Santacruz v. Daniels et al
Filing
93
ORDER Granting 92 Stipulation for Revised Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 9/2/2025. Motions by 10/2/2025. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order by 11/3/2025. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 3/6/2025. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JG)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Rene L. Valladares
Federal Public Defender
Nevada State Bar No. 11479
*Ryan Norwood
Assistant Federal Public Defender
New Hampshire Bar #15604
Ryan_Norwood@fd.org
* Christopher P. Frey
Assistant Federal Public Defender
Nevada State Bar No. 10589
411 E. Bonneville Ave., Ste. 250
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
(702) 388-6577
Chris_Frey@fd.org
*Attorneys for Petitioner Gabriel Santacruz
10
U NITED S TATES D ISTRICT C OURT
D ISTRICT OF N EVADA
11
12
Gabriel Santacruz,
13
14
15
16
Plaintiff,
v.
Charles Daniels, et al.,
Case No. 2:23-cv-0258-APG-BNW
Fifth Stipulation for Revised
Scheduling Order
Defendants.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Pursuant to FRCP 16(b)(4) and Local Rule 26-2, and this Court’s minute order
(ECF No. 90) the parties stipulate and agree to a new scheduling order concerning
the filing of an amended complaint and the completion of discovery. This is the fifth
stipulation concerning the discovery deadlines in this case. This request is made in
good faith and is supported by good cause.
1
STATEMENT OF FACTS IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION
2
This case began with a pro se complaint filed by Plaintiff Gabriel Santacruz in
3
February 2023, followed by a First Amended Complaint (FAC) on April 25, 2023. ECF
4
1, 6. The Court subsequently appointed counsel for Mr. Santacruz (ECF 16, 22), who
5
entered an appearance on December 1, 2023 (ECF 23). The Defendants, represented
6
by the Attorney General, filed an Answer on December 12 (ECF 24). The parties
7
conferred and submitted a stipulated discovery plan on January 10, 2024, which the
8
Court approved. (ECF 26. 27).
9
The parties have since exchanged initial disclosures and Mr. Santacruz served
10
a Request for Production.
11
productions sought by the Attorney General, the Defendants provided a First
12
Supplement on March 1 and a Second Supplement and response to Plaintiff’s request
13
for production on March 8, 2024. The provided discovery already totals more than
14
1,000 pages.
After the parties agreed on an extension of time for
15
The parties most recently submitted a joint scheduling order in July 2024,
16
which the Court adopted. ECF No. 45. The parties afterwards completed a deposition
17
of Defendant B. Omandac in September 2024. That aside, the parties have been
18
largely engaged with extensive and contested procedural litigation since the filing of
19
the last scheduling order, including Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file the Second
20
Amended Complaint (SAC), the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the SAC, Defendants’
21
motions for a stay pending the resolution of that Motion, and Plaintiff’s motion to
22
reconsider the granting of that request. See generally ECF Nos. 46-88.
23
On February 16, 2025 the Court entered an order on the Motion to Dismiss,
24
granting it in part but giving Plaintiff leave to amend the complaint to address the
25
issues noted in the Court’s order. The Court subsequently directed the parties to
26
submit a Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order by March 5, 2025.
2
1
Having conferred, the parties accordingly request the Court set the following
2
deadlines for the filing of additional pleadings and the completion of discovery in this
3
case:
4
?
Discovery in this action be completed on or before September 2, 2025;
5
?
The amended complaint this Court gave the Plaintiff leave to file (ECF
6
89) shall be submitted by March 20, 2025;
7
?
Defendants shall file a response to this pleading by April 10, 2025;
8
?
Expert disclosures must be made on or before July 3, 2025, and
9
10
disclosures of rebuttal experts must be made on August 5, 2025.
?
11
12
Dispositive Motions shall be served and filed no later than October 2,
2025;
?
Joint Pretrial Order: that it be due on November 3 2025. If dispositive
13
motions are filed, the deadline for filing the joint pretrial order will be
14
suspended until 30 days after decision on the dispositive motions or
15
further court order.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
3
1
CONCLUSION
2
Based on the foregoing and for good cause appearing, the Parties respectfully
3
request that the Court approve their stipulated discovery plan and scheduling order.
4
5
Dated March 5, 2025,
6
7
8
9
10
11
Aaron D. Ford
Attorney General
Rene L. Valladares
Federal Public Defender
s/Leo T. Hendges
Leo T. Hendges
Deputy Attorney General
s/ Ryan Norwood
Ryan Norwood
Assistant Federal Public Defender
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED:
14
15
16
______________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
17
March 6, 2025
Dated: ________________________
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?