Reed v. Chambers et al

Filing 16

ORDER. It is therefore ordered that Plaintiff's 14 objection is overruled and Judge Albregts's 13 report and recommendation is adopted in full. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiff's 15 motio n for a status check and to add supplemental authority is DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER JUDGMENT accordingly. Signed by District Judge Anne R. Traum on 11/22/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ALZ)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3
4

MAX REED II,

5
6

Case No. 2:22-cv-02158-ART-DJA
Plaintiff,

v.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF U.S.
MAGISTRATE JUDGE

SHANNON CHAMBERS, ET AL.,

7

Defendants.

8
9

Pro se Plaintiff Max Reed II filed this action against various defendants for

10

claims related to working without pay or under the minimum wage while

11

incarcerated. (ECF No. 1.) U.S. Magistrate Judge Albregts issued a report and

12

recommendation recommending that the case be dismissed without prejudice for

13

failure to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 13.) Plaintiff filed an objection,

14

requesting that the Court remove this case to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

15

(ECF No. 14.) Plaintiff also filed a motion for a status check and a request to add

16

supplemental authority to his objection. (ECF No. 15.) The Court overrules

17

Plaintiff’s objection and adopts Judge Albregts’s report and recommendation in

18

full.

19

I.

STANDARD OF REVIEW

20

Under the Federal Magistrates Act, a Court “may accept, reject, or modify,

21

in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by [a] magistrate

22

judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Where a party timely objects to a magistrate judge's

23

report

24

novo determination of those portions of the [report and recommendation] to which

25

objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A court is not required to conduct “any

26

review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection.” Thomas v.

27

Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).

and

recommendation,

the

court

28

1

is

required

to

“make

a de

1

II.

BACKGROUND

2

Plaintiff sues former Nevada Labor Commissioner Shannon Chambers;

3

Labor Director Terry Reynolds; George B., a caseworker at Southern Desert

4

Correctional Center (SDCC); L. Anderson, a caseworker at SDCC; Ms. Hill, an

5

inmate employment opportunity officer at High Desert State Prison (HDSP);

6

Dwayne Wilson, a culinary supervisor at HDSP; Ms. Gomez, a caseworker at

7

SDCC; Mr. Livingston, a correctional officer and work supervisor at SDCC;

8

Charles Daniels, the former Nevada Department of Corrections (NDOC) Director;

9

William Hutchings, a former SDCC warden; Silver State Industries; Brian

10

Williams, a warden at HDSP; and Jordan Noles, a canteen supervisor at SDCC.

11

Plaintiff asserts that while incarcerated, he worked without pay or for pay well

12

under minimum wage. He brings four causes of action: (1) violation of his

13

Fourteenth Amendment due process rights; (2) violations of Article 15, Section

14

16 and Article 1, Section 8 of the Nevada Constitution; (3) violations of Article 1,

15

Section 1 of the Nevada Constitution; and (4) violations of California laws.

16

III.

DISCUSSION

17

As Judge Albregts explained, the Court previously granted Plaintiff’s

18

request to proceed in forma pauperis and screened the first amended complaint

19

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF Nos. 3, 12). The Court dismissed the

20

complaint with leave to amend and required that an amended complaint be filed

21

by January 2, 2024. (ECF No. 12.) Judge Albregts informed Plaintiff that failure

22

to comply with the order would result in recommended dismissal of the case. (Id.

23

at 6.) Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint or request an extension to the

24

deadline for doing so. As such, Judge Albregts recommended dismissal without

25

prejudice.

26

Plaintiff filed an objection to the R&R, requesting that the Court remove

27

this case to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. (ECF No. 14 at 1.) This Court

28

cannot remove this case to the Ninth Circuit. Plaintiff may file a notice of appeal

2

1

from this order to the Ninth Circuit.

2

In the objection, Plaintiff explains that he did not feel an amendment to the

3

complaint was necessary. (Id. at 2.) Plaintiff also makes several objections to

4

Judge Albregt’s prior order dismissing his amended complaint without prejudice.

5

Plaintiff argues that the Court ignored the plain language of Article 15,

6

Section 16 of the Nevada Constitution and ignored his contention that several

7

defendants were liable for violating his right to receive minimum wage under the

8

Nevada constitution. (Id.) In his order dismissing Plaintiff’s complaint without

9

prejudice, Judge Albregts discussed this claim and explained that although

10

Article 15, Section 16 provides a mandated minimum wage, the Nevada Supreme

11

Court has concluded that Article 15, Section 16 does not protect inmates working

12

in inmate work programs. (ECF No. 12 at 4-5 (citing Gonzalez v. State, 515 P.3d

13

318 (Nev. 2022).)

14

Plaintiff also argues that the Court misapplied state law which classified

15

Plaintiff as a state employee, which he is not. (ECF No. 14 at 3.) Judge Albregts

16

explained that Plaintiff could amend his complaint to explain whether he worked

17

for a private employer, rather than a state entity. (ECF No. 12 at 3-4.) Plaintiff

18

has declined to do so.

19

//

20

//

21

//

22

//

23

//

24

//

25

//

26

//

27

//

28

//

3

1

IV.

CONCLUSION

2

It is therefore ordered that Plaintiff’s objection (ECF No. 14) is overruled

3

and Judge Albregts’s report and recommendation (ECF No. 13) is adopted in full.

4

Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice.

5

Plaintiff’s motion for a status check and to add supplemental authority

6
7

(ECF No. 15) is DENIED AS MOOT.
The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER JUDGMENT accordingly.

8
9

DATED THIS 22nd day of November 2024.

10
11
12
13

ANNE R. TRAUM
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

4