Zamora v. Seven Aromaz, Inc. et al

Filing 5

ORDER granting 4 Stipulation Re: 1 Complaint. Beverly Gannon answer due 11/23/2022; Gather Restaurant Group, LLC answer due 11/23/2022; Haliimaile Store, Inc. answer due 11/23/2022; Mr. Tuttle, LLC answer due 11/23/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 11/18/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)

Download PDF
Martin A. Little, Esq. (Nevada Bar No. 7067) 1 HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS PLLC 2 3800 Howard Hughes Pkwy., Ste. 1000 Las Vegas, NV 89169 3 Telephone: (702) 257-1483 Facsimile: (702) 567-1568 4 Attorneys for Defendants 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS PLLC 7 CASE NO.: 2:22-cv-01898-JAD-VCF GREGORY ZAMORA, an individual; 8 SEVEN AROMAZ, INC. d/b/a TOTAL FOOD SOLUTIONS, a California 9 Corporation, Plaintiff, 10 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS BEVERLY GANNON; HALIIMAILE STORE INC.; MR. TUTTLE, LLC; and GATHER RESTAURANT GROUP, LLC TO RESPOND TO GREGORY ZAMORA AND SEVEN AROMAZ, INC. D/B/A TOTAL FOOD SOLUTIONS COMPLAINT 11 vs. 12 BEVERLY GANNON, an individual; HALIIMAILE STORE INC., a Hawaii 13 Corporation; MR. TUTTLE, LLC, a Hawaii 14 limited liability Company; GATHER RESTAURANT GROUP, LLC, A foreign 15 limited liability company; DOES I through XV; and ROE Corporations I through X, 16 inclusive, 17 18 (FIRST REQUEST) Defendants. Pursuant to Rule 6(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and District of Nevada 19 Local Rule IA 6-1, Plaintiffs GREGORY ZAMORA AND SEVEN AROMAZ, INC. d/b/a 20 TOTAL FOOD, (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants BEVERLY GANNON; HALIIMAILE STORE 21 INC.; MR. TUTTLE, LLC; and GATHER RESTAURANT GROUP, LLC (“Defendants”), 22 through counsel, hereby agree and stipulate, as follows: 23 1. Plaintiffs filed their Complaint (the “Complaint”) on September 30, 2022. 24 2. Service was effectuated on all Defendants on October 12, 2022. 25 3. On November 9, 2022, Defendant GRG (with the consent of all other 26 Defendants) removed the action to federal court. 27 4. Under FRCP 81, Defendants have seven (7) days to respond to Plaintiffs’ 28 1 1 Complaint after removal, making any pleading or other response due on or before November 16, 2 2022. 3 5. Defendants and Plaintiffs stipulate to a 7-day extension of time for Defendants to 4 file and serve an answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint, which makes the response due 5 on November 23, 2022. 6 6. This is the first stipulation to extend the date for Defendants to answer or 7 otherwise respond to the Complaint. 8 IT IS SO AGREED AND STIPULATED: HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS PLLC 9 10 Dated this 16th day of November 2022. Dated this 16th day of November 2022. 11 HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS PLLC V3 LAW, LLC By: /s/ Martin A. Little Martin A. Little, Esq. Nevada Bar. No. 7067 3800 Howard Hughes Pkwy, Suite 1000 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 By: /s/ Jose E. Valenzuela III Jose E. Valenzuela III, Esq. 4484 S. Pecos Rd., Ste 140 Las Vegas, Nevada 89121 12 13 14 15 16 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for Defendants 17 18 19 20 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED: UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11-18-2022 DATED: ____________________________ 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?