Board of Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters Union Local 525 Health and Welfare Trust and Plan, et al v. Johnson Controls, Inc.
Filing
7
ORDER Granting #6 Stipulation for Extension of Time (First Request) re #1 Complaint. Johnson Controls, Inc. answer due 12/16/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 11/17/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - YAW)
Case 2:22-cv-01693-RFB-VCF Document 7 Filed 11/17/22 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Anthony L. Martin
Nevada Bar No. 8177
anthony.martin@ogletree.com
Suzanne L. Martin
Nevada Bar No. 8833
suzanne.martin@ogletree.com
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.
10801 W. Charleston Blvd.
Suite 500
Las Vegas, NV 89135
Telephone: 702.369.6800
Fax: 702.369.6888
8
Attorneys for Defendant Johnson Controls, Inc.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA
11
12
10801 W. Charleston Blvd.
Suite 500
Las Vegas, NV 89135
Telephone: 702.369.6800
Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
9
13
14
15
16
17
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
PLUMBERS AND PIPEFITTERS LOCAL
525 HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST
AND PLAN; BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF
THE PLUMBERS AND PIPEFITTERS
UNION LOCAL 525 PENSION PLAN; AND
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF PLUMBERS
AND PIPEFITTERS LOCAL UNION 525
APPRENTICE AND JOURNEYMAN
TRAINING TRUST FOR SOUTHERN
NEVADA,
20
STIPULATION AND ORDER
EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT
TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE
RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S
COMPLAINT
(FIRST REQUEST)
Plaintiffs,
18
19
Case No.: 2:22-cv-01693-RFB-VCF
vs.
JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC., a Wisconsin
corporation,
21
Defendant.
22
23
Pursuant to LR 6-1 and LR 6-2, Defendant Johnson Controls, Inc. (“Defendant”) and
24
Plaintiffs Board of Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters Union Local 525 Health and Welfare
25
Trust and Plan, the Plumbers and Pipefitters Union Local 525 Pension Plan, and the Plumbers and
26
Pipefitters Local Union 525 Apprentice and Journeyman Training Trust for Southern Nevada
27
(“Plaintiffs”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby
28
respectfully submit this Stipulation and Order Extending Time for Defendant to Answer or
1
Otherwise Respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint (the “Stipulation”). This is the first request for an
2
extension of time to file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint.
3
Defendant just recently retained Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. as their
4
counsel for this matter. The instant extension is made in good faith and is requested to provide
5
Defendant time in which to prepare an answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint.
6
The Parties stipulate and agree to a thirty (30) day extension of time from Wednesday,
7
November 16, 2022, up through and including Friday, December 16, 2022, for Defendant to
8
respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint. By entering into this Stipulation, none of the Parties waive any
9
rights they have under statute, law, or rule with respect to Plaintiffs’ Complaint.
10
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
11
DATED this 17th day of November, 2022.
DATED this 17th day of November, 2022.
12
BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK, LLP
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART,
P.C.
/s/ Christopher M. Humes
Bryce C. Loveland, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 10132
Christopher M. Humes, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12872
William D. Nobriga, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 14931
100 North City Parkway
Suite 1600
Las Vegas, NV 89106
/s/ Suzanne L. Martin
Anthony L. Martin
Nevada Bar No. 8177
Suzanne L. Martin
Nevada Bar No. 8833
10801 W. Charleston Blvd.
Suite 500
Las Vegas, NV 89135
13
10801 W. Charleston Blvd.
Suite 500
Las Vegas, NV 89135
Telephone: 702.369.6800
Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Case 2:22-cv-01693-RFB-VCF Document 7 Filed 11/17/22 Page 2 of 2
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Attorneys for Defendant
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
21
22
23
ORDER
24
25
26
27
28
IT SO ORDERED.
____________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11-17-2022
DATED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?