Garcia v. Dr. Reese et al

Filing 28

ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Garcia's motions ECF Nos. 24 , 25 are denied as moot. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 7/8/2024. (For Distribution by law library.)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - GA)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 ERIC GARCIA, 4 Plaintiff 5 v. Case No.: 2:23-cv-01023-APG-DJA Order Denying Pending Motions as Moot [ECF Nos. 24, 25] 6 DR. REESE, et al., 7 Defendants 8 Plaintiff Eric Garcia filed two motions to enforce the settlement agreement he entered 9 into with the defendants. ECF Nos. 24, 25. The defendants responded by providing proof that 10 the terms of the settlement agreement have now been satisfied. ECF No. 27. Garcia has not filed 11 a reply or other paper disputing the defendants’ representation. Thus, Garcia’s motions are 12 moot. 13 I THEREFORE ORDER that Garcia’s motions (ECF Nos. 24, 25) are denied as moot. 14 DATED: July 8, 2024. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?