Greenstone et al v. LVMPD (Police Department) et al
Filing
64
ORDER granting 63 Stipulation to Extend Time to File Reply Briefs in Support of the Motions for Summary Judgment. The Parties hereby stipulate and agree that Defendants shall have until July 22, 2024 (30 days after the filing of the oppositions to the Motion for Summary Judgment) to file their reply briefs. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 5/8/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CAH)
1
2
3
4
5
MCNUTT LAW FIRM, P.C.
Daniel R. McNutt, Esq., Bar No. 7815
Matthew C. Wolf, Esq., Bar No. 10801
11441 Allerton Park Drive, #100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89135
Tel.: (702) 384-1170 / Fax.: (702) 384-5529
drm@mcnuttlawfirm.com
mcw@mcnuttlawfirm.com
Counsel for Defendant Vidal Contreras
6
United States District Court
7
District of Nevada
8
9
10
11
12
13
MAUREEN GREENSTONE, an individual
and as appointed Guardian of SETH DALE
GREENSTONE, an Adult Protected
Person,
Plaintiff,
Case No.: 2:23-cv-00290-GMN-NJK
Stipulation and Order to Extend Time
to File Reply Briefs in Support of the
Motions for Summary Judgment
LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE
DEPARTMENT; VIDAL CONTRERAS;
and DOES 1–10, inclusive,
Defendants.
14
15
Plaintiff Maureen Greenstone, Defendant Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
16
(LVMPD), and Defendant Officer Vidal Contreras (together, the Parties) hereby stipulate to
17
extend the time for Defendants to file reply briefs in support of their Motions for Summary
18
Judgment:
19
The Parties stipulate and agree to the following:
20
1.
21
On April 29, 2024, Defendant Vidal Contreras filed his Motion for Summary
Judgment. Dkt. 52.
22
2.
23
Dkt. 56.
24
3.
On May 1, 2024, Defendant LVMPD filed its Motion for Summary Judgment.
The Parties have already stipulated to extend the filing date of Plaintiff’s
25
oppositions to the Motions for Summary Judgment by 30 days to June 21, 2024. Dkt. 60.
26
The Court granted the stipulation and set the reply date of June 28, 2024 for the Defendants.
27
Dkt. 61.
28
Page 1 of 2
1
4.
The Parties hereby stipulate and agree that Defendants shall have until July
2
22, 2024 (30 days after the filing of the oppositions to the Motion for Summary Judgment)
3
to file their reply briefs.
4
The Parties agree that this extension will not unnecessarily delay resolution of this
5
case. The extension will ensure that the Parties can prepare adequate briefs for the Court to
6
make a ruling on the merits.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
SO STIPULATED on May 7, 2024.
MCNUTT LAW FIRM, P.C.
MARQUIS AURBACH COFFING
/s/ Dan McNutt
Dan McNutt, Esq. (Bar No. 7815)
Matt Wolf, Esq. (Bar No. 10801)
11441 Allerton Park Drive, Suite 100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89135
Attorneys for Defendant Vidal Contreras
/s/ Craig Anderson
Craig Anderson, Esq. (Bar No. 6882)
10001 Park Run Drive
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
Attorneys for Defendant LVMPD
PETER GOLDSTEIN LAW CORP
/s/ Peter Goldstein
Peter Goldstein, Esq. (Bar No. 6992)
10161 Park Run Drive, Suite 150
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
IT IS SO ORDERED:
___________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
May 8, 2024
DATED:______________________________
25
26
27
28
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?