Mere v. State of Nevada, Desert Willow Treatment Center et al
Filing
32
ORDER granting 31 Stipulation Allowing Plaintiff to Amend and File a Second Amended Complaint. Amended Complaint deadline: 2/10/2024. Responses due by 2/20/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 2/5/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CAH)
Case 2:23-cv-00487-JCM-DJA Document 31 Filed 02/02/24 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
Guinness Ohazuruike, Esq.
GUINNESS LAW FIRM
Nevada Bar No. 11231
6845 W. Charleston Blvd, #A
Las Vegas, Nevada 89117
Telephone:(702) 473-9300
Facsimile:(702) 920-8112
guinnesslaw@gmail.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA.
7
8
9
GODFREY MERE, an individual,
10
Case No. 2:23-CV-00487-JCM-DJA
Plaintiff,
11
vs.
12
13
14
15
STATE OF NEVADA, DEPARTMENT
OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,
DIVISION OF CHILD AND FAMILY
SERVICES, Desert Willow Treatment
Center; DOES 1–10 and ROES I–X,
STIPULATION AND ORDER
ALLOWING PLAINTIFF TO
AMEND AND FILE A SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT
16
Defendants,
17
18
19
Plaintiff, Godfrey Mere (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant, State of Nevada, Department
20
of Health and Human Services, Division of Child and Family Services, Desert Willow
21
Treatment Center, (“Defendant”), by and through their respective attorneys, hereby submit
22
this Stipulation And Order Allowing Plaintiff To Amend And File A Second Amended
23
Complaint.
24
Following the Early Neutral Evaluation by the parties and upon further review of
25
the casefile, Plaintiff desires to abandon and delete some causes of actions including the
26
27
28
claims pertaining to discrimination / disparate treatment of failure to hire or promote to the
positions of Director of Nursing, and Hospital Supervisor, as well as the claim for Hostile
Work Environment based on national origin.
1
_________________________________________________
SAO re Second Amended Complaint
Case 2:23-cv-00487-JCM-DJA Document 31 Filed 02/02/24 Page 2 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
The parties hereby agree and stipulate as follows:
1. Plaintiff shall amend and file the proposed Second Amended Complaint within five
(5) days from the date of the Order allowing amendment.
2. Defendant shall amend and file a responsive pleading within ten (10) days from the
date plaintiff files the Second Amended Complaint.
3. By entering into this stipulation, the parties do not waive any rights they have under
statute, law, or rule with respect to the Second Amended Complaint and/or
responsive pleading to the Second Amended Complaint.
9
10
Dated this January 30, 2024.
Dated this January 30, 2024
/s/Guinness Ohazuruike___
Guinness Ohazuruike, Esq.
GUINNESS LAW FIRM
6845 W. Charleston Blvd, #A
Las Vegas, Nevada 89117
Telephone:(702) 473-9300
Facsimile:(702) 920-8112
Email: guinnesslaw@gmail.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
/s/ Paul Mata_______
Paul Mata, Esq.
Deputy Attorney General
Office of the Attorney General
555 E. Washington Ave. #3900
Telephone (702) 486 0661
Facsimile (702) 486 3768
Email: pmata@ag.nv.gov
Attorney for Defendant
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
ORDER
Having reviewed the above Stipulation And Order agreed to by the parties;
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
25
26
___________________________
United States Magistrate Judge
2/5/2024
Dated:____________
27
28
2
_________________________________________________
SAO re Second Amended Complaint
Case 2:23-cv-00487-JCM-DJA Document 31-1 Filed 02/02/24 Page 1 of 9
1
2
3
4
5
Guinness Ohazuruike, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 11231
GUINNESS LAW FIRM
6845 W. Charleston Blvd, #A
Las Vegas, Nevada 89117
Telephone:(702) 473-9300
Facsimile:(702) 920-8112
guinnesslaw@gmail.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA.
7
8
9
GODFREY MERE, an individual,
10
Case No. 2:23-CV-00487-JCM-DJA
Plaintiff,
11
vs.
12
13
14
15
STATE OF NEVADA, DEPARTMENT
OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,
DIVISION OF CHILD AND FAMILY
SERVICES, Desert Willow Treatment
Center; DOES 1–10 and ROES I–X,
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
16
17
Defendants,
18
19
COMES NOW Plaintiff, Godfrey Mere, by and through his attorney, Guinness
20
Ohazuruike, Esq., of the Guinness Law Firm, amends his Complaint and alleges against
21
Defendant, State of Nevada, Department of Health & Human Services, Division of Child &
22
Family Service, Desert Willow Treatment Center, as follows:
23
24
INTRODUCTION
1. Plaintiff, Godfrey Mere, a citizen of United States and a Nigerian national, alleges
25
that agents, employees, and directors of Defendant subjected him to discriminatory
26
and disparate treatments based on his national origin and that tangible employment
27
actions adversely affected his job performance and the terms of his employment.
28
PARTIES
1
_________________________________________________
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
Case 2:23-cv-00487-JCM-DJA Document 31-1 Filed 02/02/24 Page 2 of 9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
2. Plaintiff, Godfrey Mere, is a citizen of United States and a Nigerian national,
employed by State of Nevada, Department of Health & Human Services, Division
of Child & Family Services, and working as a registered nurse at defendant’s
facility the Desert Willow Treatment Center.
3. Plaintiff, Godfrey Mere is domiciled in North Las Vegas, Clark County, Nevada.
4. Plaintiff is a member of the protected class, within the meaning of Title VII of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e, et seq.
5. Defendant, State of Nevada, Department of Health and Human Services, Division
of Child & Family Services, is an agency, organ, entity and/or department of the
State of Nevada providing services and doing business as a mental health treatment
facility in Las Vegas commonly known as Desert Willow Treatment Center.
6. At all relevant times Defendant employed more than fifteen employees and is an
12
employer within the meaning of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as
13
amended, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e, et seq.
14
7. At all relevant times, Defendant employed more than five hundred employees in
15
clinics, offices, and affiliates statewide including Desert Willow Treatment Center.
16
8. At all relevant times the conducts alleged herein were the acts or omissions of the
17
Defendant through its employees or administrators, managers, and agents including
18
but not limited to Gwendolyn Greene, African American; Ronnika Rupert, African
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
American; Abbie Jenkins, white American; Viara Hristov, white American; Marc
Yee, Asian American.
9. At all relevant times the conduct of the named employees, directors, manager, and
supervisor and agents, were within the scope of their employments, in concert with
each other and on behalf of and for the benefit of their employer, the Defendant.
10. Defendant is liable for the acts and omissions of the employees, agents, managers,
directors, and supervisors pursuant to the legal theory of vicarious liability and/or
respondeat superior and/or agency and/or direction.
11. Defendants DOES and ROES I–X are individuals and entities whose names and
capacities are unknown to Plaintiff who therefore sues them by fictitious names.
2
_________________________________________________
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
Case 2:23-cv-00487-JCM-DJA Document 31-1 Filed 02/02/24 Page 3 of 9
1
2
3
4
Plaintiff shall seek leave of this court to amend the Complaint to substitute the true
names of each such Defendants when information is ascertained.
12. Plaintiff shall seek permission of this honorable Court to amend the Complaint in
line with evidence obtained through discovery and or witness testimony.
JURISDICTION
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
13. This is an action arising under federal law, authorized, and instituted pursuant to:
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. Section(s) 2000e
et seq. and 42 U.S.C. Section 1981A as amended.
14. The jurisdiction of this Court is predicated upon 28 U.S.C. Section 1331 and 1343,
to redress the unlawful deprivation of plaintiff's rights secured, guaranteed, and
protected by federal law.
15. The Jurisdiction of this court is also appropriate under 42 U.S.C §§1981, 1983, and
12
28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202 relating to declaratory judgments.
13
16. The jurisdiction of this Court is also predicated upon the decision of the United
14
States Supreme Court in Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer, 427 U.S. 445, 447-48 (1976) that the
15
Eleventh Amendment is not a jurisdictional bar to Title VII claims in federal court.
16
17. The jurisdiction of this court is further predicated upon the 1972 Amendments to
17
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, pursuant to §5 of the Fourteenth Amend.
18
VENUE
19
20
18. Venue is proper in Clark County, Nevada wherein Plaintiff resides, and Defendant
conducts businesses, where the alleged discriminatory conduct occurred.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
ADMINISTRATIVE PREREQUISITES
19. Plaintiff has complied and exhausted all necessary administrative prerequisites for
commencing an action under federal and Nevada laws through the following:
A. On or about June 6, 2022 Plaintiff contacted the Nevada Equal Rights Commission
(NERC) in tandem with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).
On October 16, 2022 Plaintiff filed a Charge of Discrimination with the NERC and
the EEOC.
28
3
_________________________________________________
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
Case 2:23-cv-00487-JCM-DJA Document 31-1 Filed 02/02/24 Page 4 of 9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
B. In the Charge the Plaintiff complained that Defendant through its agents subjected
him to among others, discrimination based on national origin, retaliation, disparate
treatment, and harassment in the workplace. Attached is the Charge as Exh. 1.
C. Plaintiff promptly and diligently accommodated all requests for information and
fully cooperated in the administrative agency’s processing of this matter.
D. On March 21, 2023, the EEOC informed Plaintiff that in view of his state agency
respondent his Complaint has been forwarded to the United States Department of
Justice for further review.
E. On March 31, 2023, the United Stated Department of Justice issued a Notice of
Right to Sue indicating that Plaintiff has the right to institute a civil action within 90
days of the Notice. Attached is copy of the Notice of Right to Sue as Exh. 2.
GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
12
20. Plaintiff was hired by Defendant on or about July 10, 2010, as Registered Nurse
13
at Desert Willow Treatment Center, a mental health facility under the ownership,
14
management, and supervision of the State of Nevada.
15
21. Plaintiff has a Bachelor of Nursing Science and Master of Nursing Science degrees.
16
22. Plaintiff worked 12 years as a registered nurse at Desert Willow Treatment Center.
17
23. In June 2022 or thereabout, Defendant elevated Ronnika Rupert to the position of
18
Director of Nursing and she is working in that capacity.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
24. Ronnika hired new staff, friends from outside the facility, who under her directives
often fabricate lies against Plaintiff and incite patients against him, for the purpose
of undermining his job performance and to force him to quit or be terminated.
25. Plaintiff became a fair game for all sorts of derogatory remarks, false allegations,
and discriminatory enforcement of discipline and disparate treatments.
26. Ronnika, openly question why the Plaintiff should get State job, falsely alleging that
Nigerians get into positions because “American white government” offer them free
scholarships, jobs, and positions they do not deserve in this country.
27. Ronnika, also complained about Nigerians dominance in American healthcare.
28
4
_________________________________________________
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
Case 2:23-cv-00487-JCM-DJA Document 31-1 Filed 02/02/24 Page 5 of 9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
28. Plaintiff was required to prepare Incident Reports about incidents he did not witness
even when the nurses involved in the incidents were ready to prepare the Reports.
29. Sometime in June 2022 and thereafter Plaintiff requested to work overtime for any
weekend shift, but Defendant denied him overtime opportunity.
30. Defendant gives all overtime in the Unit to Marc Yee, a registered nurse and Asian
American over whom Plaintiff had 6 years seniority in the facility.
31. Defendant scheduled Marc Yee to work 16 hours per day on Mondays, Tuesdays,
Wednesdays; and 16 hours per day on Saturdays and Sundays, making a total of 80
hours per week (40 regular hours and 40 overtime hours) since June 2022.
32. Plaintiff was always penalized for coming minutes late or leaving minutes early
even for medical reasons and his paychecks were deducted accordingly.
33. Defendant never penalized Marc Yee, who often came hours late and frequently left
12
hours early, yet he received full paycheck for hours he did not work.
13
34. On September 19, 2022 Marc worked overtime shift from 6:45am that should end
14
11:15pm but he left two hours early at 8:42pm, yet he was paid the full 16 hours.
15
35. Whenever Plaintiff comes to work late or leaves early, even for medical reasons,
16
Defendant would deduct the hours from his paycheck or sick leave PTO.
17
36. On June 6, 2022 Plaintiff again requested for weekend swing shift overtime and
18
reminded Defendant that only Marc Yee had been getting all the overtime.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
37. On August 27, 2022 Marc Yee was given overtime evening shift that Plaintiff had
requested because as Marc Yee boasted “overtime is for only Americans and
Asians, never for fucking Nigerians.”
38. On August 28, 2022 Plaintiff was a mere witness to an incident which the nurse
involved had prepared an Incident Report but Plaintiff was reprimanded for errors
in the report and directed to do the required corrections contrary to nursing practice.
39. On September 3, 2022 Marc Yee was given overtime evening shift for Saturday
26
and Sunday that Plaintiff had requested but was not considered because “overtime is
27
not for a fucking Nigerian” “it’s for Americans and Asians who speak better
28
English”.
5
_________________________________________________
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
Case 2:23-cv-00487-JCM-DJA Document 31-1 Filed 02/02/24 Page 6 of 9
1
2
3
4
5
6
40. Ronnika said to Plaintiff how much she hated American government for giving
Nigerians scholarship and jobs that should be given to African Americans.
41. Plaintiff complained to Administration about all the discriminatory and disparate
treatments he was being subjected to, but Administration did nothing.
42. Plaintiff has worked over ten years, serving three Administrations prior to the
arrival of Ronnika and Plaintiff always had satisfactory performance evaluation.
7
43. Defendant resented Plaintiff’s complaints regarding discrimination and disparate
8
treatment and thereafter subjected him to series of retaliatory measures including
9
a negative performance evaluation and probation.
10
44. On September 15, 2023 Defendant took the ultimate retaliatory measures against
11
Plaintiff by terminating him based on an alleged failure to attend to a patient who
12
had sustained a fresh wound injury.
13
45. Defendant’s basis for terminating plaintiff’s employment was a mere pretext for
14
retaliation in view of his protected action of filing complaint with Nevada Equal
15
Rights Commission and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
16
46. The alleged failure to attend to an injured patient was mere pretext because it was
17
never substantiated with records of the wound, treatment notes, medical reports,
18
or any evidence that such a patient was ever brought to the attention of Plaintiff.
19
20
21
22
47. Plaintiff suffered depression, anxiety, high blood pressure and emotional distress,
because of the discriminatory and disparate treatments by the Defendant.
48. Plaintiff required medical treatment and incurred medical bills for the treatments.
FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
(Discrimination and/or Disparate Treatment on the Basis Of National Origin)
23
24
25
26
27
49. Plaintiff repeats allegations contained in preceding paragraphs by reference.
50. Defendant subjected Plaintiff to discriminatory and/or disparate treatments based on
national origin, to wit, by treating him less favorably than other similarly situated
employees outside his national origin.
28
6
_________________________________________________
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
Case 2:23-cv-00487-JCM-DJA Document 31-1 Filed 02/02/24 Page 7 of 9
1
2
3
4
5
51. Defendant subjected Plaintiff to discriminatory and/or disparate treatments based
on national origin in the form of disparate supervision, disparate enforcement of the
attendance policy, disparate overtime schedule, and disparate terms of employment.
52. Defendant subjected Plaintiff to discriminatory and/or disparate terms, tangible
employment actions that adversely affected his performance and employment.
6
53. Defendant’s discriminatory and/or disparate treatments based on national origin are
7
in violation of Title VII of Civil Rights Act 1964 as amended and NRS 613.320.
8
54. As a result of Defendant’s disparate treatments and tangible employment actions
9
Plaintiff has suffered loss of earning from several denied overtime opportunity.
10
55. Plaintiff is entitled to recover lost overtime earning at the rate of an hour and half
11
for 40 hours per paycheck being $2,820 from June 2022 through September 15,
12
2023, being a total sum of $50,760.
13
56. Plaintiff is entitled to recover medical bills and expenses in the sum of $12,487.
14
57. Plaintiff suffered humiliation, sleepless nights, loss of enjoyment of life, pain and
15
16
suffering and he entitled to recover $300,000 in general compensation.
SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
(Retaliation)
17
18
58. Plaintiff repeats allegations contained in preceding paragraphs by reference.
19
59. The defendant embarked upon tangible and adverse employment actions against
20
Plaintiff before, during, and after he complained to administration, the NERC and
21
the EEOC, about being discriminated against by Defendant.
22
60. Defendant took tangible and adverse employment actions against Plaintiff because
23
he engaged in a protected action, to wit, complaining about disparate treatment and
24
discrimination based on national origin.
25
26
27
28
61. Defendant retaliated against Plaintiff by giving him unsatisfactory job performance
evaluation, probation, and finally terminating his employment.
62. Defendant’s unsatisfactory performance evaluation of Plaintiff is in contrast with
past years of satisfactory job evaluations and therefore a pretext for retaliation.
7
_________________________________________________
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
Case 2:23-cv-00487-JCM-DJA Document 31-1 Filed 02/02/24 Page 8 of 9
63. Defendant’s retaliatory adverse employment actions against Plaintiff caused him to
1
suffer humiliation, depression, and high blood pressure requiring medical treatment.
2
64. Plaintiff is entitled to recover medical bills and expenses in the sum of $12,487.
3
65. Plaintiff is entitled to recover $8,480 back pay per month from the date of his
4
termination through the date of judgment.
5
66. Plaintiff is entitled to recover $110,240 front pay in lieu of reinstatement.
6
67. Plaintiff suffered humiliation, sleepless nights, loss of enjoyment of life, pain and
7
suffering and he entitled to recover $300,000 in general compensation.
8
ATTORNEY FEES
9
68. Plaintiff was compelled to retain the services of an attorney to file Charges at the
10
administrative agency, to file and prosecute this lawsuit and, therefore, he is entitled
11
to recover reasonable attorney fees and costs incurred.
12
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
13
WHEREOF Plaintiff prays fir judgment against Defendant as follows:
14
1. Declaration that the actions complained constitute disparate treatment based on
15
national origin in violation of Title VII of Civil Rights Act 1964 as amended.
16
2. Declaration that the actions complained constitute retaliation in violation of Title
17
VII of Civil Rights Act 1964 as amended.
18
3. Award of special damages and general damages as follows:
19
a. $12,487 medical bills incurred.
20
b. $50,760 for lost overtime earning.
21
c. $8.480 back pay per month from date of termination through date of judgment.
22
d. $110,240 front pay in lieu of reinstatement.
23
e. $300,000 general compensation for discriminatory / disparate treatments.
24
f. $300,000 general compensation for retaliation.
25
g. Award of reasonable attorney fees and Court costs in this action.
26
h. Award of post-judgment interest at the legal rate until paid in full.
27
28
i. Such other and further relief as this honorable Court may deem just and proper.
////
8
_________________________________________________
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
Case 2:23-cv-00487-JCM-DJA Document 31-1 Filed 02/02/24 Page 9 of 9
DEMAND FOR JURY
1
2
3
Plaintiff, Godfrey Mere, exercises his right under the United States Constitution and
applicable statutes and requests that all issues of fact in this action be determined by a jury.
4
Dated this 24th day of January, 2024.
5
6
7
8
9
10
/s/Guinness Ohazuruike___
Guinness Ohazuruike, Esq.
GUINNESS LAW FIRM
6845 W. Charleston Blvd, #A
Las Vegas, Nevada 89117
Telephone:(702) 473-9300
Facsimile:(702) 920-8112
guinnesslaw@gmail.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
11
12
13
14
VERIFICATION OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
I, Godfrey Mere, affirms and states that I am the Plaintiff in this proceeding; that I have
read the Second Amended Complaint and knows the contents thereof; that the same is true to the
15
best of my knowledge except as to the matters therein stated to be alleged upon information and
16
17
18
belief, and as to those matters, I believe them to be true.
“I declare under penalty of perjury under the law of the State of Nevada and the United
States that the foregoing is true and correct.”
19
20
Dated this 24th day of Jan, 2024.
/s/Godfrey Mere
GODFREY MERE
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
9
_________________________________________________
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?