open to 4 various means of resolution, they agree additional discovery must be obtained prior to scheduling 5 any kind of settlement conference. However, the parties will continue the informal settlement 6 discussions underway. 7 VIII. ALTERNATIVE FORMS OF CASE DISPOSITION: 8 The parties hereby certify that they considered consent to trial by a magistrate judge under 28 9 U.S.C. ยง 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, use of the Short Trial Program (General Order 2013-01). 10 The parties have not agreed to trial by a magistrate judge or the use of the short trial program, at 11 this time. 12 IX. ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE: 13 The parties did not come to any stipulations regarding providing discovery in an electronic 14 format, and will evaluate the need for special procedures for electronic evidence should the need 15 arise. 16 MAINOR ELLIS, LLP HALL & EVANS, LLC 17 /s/ Adam Ellis BRADLEY S. MAINOR, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 7434 ADAM ELLIS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 14514 8367 W. Flamingo Road, Suite 200 Las Vegas, Nevada 89147 Attorneys for Plaintiff /s/ Adam Knecht ADAM R. KNECHT, ESQ. 1160 North Town Center Drive, Suite 330 Las Vegas, NV 89144 Attorneys for Def. Discover Your Mobility, Inc. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC /s/ John Krieger Nevada Bar No. 6023 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 800 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 Email: jkrieger@dickinson-wright.com Attorneys for Def. Solo World Partners, LLC 27 28 Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the parties' stipulated discovery plan (ECF No. 38) is GRANTED IT IS SO ORDERED: ____________________________________ ____________________________________ UNITED MAGISTRATE JUDGE DANIEL J.STATES ALBREGTS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DATED: 6/3/2024 ___________ 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 4 of 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?