Symeonides v. Trump Ruffin Commercial LLC et al

Filing 35

ORDER Granting 34 Stipulation to Exceed the 10 Deposition Limit Pursuant to Rule 30(a)(2)(A). Signed by Magistrate Judge Maximiliano D. Couvillier, III on 5/9/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - RJDG)

Download PDF
1 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 JOSH COLE AICKLEN Nevada Bar No. 007254 Josh.Aicklen@lewisbrisbois.com DAVID B. AVAKIAN Nevada Bar No. 009502 YILMAZ E. TURKERI Nevada Bar No. 15468 David.Avakian@lewisbrisbois.com 6385 S. Rainbow Boulevard, Suite 600 Las Vegas, Nevada 89118 Telephone: 702.893.3383 Facsimile: 702.893.3789 Attorneys for Defendant TRUMP RUFFIN TOWER I, LLC, erroneously sued herein as TRUMP RUFFIN COMMERCIAL, LLC, d/b/a TRUMP INTERNATIONAL LAS VEGAS and TRUMP INTERNATIONAL HOTEL & TOWER LAS VEGAS; and TRUMP INTERNATIONAL HOTELS MANAGEMENT, LLC 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 DISTRICT OF NEVADA, SOUTHERN DIVISION 14 15 SEBASTIAN SYMEONIDES, an Case No. 2:23-cv-00854-JAD-MDC 16 STIPULATION TO EXCEED THE 10 DEPOSITION LIMIT PURSUANT TO RULE 30(a)(2)(A) Individual, 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Plaintiff, vs. TRUMP RUFFIN COMMERCIAL, LLC, a Foreign Limited-Liability Company d/b/a TRUMP INTERNATIONAL LAS VEGAS and TRUMP INTERNATIONAL HOTEL & TOWER LAS VEGAS; TRUMP RUFFIN TOWER I, LLC, a Foreign Limited-Liability Company; TRUMP INTERNATIONAL HOTELS MANAGEMENT, LLC, a Foreign Limited-Liability Company; OTIS ELEVATOR CORPORATION, a Foreign Corporation; DOES I through X, inclusive; and ROE BUSINESS ENTITIES I through XX, inclusive, 25 Defendants. 26 27 LEWIS COMES NOW, Plaintiff SEBASTIAN SYMEONIDES, by and through his attorneys 28 BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW Case No. 2:23-cv-00854-JAD-VCF STIPULATION TO EXCEED THE 10 DEPOSITION LIMIT PURSUANT TO RULE 30(a)(2)(A) 139860238.1 1 of record, the law firm CHRISTIANSEN TRIAL LAWYERS, Defendant TRUMP RUFFIN 2 TOWER I, LLC, erroneously sued herein as TRUMP RUFFIN COMMERCIAL, LLC, d/b/a 3 TRUMP INTERNATIONAL LAS VEGAS and TRUMP INTERNATIONAL HOTEL & 4 TOWER LAS VEGAS; and TRUMP INTERNATIONAL HOTELS MANAGEMENT, LLC by 5 and through its counsel of record, the law firm LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP 6 and Defendant OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY by and through its counsel of record, the law 7 firm ROGERS, MASTRANGELO, CARVALHO, AND MITCHELL and TUCKER ELLIS LLP, 8 and hereby agree that the limit of ten (10) depositions per side, set forth by Fed. R. Civ. P. 9 30(a)(2)(A), will be exceeded by Defendants and by Plaintiffs as stipulated herein. 10 This matter involves allegations of personal injury by Plaintiff SEBASTIAN 11 SYMEONIDES as a result of an alleged elevator incident on February 14, 2022. Due to 12 the degree of alleged damages, as well as the complexity of the damages and the alleged 13 incident, the parties agree that the ten (10) deposition limit per side will prevent the parties 14 from adequately preparing their cases for trial in this matter. This matter involves numerous 15 fact witnesses, including numerous medical and expert witnesses, which will need to be 16 deposed to adequately resolve this matter on the merits. 17 Therefore, the parties hereby stipulate to exceed ten (10) depositions per Fed. R. 18 Civ. P 30(a)(2)(A), subject to the following: LEWIS 19 1. Nothing in the parties’ stipulation or any associated Order shall be construed so 20 as to modify the Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(d)(1) limitations as to deposition duration 21 (“[u]nless otherwise stipulated or ordered by the court, a deposition is limited to 22 1 day of 7 hours”); nor shall this stipulation be construed so as to deprive any 23 party of that party’s right to seek Court relief from the Rule 30(d) deposition 24 duration limitations pursuant to that subsection. 25 2. Nothing in the parties’ stipulation or any associated Order shall be construed so 26 as to prejudice or preclude the right of any parties hereto from seeking Court 27 relief, including but not limited to any protective orders, pursuant to any 28 applicable provisions of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure – including but not BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW Case No. 2:23-cv-00854-JAD-VCF 2 STIPULATION TO EXCEED THE 10 DEPOSITION LIMIT PURSUANT TO RULE 30(a)(2)(A) 139860238.1 limited to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c), 30(d), 30(g). 1 2 Dated this 7th day of May, 2024 Dated this 7th day of May, 2024 3 CHRISTIANSEN TRIAL LAWYERS LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 /s/ R. Todd Terry PETER CHRISTIANSEN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 5254 R. TODD TERRY, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 6519 KEELY P. CHIPPOLETTI, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 13931 710 South 7th Street Las Vegas, NV 89101 Attorneys for Plaintiff 11 12 13 Dated this 7th day of May, 2024 ROGERS, MASTRANGELO, CARVALHO & MITCHELL /s/ Josh Cole Aicklen JOSH COLE AICKLEN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 7254 DAVID B. AVAKIAN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 9502 YILMAZ E. TURKERI, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 15468 6385 S. Rainbow Blvd., Suite 600 Las Vegas, NV 89118 Attorneys for Defendant Trump Ruffin Tower I, Trump International Las Vegas and Trump International Hotel & Tower Las Vegas and Trump International Hotels Management, LLC 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 LEWIS 28 /s/ Rebecca L. Mastrangelo REBECCA L. MASTRANGELO, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 5417 700 South 3rd Street Las Vegas, NV 89101 Attorneys for Defendant Otis Elevator Company Dated this ___ day of May, 2024 TUCKER ELLIS LLP /s/ Vasudhsiri T. Sathienmars SU-LYN COMBS, ESQ. (Pro Hac Vice) 515 South Flower Street Forty-Second Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 IT IS SO ORDERED V. SATHIENMARS (Pro Hac Vice) 201 Mission Street, Suite 2310 San Francisco, CA 94105 United States Magistrate Judge Attorneys for Defendant Otis Elevator Company /s/ 5-9-24 DATED: __________________________ BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW Case No. 2:23-cv-00854-JAD-VCF 3 STIPULATION TO EXCEED THE 10 DEPOSITION LIMIT PURSUANT TO RULE 30(a)(2)(A) 139860238.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?