Davis v. The State of Nevada et al

Filing 41

ORDER granting 38 Stipulation for Revised Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 10/30/2024. Motions due by 11/29/2024. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 12/30/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 5/8/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MAM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Rene L. Valladares Federal Public Defender Nevada State Bar No. 11479 *Ryan Norwood Assistant Federal Public Defender New Hampshire Bar #15604 411 E. Bonneville Ave., Ste. 250 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 (702) 388-6577 Ryan_Norwood@fd.org *Amelia Bizzaro Assistant Federal Public Defender Wisconsin State Bar No. 1045709 411 E. Bonneville Ave., Ste. 250 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 (702) 388-6577 Amelia_Bizzaro@fd.org *Attorneys for Petitioner James Davis 11 U NITED S TATES D ISTRICT C OURT D ISTRICT OF N EVADA 12 13 James Anthony Davis, Plaintiff, 14 15 16 17 v. Michael Minev, et al., Case No. 2:22-cv-01796-RFB-DJA Stipulation for Revised Scheduling Order Defendants. 18 19 20 Pursuant to FRCP 16(b)(4) and Local Rule 26-2, the parties stipulate and agree 21 to modify/extend the Scheduling Order (ECF No. 33) and respectfully request the 22 Court approve the proposed schedule, set forth herein. This is the first stipulation for 23 the extension of these deadlines. This request is submitted at least twenty-one (21) 24 days or more before the close of discovery (July 18, 2024) is made in good faith, and 25 is supported by good cause. 26 1 STATEMENT OF FACTS IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION 2 On April 5, 2024, most of the Defendants answered Mr. Davis’s complaint (ECF 3 32). On April 22, this Court entered a scheduling order contemplating a 90 day period 4 for discovery to be completed, with an end date of July 18, 2024. ECF 33. 5 Counsel for the parties have since conferred, and agree that more time is 6 necessary to complete discovery. 7 involving complex medical issues, with multiple claims concerning different issue, 8 voluminous medical records, and which will likely involve experts. Accordingly the 9 parties would propose the following schedule be adopted, running from May 3, 2024. 10  11 12 Additional time is needed because this is a case The parties may engage in a discovery for a period of 180 days, ending on October 30, 2024;  Any and all pleadings that may be brought under Fed. R. Civ. P. 13 and 13 14, or joining additional parties under Fed. R. Civ. P. 19 and 20, must 14 be filed within 60 days, which is July 2, 2024. Any party causing 15 additional parties to be joined or brought into this action must 16 contemporaneously serve a copy of this Order on the new party or 17 parties. 18  Amendments to pleadings as provided for under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15, if 19 they are allowed without leave of Court, or motions for leave to amend, 20 must comply with LR 15-1 and must be filed and served within 90 days 21 from the date of this order, which is August 1, 2024. 22  Expert disclosures must be made on or before August 30, 2024, and 23 disclosures of rebuttal experts must be made on or before September 30, 24 2024. 25 26  Dispositive Motions: that they be filed and served no later than November 29, 2024; 2 1  Joint Pretrial Order: that it be due on December 30, 2024. If dispositive 2 motions are filed, the deadline for filing the joint pretrial order will be 3 suspended until 30 days after decision on the dispositive motions or 4 further court order. 5 CONCLUSION 6 Based on the foregoing and for good cause appearing, the Parties respectfully 7 request that the Court approve their Stipulation and alter the discovery deadlines as 8 set forth above. 9 10 Dated May 7, 2024 11 12 13 14 15 Aaron D. Ford Attorney General Rene L. Valladares Federal Public Defender 16 17 18 19 /s/ Jessica Brown _____________________________ /s/ Ryan Norwood Jessica Brown Deputy Attorney General Ryan Norwood Assistant Federal Public Defender 20 IT 21 IS SO ORDERED: 22 23 ______________________________ DANIEL J. ALBREGTS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dated: ________________________ DATED: 5/8/2024 24 25 26 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?