Mallari v. National Consumer Telecom & Utilities Exchange, Inc. et al

Filing 11

ORDER Granting 9 Motion to Extend Time (First Request). AT&T Services, Inc. answer due 10/17/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 9/16/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TRW)

Download PDF
Case 2:22-cv-01365-CDS-DJA Document 11 Filed 09/16/22 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP Ramir M. Hernandez, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 13146 7785 W. Sahara Ave., Suite 200 Las Vegas, NV 89117 (702) 475-7964; Fax: (702) 946-1345 rhernandez@wrightlegal.net Attorneys for Defendant, DIRECTV, LLC 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 JONALETTE MALLARI, 9 10 11 12 13 Case No.: 2:22-cv-01365-CDS-DJA Plaintiff, vs. NATIONAL CONSUMER TELECOM & UTILITIES EXCHANGE, INC., COX COMMUNICATIONS LAS VEGAS, INC., AT&T SERVICES, INC. AND BACKGROUNDCHECKS.COM LLC, UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST) 14 15 16 17 Defendants. Defendant, DIRECTV, LLC (incorrectly named AT&T Services, Inc.) (“Defendant”) (collectively “Parties”), by and through its counsel of record, hereby moves as follows: 18 On August 23, 2022, Plaintiff filed his Complaint [ECF No. 1]. Defendant was served with 19 Plaintiff’s Complaint on August 25, 2022. The deadline for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff’s 20 Complaint is September 15, 2022. The Parties have discussed extending the deadline for Defendant 21 to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint to allow for better investigation of the allegations and discuss 22 possible resolution of the matter. Defendant received consent for an extension via an email dated 23 September 13, 2022, and sent a draft of a Joint Motion to Defendant on September 15, 2022, but 24 Defendant did not receive a response from Plaintiff as to whether Defendant could include 25 Plaintiff’s counsel’s signature to the joint motion. 26 27 28 Therefore, Defendant moves to extend the deadline for Defendant to file its responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s Complaint to October 17, 2022. This is the first motion for an extension of time for Defendant to file its responsive Page 1 of 3 Case 2:22-cv-01365-CDS-DJA Document 11 Filed 09/16/22 Page 2 of 3 1 pleading. The extension is requested in good faith and is not for purposes of delay or prejudice to 2 any other party. 3 4 5 As part of this motion, Defendant agrees to participate in any Rule 26(f) conference that occurs during the pendency of this extension. DATED this 15th day of September, 2022. 6 7 8 9 10 11 WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP /s/ Ramir M. Hernandez Ramir M. Hernandez, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 13146 7785 W. Sahara Ave., Suite 200 Las Vegas, NV 89117 Attorneys for Defendant, DIRECTV, LLC 12 13 14 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED: 17 19 ___________________________________ UNITED J.STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DANIEL ALBREGTS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 20 DATED: _________________________ DATED: September 16, 2022 18 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 2 of 3 Case 2:22-cv-01365-CDS-DJA Document 11 Filed 09/16/22 Page 3 of 3 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 I HEREBY CERTIFY that I am an employee of WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP and 3 that I served the foregoing UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESOND TO 4 PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST) on the 15th day of September, 2022, to all 5 parties on the CM/ECF service list. 6 7 8 /s/ Jason Craig An Employee of WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 3 of 3 .

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?