Covarrubias et al v. Key Insurance Company

Filing 42

ORDER Rejecting 41 Second Proposed Joint Pretrial Order. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 3/20/2025. Signed by Chief Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 3/4/2025. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MAM)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 LUCIA COVARRUBIAS, MARIA DE JESUS RODRIGUEZ, and ESTATE OF 4 OSCAR ALFREDO AYALA, individually and as assignees of PABLO C. TORRES5 ESPARZA, 6 Case No.: 2:23-cv-00291-APG-DJA Order Rejecting Second Proposed Joint Pretrial Order [ECF No. 41] Plaintiffs, 7 v. 8 KEY INSURANCE COMPANY, 9 Defendant 10 I previously rejected the parties’ proposed Joint Pretrial Order because it did not comply 11 with Local Rules 16-3 and 16-4. ECF No. 40. The parties have filed a second proposed Joint 12 Pretrial Order (ECF No. 41), but it has errors also. Specifically, the parties stipulate into 13 evidence 154 of the plaintiffs’ exhibits, but the defendant then objects to scores of those same 14 exhibits. Compare ECF No. 41 at 18-28 with 31-43. If the exhibits are stipulated into evidence, 15 there should be no objections. In addition, the plaintiffs claim they are objecting to two of the 16 defendant’s exhibits, but offer no objections. See ECF No. 41 at 43. 17 I THEREFORE ORDER that the parties’ Joint Pretrial Order (ECF No. 41) is 18 REJECTED. The parties will submit a new proposed Joint Pretrial Order that complies with 19 Local Rules 16-3 and 16-4 by March 20, 2025. 20 DATED this 4th day of March, 2025. 21 22 23 ANDREW P. GORDON CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?