Santacruz v. Daniels et al

Filing 93

ORDER Granting 92 Stipulation for Revised Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 9/2/2025. Motions by 10/2/2025. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order by 11/3/2025. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 3/6/2025. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JG)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Rene L. Valladares Federal Public Defender Nevada State Bar No. 11479 *Ryan Norwood Assistant Federal Public Defender New Hampshire Bar #15604 Ryan_Norwood@fd.org * Christopher P. Frey Assistant Federal Public Defender Nevada State Bar No. 10589 411 E. Bonneville Ave., Ste. 250 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 (702) 388-6577 Chris_Frey@fd.org *Attorneys for Petitioner Gabriel Santacruz 10 U NITED S TATES D ISTRICT C OURT D ISTRICT OF N EVADA 11 12 Gabriel Santacruz, 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff, v. Charles Daniels, et al., Case No. 2:23-cv-0258-APG-BNW Fifth Stipulation for Revised Scheduling Order Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Pursuant to FRCP 16(b)(4) and Local Rule 26-2, and this Court’s minute order (ECF No. 90) the parties stipulate and agree to a new scheduling order concerning the filing of an amended complaint and the completion of discovery. This is the fifth stipulation concerning the discovery deadlines in this case. This request is made in good faith and is supported by good cause. 1 STATEMENT OF FACTS IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION 2 This case began with a pro se complaint filed by Plaintiff Gabriel Santacruz in 3 February 2023, followed by a First Amended Complaint (FAC) on April 25, 2023. ECF 4 1, 6. The Court subsequently appointed counsel for Mr. Santacruz (ECF 16, 22), who 5 entered an appearance on December 1, 2023 (ECF 23). The Defendants, represented 6 by the Attorney General, filed an Answer on December 12 (ECF 24). The parties 7 conferred and submitted a stipulated discovery plan on January 10, 2024, which the 8 Court approved. (ECF 26. 27). 9 The parties have since exchanged initial disclosures and Mr. Santacruz served 10 a Request for Production. 11 productions sought by the Attorney General, the Defendants provided a First 12 Supplement on March 1 and a Second Supplement and response to Plaintiff’s request 13 for production on March 8, 2024. The provided discovery already totals more than 14 1,000 pages. After the parties agreed on an extension of time for 15 The parties most recently submitted a joint scheduling order in July 2024, 16 which the Court adopted. ECF No. 45. The parties afterwards completed a deposition 17 of Defendant B. Omandac in September 2024. That aside, the parties have been 18 largely engaged with extensive and contested procedural litigation since the filing of 19 the last scheduling order, including Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file the Second 20 Amended Complaint (SAC), the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the SAC, Defendants’ 21 motions for a stay pending the resolution of that Motion, and Plaintiff’s motion to 22 reconsider the granting of that request. See generally ECF Nos. 46-88. 23 On February 16, 2025 the Court entered an order on the Motion to Dismiss, 24 granting it in part but giving Plaintiff leave to amend the complaint to address the 25 issues noted in the Court’s order. The Court subsequently directed the parties to 26 submit a Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order by March 5, 2025. 2 1 Having conferred, the parties accordingly request the Court set the following 2 deadlines for the filing of additional pleadings and the completion of discovery in this 3 case: 4 ? Discovery in this action be completed on or before September 2, 2025; 5 ? The amended complaint this Court gave the Plaintiff leave to file (ECF 6 89) shall be submitted by March 20, 2025; 7 ? Defendants shall file a response to this pleading by April 10, 2025; 8 ? Expert disclosures must be made on or before July 3, 2025, and 9 10 disclosures of rebuttal experts must be made on August 5, 2025. ? 11 12 Dispositive Motions shall be served and filed no later than October 2, 2025; ? Joint Pretrial Order: that it be due on November 3 2025. If dispositive 13 motions are filed, the deadline for filing the joint pretrial order will be 14 suspended until 30 days after decision on the dispositive motions or 15 further court order. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 3 1 CONCLUSION 2 Based on the foregoing and for good cause appearing, the Parties respectfully 3 request that the Court approve their stipulated discovery plan and scheduling order. 4 5 Dated March 5, 2025, 6 7 8 9 10 11 Aaron D. Ford Attorney General Rene L. Valladares Federal Public Defender s/Leo T. Hendges Leo T. Hendges Deputy Attorney General s/ Ryan Norwood Ryan Norwood Assistant Federal Public Defender 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED: 14 15 16 ______________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 March 6, 2025 Dated: ________________________ 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?