Hawatmeh et al v. City of Henderson et al

Filing 67

ORDER granting 66 Stipulation TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT ECF NO. 64 (FIRST REQUEST). Reply due April 16, 2024. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 3/27/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CAH)

Download PDF
10001 Park Run Drive Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 (702) 382-0711 FAX: (702) 382-5816 MARQUIS AURBACH 1 Marquis Aurbach Craig R. Anderson, Esq. 2 Nevada Bar No. 6882 10001 Park Run Drive 3 Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 Telephone: (702) 382-0711 4 Facsimile: (702) 382-5816 canderson@maclaw.com 5 Attorneys for Defendants 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 IEHAB HAWATMEH, individually; YASMEEN HAWATMEH, individually; 9 LAYTH HAWATMEH, individually and IEHAB HAWATMEH, as Administrator of 10 the ESTATE OF JOSEPH HAWATMEH, deceased, 11 Plaintiffs, 12 vs. 13 CITY OF HENDERSON, et. al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 Case Number: 2:22-cv-01786-APG-DJA STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (ECF NO. 64) (FIRST REQUEST) Defendants, by and through their attorney of record, Marquis Aurbach, and 17 Plaintiffs, by and through their attorney of record, Rogert P. Croteau & Associates, Ltd., 18 hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 19 1. The Plaintiffs filed their First Amended Complaint on January 15, 2024. 20 (ECF No. 59). 21 2. The Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint on 22 January 29, 2024. (ECF No. 60) 23 3. On February 12, 2024, the parties submitted a stipulation to extend the 24 deadline to oppose the Motion to Dismiss until March 18, 2024. (ECF No. 61). Said 25 stipulation was granted by the Court on February 13, 2024. (ECF No. 62) 26 4. On March 18, 2024, the parties submitted a stipulation to extend the deadline 27 to oppose the Motion to Dismiss until March 20, 2024. (ECF No. 63). Said stipulation was 28 granted by the Court on March 19, 2024. (ECF No. 65) Page 1 of 2 MAC:01434-015 5422112_1 1 5. Plaintiffs filed their Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss on March 19, 2024. 2 (ECF No. 64) 3 6. Defendants’ Reply is currently due March 26, 2024. 4 7. Defense Counsel and Plaintiff’s Counsel conducted depositions in an 5 unrelated case the week of March 15-22, 2024 and Defense Counsel did not have time to 6 prepare an adequate reply. 7 8. In addition, Defense Counsel has to prepare and travel to Pasadena, 8 California for a Ninth Circuit oral argument in Napouk v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police 9 Dep’t, 23-15726 on April 2, 2024. 10 9. Defendants respectfully request that the deadline to file their Reply to 10001 Park Run Drive Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 (702) 382-0711 FAX: (702) 382-5816 MARQUIS AURBACH 11 Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Motion to Dismiss be extended until April 16, 2024 12 10. 13 IT IS SO STIPULATED this 25th day of March, 2024. This Stipulation is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay. 14 MARQUIS AURBACH ROGER P. CROTEAU & ASSOCIATES, LTD. 15 By: s/Craig R. Anderson Craig R. Anderson, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 6882 17 10001 Park Run Drive Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 18 Attorneys for Defendants 16 By: s/Timothy E. Rhoda Roger P. Croteau, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 4958 Timothy E. Rhoda, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 7878 Las Vegas, Nevada 89102 Attorney for Plaintiffs 19 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 22 23 24 United States District Court Judge Dated: March 27, 2024 25 26 27 28 Page 2 of 2 MAC:01434-015 5422112_1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?