Zamora v. Seven Aromaz, Inc. et al

Filing 5

ORDER granting #4 Stipulation Re: #1 Complaint. Beverly Gannon answer due 11/23/2022; Gather Restaurant Group, LLC answer due 11/23/2022; Haliimaile Store, Inc. answer due 11/23/2022; Mr. Tuttle, LLC answer due 11/23/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 11/18/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)

Martin A. Little, Esq. (Nevada Bar No. 7067)
1 HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS PLLC
2 3800 Howard Hughes Pkwy., Ste. 1000
Las Vegas, NV 89169
3 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
4 [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6

HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS PLLC

7

CASE NO.: 2:22-cv-01898-JAD-VCF

GREGORY ZAMORA, an individual;
8 SEVEN AROMAZ, INC. d/b/a TOTAL
FOOD SOLUTIONS, a California
9 Corporation,
Plaintiff,
10

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS
BEVERLY GANNON; HALIIMAILE
STORE INC.; MR. TUTTLE, LLC; and
GATHER RESTAURANT GROUP, LLC
TO RESPOND TO GREGORY
ZAMORA AND SEVEN AROMAZ,
INC. D/B/A TOTAL FOOD
SOLUTIONS COMPLAINT

11 vs.
12 BEVERLY GANNON, an individual;
HALIIMAILE STORE INC., a Hawaii
13 Corporation; MR. TUTTLE, LLC, a Hawaii
14 limited liability Company; GATHER
RESTAURANT GROUP, LLC, A foreign
15 limited liability company; DOES I through
XV; and ROE Corporations I through X,
16 inclusive,
17
18

(FIRST REQUEST)

Defendants.
Pursuant to Rule 6(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and District of Nevada

19 Local Rule IA 6-1, Plaintiffs GREGORY ZAMORA AND SEVEN AROMAZ, INC. d/b/a
20 TOTAL FOOD, (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants BEVERLY GANNON; HALIIMAILE STORE
21 INC.; MR. TUTTLE, LLC; and GATHER RESTAURANT GROUP, LLC (“Defendants”),
22 through counsel, hereby agree and stipulate, as follows:
23

1.

Plaintiffs filed their Complaint (the “Complaint”) on September 30, 2022.

24

2.

Service was effectuated on all Defendants on October 12, 2022.

25

3.

On November 9, 2022, Defendant GRG (with the consent of all other

26 Defendants) removed the action to federal court.
27

4.

Under FRCP 81, Defendants have seven (7) days to respond to Plaintiffs’

28
1

1 Complaint after removal, making any pleading or other response due on or before November 16,
2 2022.
3

5.

Defendants and Plaintiffs stipulate to a 7-day extension of time for Defendants to

4 file and serve an answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint, which makes the response due
5 on November 23, 2022.
6

6.

This is the first stipulation to extend the date for Defendants to answer or

7 otherwise respond to the Complaint.
8

IT IS SO AGREED AND STIPULATED:

HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS PLLC

9
10

Dated this 16th day of November 2022.

Dated this 16th day of November 2022.

11

HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS
PLLC

V3 LAW, LLC

By: /s/ Martin A. Little
Martin A. Little, Esq.
Nevada Bar. No. 7067
3800 Howard Hughes Pkwy, Suite 1000
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169

By: /s/ Jose E. Valenzuela III
Jose E. Valenzuela III, Esq.
4484 S. Pecos Rd., Ste 140
Las Vegas, Nevada 89121

12
13
14
15
16

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Attorneys for Defendants

17
18
19
20
21
22

IT IS SO ORDERED:
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11-18-2022
DATED: ____________________________

23
24
25
26
27
28
2