Greenstone et al v. LVMPD (Police Department) et al

Filing 64

ORDER granting 63 Stipulation to Extend Time to File Reply Briefs in Support of the Motions for Summary Judgment. The Parties hereby stipulate and agree that Defendants shall have until July 22, 2024 (30 days after the filing of the oppositions to the Motion for Summary Judgment) to file their reply briefs. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 5/8/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CAH)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 MCNUTT LAW FIRM, P.C. Daniel R. McNutt, Esq., Bar No. 7815 Matthew C. Wolf, Esq., Bar No. 10801 11441 Allerton Park Drive, #100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89135 Tel.: (702) 384-1170 / Fax.: (702) 384-5529 drm@mcnuttlawfirm.com mcw@mcnuttlawfirm.com Counsel for Defendant Vidal Contreras 6 United States District Court 7 District of Nevada 8 9 10 11 12 13 MAUREEN GREENSTONE, an individual and as appointed Guardian of SETH DALE GREENSTONE, an Adult Protected Person, Plaintiff, Case No.: 2:23-cv-00290-GMN-NJK Stipulation and Order to Extend Time to File Reply Briefs in Support of the Motions for Summary Judgment LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT; VIDAL CONTRERAS; and DOES 1–10, inclusive, Defendants. 14 15 Plaintiff Maureen Greenstone, Defendant Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department 16 (LVMPD), and Defendant Officer Vidal Contreras (together, the Parties) hereby stipulate to 17 extend the time for Defendants to file reply briefs in support of their Motions for Summary 18 Judgment: 19 The Parties stipulate and agree to the following: 20 1. 21 On April 29, 2024, Defendant Vidal Contreras filed his Motion for Summary Judgment. Dkt. 52. 22 2. 23 Dkt. 56. 24 3. On May 1, 2024, Defendant LVMPD filed its Motion for Summary Judgment. The Parties have already stipulated to extend the filing date of Plaintiff’s 25 oppositions to the Motions for Summary Judgment by 30 days to June 21, 2024. Dkt. 60. 26 The Court granted the stipulation and set the reply date of June 28, 2024 for the Defendants. 27 Dkt. 61. 28 Page 1 of 2 1 4. The Parties hereby stipulate and agree that Defendants shall have until July 2 22, 2024 (30 days after the filing of the oppositions to the Motion for Summary Judgment) 3 to file their reply briefs. 4 The Parties agree that this extension will not unnecessarily delay resolution of this 5 case. The extension will ensure that the Parties can prepare adequate briefs for the Court to 6 make a ruling on the merits. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 SO STIPULATED on May 7, 2024. MCNUTT LAW FIRM, P.C. MARQUIS AURBACH COFFING /s/ Dan McNutt Dan McNutt, Esq. (Bar No. 7815) Matt Wolf, Esq. (Bar No. 10801) 11441 Allerton Park Drive, Suite 100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89135 Attorneys for Defendant Vidal Contreras /s/ Craig Anderson Craig Anderson, Esq. (Bar No. 6882) 10001 Park Run Drive Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 Attorneys for Defendant LVMPD PETER GOLDSTEIN LAW CORP /s/ Peter Goldstein Peter Goldstein, Esq. (Bar No. 6992) 10161 Park Run Drive, Suite 150 Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 Attorneys for Plaintiffs IT IS SO ORDERED: ___________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE May 8, 2024 DATED:______________________________ 25 26 27 28 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?